Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On-line melt pool temperature control in L-PBF additive manufacturing

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laser powder bed fusion is a promising additive manufacturing technology which has enabled the fabrication of complex-shape, custom-designed, and cost-effective parts with no need for expensive tools and dies. Despite the numerous advantages of this technology, inconsistency in the microstructure and, consequently, the mechanical properties of the fabricated components in the building direction makes it quite challenging to obtain uniform parts in the as-built state. This issue originates from the layer-by-layer melt pool temperature variation caused by the layer-wise nature of this process when a fixed set of process parameters is applied. Accordingly, a layer-wise melt pool temperature control system is beneficial in manipulating the process parameters and therefore adjusting the melt pool temperature. In this study, three different controllers, namely, simple proportional (P), adaptive P, and sliding mode, were designed to control the melt pool temperature in the building direction for Inconel 625 superalloy. An analytical-experimental model was introduced to evaluate the performance of controllers through simulation. A monitoring system having a two-color pyrometer was used to online monitor the temperature for use by the controllers as a feedback signal. The microstructure and microhardness of the final products were evaluated prior to and after employing the melt pool temperature controllers. Compared to the scenario with constant process parameters, the implementation of these controllers led to improved microhardness and microstructure uniformity, resulting from the reduced variation in the primary dendrite arm spacing. The lessons learned from this study can assist in the fabrication of functionally graded materials with engineered microstructures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AM:

Additive manufacturing

CAD:

Computer-aided design

CMOS:

Complementary metal oxide semiconductor

FGM:

Functionally graded material

LI:

Length of interval

L-PBF:

Laser powder bed fusion

PID:

Proportional-integral-derivative

PI:

Proportional-integral

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

SMC:

Sliding mode control

References

  1. Lo YL, Liu BY, Tran HC (2019) Optimized hatch space selection in double-scanning track selective laser melting process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:2989–3006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04456-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Everton SK, Hirsch M, Stavroulakis PI, Leach RK, Clare AT (2016) Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing. Mater Des 95:431–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Foster BK, Reutzel EW, Nassar AR, Dickman CJ, Hall BT (2015) A brief survey of sensing for metal-based powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. In: Dimensional Optical Metrology and Inspection for Practical Applications IV, vol 9489, p 94890B. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2180654

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Chua ZY, Ahn IH, Moon SK (2017) Process monitoring and inspection systems in metal additive manufacturing: status and applications. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Tech 4:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-017-0029-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fereiduni E, Ghasemi A, Elbestawi M (2020) Selective laser melting of aluminum and titanium matrix composites: recent progress and potential applications in the aerospace industry. Aerospace 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/AEROSPACE7060077

  6. Zeinali M, Khajepour A (2010) Height control in laser cladding using adaptive sliding mode technique: theory and experiment. J Manuf Sci E T ASME 132:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohr G, Altenburg SJ, Hilgenberg K (2020) Effects of inter layer time and build height on resulting properties of 316L stainless steel processed by laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 32:101080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Silva BL, Araujo IJC, Silva WS, Goulart PR, Garcia A, Spinelli JE (2011) Correlation between dendrite arm spacing and microhardness during unsteady-state directional solidification of Al-Ni alloys. Philos Mag Lett 91:337–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500839.2011.559911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Turhal MŞ, Savaşkan T (2003) Relationships between secondary dendrite arm spacing and mechanical properties of Zn-40Ai-Cu alloys. J Mater Sci 38:2639–2646. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024434602540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox J, Lopez F, Lane B, Yeung H, Grantham S. On the requirements for model-based thermal control of melt pool geometry in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Material Science & Technology Conference 2016 Oct 23, Salt Lake City, pp 133–140

  11. Mercelis P, Kruth JP, Van Vaerenbergh J (2007) Feedback control of selective laser melting. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Electromachining. ISEM 2007

  12. Craeghs T, Bechmann F, Berumen S, Kruth J-P (2010) Feedback control of Layerwise Laser Melting using optical sensors. Phys Procedia 5:505–514

  13. Renken V, Albinger S, Goch G, Neef A, Emmelmann C (2017) Development of an adaptive, self-learning control concept for an additive manufacturing process. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 19:57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2017.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Renken V, Lübbert L, Blom H, Von Freyberg A, Fischer A (2018) Model assisted closed-loop control strategy for selective laser melting. Procedia CIRP 74:659–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Renken V, von Freyberg A, Schünemann K, Pastors F, Fischer A (2019) In-process closed-loop control for stabilising the melt pool temperature in selective laser melting. Prog Addit Manuf 4:411–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-019-00083-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ning J, Sievers D, Garmestani H, Liang S (2019) Analytical modeling of in-process temperature in powder bed additive manufacturing considering laser power absorption, latent heat, scanning strategy, and powder packing. Materials. 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050808

  17. Carslaw HC, Jaeger JC (1959) Conduction of heat in solids. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  18. Hägglund T, Åström KJ (1990) An industrial adaptive PID controller. IFAC Proc Vol 23:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-6670(17)52729-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. El Rifai K (2009) Nonlinearly parameterized adaptive PID control for parallel and series realizations. In: 2009 American Control Conference, June 2009 St. Louis, pp 5150–5155

  20. Augusto JS (2010) Fixed and adaptive PID control of the temperature in a laboratory oven. 9–11

  21. Astrom KJ, Wittenmark B (1995) Adaptive control. Addison-Wesley, Boston

  22. Park K-B (2000) Discrete-time sliding mode controller for linear time-varying systems with disturbances. Trans Control Autom Sci Eng 2:244–247

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marchese G, Garmendia Colera X, Calignano F, Lorusso M, Biamino S, Minetola P, Manfredi D (2017) Characterization and comparison of Inconel 625 processed by selective laser melting and laser metal deposition. Adv Eng Mater 19. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201600635

  24. Qiu C, Chen H, Liu Q, Yue S, Wang H (2019) On the solidification behaviour and cracking origin of a nickel-based superalloy during selective laser melting. Mater Charact 148:330–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.12.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown CU, Jacob G, Possolo A, Beauchamp C, Peltz M, Stoudt M, Donmez A The effects of laser powder bed fusion process parameters on material hardness and density for nickel alloy 625. NIST Adv Manuf Ser:100–119. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-19

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L7, Canada

    Hossein Rezaeifar & M. A. Elbestawi

Authors
  1. Hossein Rezaeifar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. A. Elbestawi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Hossein Rezaeifar: investigation, methodology, conceptualization, writing-original draft. Mohamed Elbestawi: review and editing, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Rezaeifar.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent to publish

Authors grant the publisher the sole and exclusive license of the full copyright in the contribution.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rezaeifar, H., Elbestawi, M.A. On-line melt pool temperature control in L-PBF additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112, 2789–2804 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06441-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06441-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation