Skip to main content
Log in

Deformation characteristics in hydro-mechanical forming process of thin-walled hollow component with large deformation: experimentation and finite element modeling

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The automobile exhaust manifold regularly has a multi-valved shape that used to be formed by the combination of stamping and welding. The current study intended to investigate and develop a tube hydro-mechanical forming (THMF) process to form an integral automobile exhaust manifold that has the characters of large deformation and small corner. It included three stages such as pre-forming stage, die-forming stage, and calibration stage. In addition, the non-feasibility of one-step hydroforming process was proved by FE modeling and experimental for the target component. An optimal loading path was obtained through the principle of dichotomy for pre-forming stage and die-forming stage, corresponding to the maximum thinning ratio of 19.7% and 13.27% respectively. The variation of stress and strain states were analyzed for the whole process. As a consequent, the thickness distribution exhibited a V-shaped along axial direction at each stage, while a fluctuated distribution after die-forming was presented along radial direction in the multi-valved area. For the final component, a maximum thinning ratio of 28.53% and the large deformation above 60% obtained from FE modeling kept a reasonable agreement with that achieved from experiments. It showed that THMF has advantages of not only decreasing the internal pressure but also improving the formability of tube.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El-Aty AA, Xu Y, Guo XZ, Zhang SH, Ma Y, Chen DY (2018) Strengthening mechanisms, deformation behavior, and anisotropic mechanical properties of Al-Li alloys: a review. J Adv Res 10:49–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. He B, Tang W, Huang S, Hou SC, Cai HX (2016) Towards low-carbon product architecture using structural optimization for lightweight. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(5-8):1419–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yuan SJ, Liu G, Huang XR, Wang XS, Xie WC, Wang ZR (2004) Hydroforming of typical hollow components. J Mater Process Technol 151(1-3):203–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dohmann F, Hartl C (1996) Hydroforming - a method to manufacture light-weight parts. J Mater Process Technol 60:669–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmetoglu M, Altan T (2000) Tube hydroforming: state-of-the-art and future trends. J Mater Process Technol 98(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwan C, Lin F (2003) Investigation of T-shape tube hydroforming with finite element method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21(6):420–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwan C, Lin C, Luo Y, Hu W, Jau T (2004) Die shape design for T-shape tube hydroforming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23(3-4):169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Asnafi N (1999) Analytical modelling of tube hydroforming. Thin-Walled Struct 34(4):295–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Asnafi N, Skogsgårdh A (2000) Theoretical and experimental analysis of stroke-controlled tube hydroforming. Mater Sci Eng A 279(1-2):95–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koc M, Altan T (2002) Prediction of forming limits and parameters in the tube hydroforming process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(1):123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu Y, Zhang SH, Cheng M, Song HW (2015) Formability improvement of austenitic stainless steel by pulsating hydroforming. Proc IMechE B J Eng Manuf 229(4):609–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma Y, Xu Y, Zhang SH, Chen DY, El-Aty AA, Li JM, Chen GQ (2017) The effect of tube bending, heat treatment and loading paths on process responses of hydroforming for automobile intercooler pipe: numerical and experimental investigations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(5-8):2369–2381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen DY, Xu Y, Zhang SH, Zhao ZJ, El-Aty AA, Ma Y, Li JM (2018) Evaluation of numerical and experimental investigations on the hybrid sheet hydroforming process to produce a novel high-capacity engine oil pan. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(9-12):3625–3636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hwang YM, Hsieh SY, Kuo NJ (2017) Study of large-expansion-ratio tube hydroforming with movable dies. Key Eng Mater 725:616–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hwang YM, Hsieh SY, Chen MC (2015) Tube hydroforming of fuel filler pipes with movable dies. In Key Eng Mater Trans Tech Publ 626:524–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wada M, Iguchi K, Mizumura M, Kaneda H (2013) Weight reduction of axle-housings using high-expansion-ratio hydroforming technology. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on tube hydroforming 68-72

  17. Cogan RM (1963) Hydrodynamic compression forging. Gen Electric Company 111:7–890

    Google Scholar 

  18. Balendra R, Qin Y (2004) Injection forging: engineering and research. J Mater Process Technol 145(2):189–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qin Y, Ma Y, Balendra R (2004) Pressurising materials and process design considerations of the pressure-assisted injection forging of thick-walled tubular components. J Mater Process Technol 150(1-2):30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chavdar B, Goldstein R, Ferguson L (2016) Hot hydroforging of lightweight bimaterial gears and hollow products. In 23rd IFHTSE Congress 18-22

  21. Müller K, Stonis M, Lücke M, Behrens BA (2012) Hydroforging of thick-walled hollow aluminum profiles. In Key Eng Mater Trans Tech Publications 504:181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu Y, Ma Y, Zhang SH, Chen DY, Zhang XS, Li JM, Zhao ZJ (2016) Numerical and experimental study on large deformation of thin-walled tube through hydroforging process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(5-8):1885–1890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chu GN, Chen G, Lin YL, Yuan SJ (2017) Tube hydroforging− a method to manufacture hollow component with varied cross-section perimeters. J Mater Process Technol 265:150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu Y, Zhang SH, Cheng M, Song HW (2012) In situ X-ray diffraction study of martensitic transformation in austenitic stainless steel during cyclic tensile loading and unloading. Scr Mater 67(9):771–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Strano M, Altan T (2004) An inverse energy approach to determine the flow stress of tubular materials for hydroforming applications. J Mater Process Technol 146(1):92–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kadkhodayan M, Erfani-Moghadam A (2012) an investigation of the optimal load paths for the hydroforming of T-shaped tubes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61(1-4):73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang TL, Song XW, Liu M (2016) The optimization of the loading path for T-shape tube hydroforming using adaptive radial basis function. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(9-12):1843–1857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Plancak M, Vollertsen F, Woitschig J (2005) Analysis, finite element simulation and experimental investigation of friction in tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 170(1-2):220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abdelkefi A, Malécot P, Boudeau N, Guermazi N, Haddar N (2017) Evaluation of the friction coefficient in tube hydroforming with the “corner filling test” in a square section die. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(5-8):2265–2273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Carleer B, Van Der Kevie G, De Winter L, Van Veldhuizen B (2000) Analysis of the effect of material properties on the hydroforming process of tubes. J Mater Process Technol 104(1-2):158–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors extend sincere thanks and appreciation to Professor Asnafi Nader of ÖREBRO University (Sweden) for sustained advice and the language proofread.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grand No. 51875548) and Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province of China (Grand No. 20180550851).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Xu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, LL., Xu, Y., El-Aty, A.A. et al. Deformation characteristics in hydro-mechanical forming process of thin-walled hollow component with large deformation: experimentation and finite element modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104, 4705–4714 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04346-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04346-1

Keywords

Navigation