Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Blast waves from cylindrical charges

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparisons of explosives are often carried out using TNT equivalency which is based on data for spherical charges, despite the fact that many explosive charges are not spherical in shape, but cylindrical. Previous work has shown that it is possible to predict the over pressure and impulse from the curved surface of cylindrical charges using simple empirical formulae for the case when the length-to-diameter (L/D) ratio is greater or equal to 2/1. In this paper, by examining data for all length-to-diameter ratios, it is shown that it is possible to predict the peak over pressure, P, for any length-to-diameter ratio from the curved side of a bare cylindrical charge of explosive using the equation \(P=K_PM(L/D)^{1/3}/R^3\), where M is the mass of explosive, R the distance from the charge and \( K_P\) is an explosive-dependent constant. Further out where the cylindrical blast wave ‘heals’ into a spherical one, the more complex equation \(P=C_1(Z^{\prime \prime })^{-3}+C_2(Z^{\prime \prime })^{-2}+C_3(Z^{\prime \prime })^{-1}\) gives a better fit to experimental data, where \( Z^{\prime \prime } = M^{1/3}(L/D)^{1/9}/D\) and \(C_1,\, C_2 \) and \( C_3\) are explosive-dependent constants. The impulse is found to be independent of the L/D ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stoner, R.G., Bleakney, W.: The attenuation of spherical shock waves in air. J. Appl. Phys. 1948(19), 670–678 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cole, R.H.: Underwater explosions. Princeton University Press, New Jersey (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Victor, A.C.: Warhead Performance Calculations for threat Hazard Assessment. Department of Defense Explosives Safety Seminar, Las Vegas (1996)

  4. Knock, C., Davies, N.: Predicting the peak pressure from the curved surface of detonating cylindrical charges. Prop. Expl. Pyro. 36(3), 203–209 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Knock, C., Davies, N.: Predicting the impulse from the curved surface of detonating cylindrical charges. Prop. Expl. Pyro. 36(2), 105–109 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Swisdak M.M.: Explosion effects and Properties, Part 1- Explosion effects in air, Report NSWC/WOL/TR 75-116, Naval surface Weapons Report, White Oak, Silver, Spring, Maryland 20910 (1975)

  7. Wisotski J., Snyer W.H.: Characteristics of blast waves obtained from cylindrical high explosive charges. Report, University of Denver, Denver Research Institute, Denver, Colarado 80210 (1965)

  8. Plooster M.N.: Blast effects from cylindrical explosive charges: Experimental measurements. Report NWC TP 6382. Naval Report Centre, China Lake, California 93555 (1982)

  9. Brode, H.L.: Numerical solutions of blast waves. J. Appl. Phys. 26(6), 766–775 (1955)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Pechoux F., Simeons B., Lefebrve M.H.: TNT-Equivalent and explosive charge characteristics. 10eme Congres International de Pyrotechnic du Groupe de Travail de Pyrotechnie, Reims, pp. 592–597 (2011)

  11. Hammond L.: Underwater shock wave characteristics of cylindrical charges. Report DSTO-GD-0029, Aeronautical and maritime research Laboratory, ship structures and materials division. Quoting Rice and Gimmel (1944) reference not given (1995)

  12. JMEM the Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manual, Report USAF -61A1-3-7; NAVY NAVAIR 00–130-ASR-2-1; USMC FMFM 5–21; ARMY FM 101–51-3. Revision 2 (1989)

  13. Plooster M.N.: Blast front pressures from cylindrical charges of high explosives. Report NWC-TM-3631. Denver Research Institute, Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, California, 93555 (1978)

  14. Sachs R.G.: The dependence of blast on ambient pressure and temperature. BRL report 466, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland (1944)

  15. Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons, Report TM 5–855-1, US Army. Also known as Air force pamphlet AFPAM 32–1147 (I) and Navy manual NAVFAC (Naval facilities P-1080) and DSWA manual DAHSCWEMAN-97 (1986)

  16. Wharton, R.K., Formby, S.A., Merrifield, R.: Airblast TNT equivalence for a range of commerical explosives. J. Hazard. Mater. A79, 31–39 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maienschein, J.L.: Estimating equivalence of explosives through a thermochemical approach. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. URCL-JC-147683 (2002)

  18. Locking P.M.: The trouble with TNT equivalence. Ballistics 2011, 26th International symposium on ballistics Publ. Vol 1–2, pp. 143–154. Destech Publications Inc, Lancaster, PA (2011)

  19. Lindburg H.E., Firth, R.D.: Structural response of pine vehicles. Vol II simulation of transient surface loads by explosive blast waves. Stanford research Institute, Menlo Park, California. Technical Report AFWL-TR-66-163 Vol II (1967)

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of this work was funded by the Defence Academy—College of Management and Technology, UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cranfield University, Shrivenham, Swindon, Wilts, SN6 8LA, UK

    C. Knock & N. Davies

Authors
  1. C. Knock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Knock.

Additional information

Communicated by K. Hayashi and K. Kontis.

The paper was based on work that was presented at the 28th International Symposium on Shock Waves, 17–22 July, 2011, Manchester, UK.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knock, C., Davies, N. Blast waves from cylindrical charges. Shock Waves 23, 337–343 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-013-0438-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-013-0438-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation