Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Incremental stamping forming with use of roller ball tool in aluminum and magnesium alloy

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent advance of the single-point incremental forming (SPIF) was possible by flexibility with used the Computer Numeric Control (CNC) machine and increase manufacture. The objective of this study is to investigate correlation between the limit angle, work-hardening, stress coefficient, and thickness in two alloys, an aluminum EN AW-1100 and magnesium AZ31-B. For this study, tests were on aluminum and magnesium plates with thickness 1 mm for stamping of cones, with a roller ball tool for conditions, spindle speeds 0 RPM, feed rate 1500 mm/min, and increment 0.01 mm/rot. The study points to a phenomenon with few observations so far, which is adhesion at the tip of the tool and influences the fracture in the material. The experimental results show that an adhesion is an indicator of premature fracture in the material, and favors the conformation of the material the increase of strength coefficient, and the reduction of the strain-hardening exponent of the hooloning equation favors the conformation of the material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Durante M, Formisano A, Lambiase F (2018) Incremental forming of polycarbonate sheets. J Mater Process Technol 253:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zha GC, Shi XF, Zhao W, Gao L, Wu ML (2016) Experimental research of incremental sheet forming based on fastened pre-tensioning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82:711–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7411-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jeswieta J, Micarib F, Hirtc G, Bramleyc A, Dufloue JA (2005) Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal. CIRP Ann 54:88–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Duflou JR, Behera AK, Vanhove H, Bertol LS (2013) Manufacture of accurate titanium cranio-facial implants with high forming angle using single point incremental forming. Key Eng Mater 549:223–230. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.549.223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mirnia MJ, Shamsari M (2017) Numerical prediction of failure in single point incremental forming using a phenomenological ductile fracture criterion. J Mater Process Technol 244:17–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Henry SD, Davidson GM, Lampman SR, Reidenbach F, Boring RL, Scott WW Jr (1996) Fatigue data book: light structural alloys. ASM Int 33:33–5731. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-5731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Song L, Wu B, Zhang L, du X, Wang Y, Esling C (2018) Twinning characterization of fiber-textured AZ31-B magnesium alloy during tensile deformation. Mater Sci Eng A 710:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Min J, Kuhlenkötter B, Shu C, Störkle D, Thyssen L (2018) Experimental and numerical investigation on incremental sheet forming with flexible ort from metallic foam. J Manuf Process 31:605–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bagudanch I, Lozano-Sánchez LM, Puigpinós L, Sabater M, Elizalde LE, Elías-Zúñiga A, Garcia-Romeu ML (2015) Manufacturing of polymeric biocompatible cranial geometry by single point incremental forming. Procedia Eng 132:267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu H, Kearney M, Li Y, Liu S, Daniel WJT, Meehan PA (2016) Model predictive control of incremental sheet forming for geometric accuracy improvement. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82:1781–1794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7431-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gatea S, Ou H, McCartney G (2016) Review on the influence of process parameters in incremental sheet forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:479–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8426-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hussain G, Gao L, Hayat N, Cui Z, Pang YC, Dar NU (2007) Tool and lubrication for negative incremental forming of a. J Mater Process Technol 3:193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Diabb J, Rodríguez CA, Mamidi N, Sandoval JA, Taha-Tijerina J, Martínez-Romero O, Elías-Zúñiga A (2017) Study of lubrication and wear in single point incremental sheet forming (SPIF) process using vegetable oil nanolubricants. Wear 376–377:777–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel A, Guo H, Iglesias P (2018) Study of the lubricating ability of protic ionic liquid on an aluminum-steel contact. Lubricants 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants6030066

  15. Dakhli M, Boulila A, Tourki Z (2017) Effect of generatrix profile on single-point incremental forming parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:2505–2516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0598-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hussain G, Gao L (2007) A novel method to test the thinning limits of sheet metals in negative incremental forming. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:419–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.06.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bai L, Yang M, Cui F et al (2018) Study on thickness thinning ratio of the forming parts in single point incremental forming process. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2927189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McAnulty T, Jeswiet J, Doolan M (2017) Formability in single point incremental forming: a comparative analysis of the state of the art. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 16:43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar A, Gulati V (2018) Experimental investigations and optimization of forming force in incremental sheet forming. Sadhana 43:43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0926-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dong C, Sun J, Cheng Z, Hou Y (2019) Preparation and tribological properties of a microemulsion for magnesium alloy warm rolling. Ind Lubr Tribol 71:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILT-06-2018-0222

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the institutions PUC-MG, CNPQ, FAPEMIG for the support and encouragement of technological research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

    Daniel de Castro Maciel, Gilmar Cordeiro da Silva & Lucas Mendes de Quadros

Authors
  1. Daniel de Castro Maciel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gilmar Cordeiro da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lucas Mendes de Quadros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel de Castro Maciel.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Castro Maciel, D., da Silva, G.C. & de Quadros, L.M. Incremental stamping forming with use of roller ball tool in aluminum and magnesium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108, 455–462 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05425-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05425-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation