Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Two cases illustrating a potential difference between transobturator and retropubic slings

  • Case Report
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transobturator sling procedure is a relatively new technique as compared to the retropubic version. The functional differences between these two procedures are largely unknown. Two cases of failed transobturator slings are reported. In both cases, the procedure was done under local anesthesia and a cough stress test was performed to adjust the tape. The transobturator slings were unable to stop the leakage and we replaced them with the retropubic versions, which were successful. Even when pulled very tightly, some transobturator slings will fail to stop stress incontinence that is amenable to cure from a typically placed “tension-free” retropubic sling. The cough stress test can identify such cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A (2002) Standardization sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardization sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21(2):167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anger JT, Saigal CS, Litwin MS, Urologic Diseases of America Project (2006) The prevalence of urinary incontinence among community dwelling adult women: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Urol 175(2):601–604, Feb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Papa Petros P, Ulmsten U (1993) An integral theory and its method for the diagnosis and management of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 153 (Suppl):1–93

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ward KL, Hilton P, UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group (2004) A prospective multicenter randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: two-year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190(2):324–331, Feb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rajan S, Kohli N (2005) Retropubic hematoma after transobturator sling procedure. Obstet Gynecol 106(5 Pt 2):1199–1202 (Nov)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Minaglia S, Ozel B, Klutke C, Ballard C, Klutke J (2004) Bladder injury during transobturator sling. Urology 64(2):376–377 (Aug)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Delorme E (2001) Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol 11:1306–1313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Murphy M, Culligan PJ, Arce CM, Graham CA, Blackwell L, Heit MH (2005) Is the cough-stress test necessary when placing the tension-free vaginal tape? Obstet Gynecol 105(2):319–324 (Feb)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moses Mukai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mukai, M., Aboujaoude, R. & Culligan, P.J. Two cases illustrating a potential difference between transobturator and retropubic slings. Int Urogynecol J 18, 967–969 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0273-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0273-9

Keywords

Navigation