Abstract
A common perception about molecular systems with a nonlocal electronic structure (as manifested by a nonlocal Hartree–Fock (HF) density matrix), such as conjugated π-systems, is that they can only be described in terms of nonlocal molecular orbitals. This view is mostly founded on chemical intuition, and further, this view is strengthened by traditional approaches for obtaining local occupied and virtual orbital spaces, such as the occupied Pipek–Mezey orbitals, and projected atomic orbitals. In this article, we discuss the limitations for localizability of HF orbitals in terms of restrictions posed by the delocalized character of the underlying density matrix for the molecular system and by the orthogonality constraint on the molecular orbitals. We show that the locality of the orbitals, in terms of nonvanishing charge distributions of orbitals centered far apart, is much more strongly affected by the orthogonality constraint than by the physical requirement that the occupied orbitals must represent the electron density. Thus, the freedom of carrying out unitary transformations among the orbitals provides the flexibility to obtain highly local occupied and virtual molecular orbitals, even for molecular systems with a nonlocal density matrix, provided that a proper localization function is used. As an additional consideration, we clear up the common misconception that projected atomic orbitals in general are more local than localized orthogonal virtual orbitals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lennard-Jones JE, Pople JA (1950) Proc R Soc 202(1069):166
Hall G (1950) Proc R Soc 202:336
Boys SF (1960) Rev Mod Phys 32:296
Boys SF (1966) Quantum theory of atoms, molecules and solid state. Academic, New York, p 253
Edmiston C, Ruedenberg K (1963) Rev Mod Phys 35(3):457
Caldwell D, Reddington P, Eyring H (1979) Proc Natl Acad Sci 76:3042
Reed AE, Weinhold F (1985) J Chem Phys 83:1736
Pipek J, Mezey PG (1989) J Chem Phys 90:4916
von Niessen W (1972) J Chem Phys 56:4290
Subotnik JE, Dutoi AD, Head-Gordon M (2005) J Chem Phys 123:114108
Aquilante F, Pedersen T, de Meras AS, Koch H (2006) J Chem Phys 125:174101
Weber V, Hutter J (2008) J Chem Phys 128(6). doi:10.1063/1.2828507
Ziółkowski M, Jansík B, Jørgensen P, Olsen J (2009) J Chem Phys 131:124112
Jansík B, Høst S, Kristensen K, Jørgensen P (2011) J Chem Phys 134:194104
de Silva P, Giebultowski M, Korchowiec J (2012) Phys Chem Chem Phys 14(2):546
Høyvik IM, Jansík B, Jørgensen P (2012) J Chem Phys 137:224114
Høyvik IM, Jansík B, Jørgensen P (2012) J Chem Theory Comput 8:3137
Dunning TH (1989) J Chem Phys 90(2):1007. doi:10.1063/1.456153
Löwdin PO (1949) J Chem Phys 18(3):365
Carlson BC, Keller JM (1957) Phys Rev 105(1):102
Høyvik IM, Jansík B, Jørgensen P (2013) J Comput Chem 34(17):1456
Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE (2004) J Comput Chem 25(13):1605. doi:10.1002/jcc.20084.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084
Acknowledgments
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement no. 291371
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dedicated to Professor Thom Dunning and published as a part of the special collection of articles celebrating his career upon his retirement.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Høyvik, IM., Kristensen, K., Kjærgaard, T. et al. A perspective on the localizability of Hartree–Fock orbitals. Theor Chem Acc 133, 1417 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-013-1417-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-013-1417-x