Skip to main content
Log in

Explicit solution of the overdetermined three-dimensional resection problem

  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

 Several procedures for solving in a closed form the three-dimensional resection problem have already been presented. In the present contribution, the overdetermined three-dimensional resection problem is solved in a closed form in two steps. In step one a combinatorial minimal subset of observations is constructed which is rigorously converted into station coordinates by means of the Groebner basis algorithm or the multipolynomial resultant algorithm. The combinatorial solution points in a polyhedron are then reduced to their barycentric in step two by means of their weighted mean. Such a weighted mean of the polyhedron points in ℝ3 is generated via the Error Propagation law/variance–covariance propagation. The Fast Nonlinear Adjustment Algorithm was proposed by C.F. Gauss, whose work was published posthumously, and C.G.I. Jacobi. The algorithm, here referred to as the Gauss–Jacobi Combinatorial algorithm, solves the overdetermined three-dimensional resection problem in a closed form without reverting to iterative or linearization procedures. Compared to the actual values, the obtained results are more accurate than those obtained from the closed-form solution of a minimano of three known stations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 29 August 2001 / Accepted: 19 July 2002

Correspondence to: E. W. Grafarend

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Awange, J., Grafarend, E. Explicit solution of the overdetermined three-dimensional resection problem. Journal of Geodesy 76, 605–616 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-002-0287-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-002-0287-0

Navigation