Skip to main content
Log in

Alkane effect in the Arizona liquid systems used in countercurrent chromatography

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Countercurrent chromatography (CCC) is a separation technique that uses a biphasic liquid system; one liquid phase is the mobile phase, the other liquid phase is the stationary phase. Selection of the appropriate liquid system can be a problem in CCC, since it is necessary to select both the “column” and the mobile phase at the same time as the first is completely dependent on the second. A range of systems with various proportions of solvents were developed to ease this choice; 23 variations of the heptane/ethyl acetate/methanol/water biphasic liquid system were labeled A to Z. This range proved to be extremely useful and became the popular Arizona (AZ) liquid system. However, authors often replace the heptane with hexane. In this work, the chemical compositions of the upper phases and the lower phases of 55 Arizona systems made with various alkanes (pentane, hexane, heptane, isooctane and cyclohexane) were determined by gas chromatography and Karl Fischer titration. The test mixture separated consisted of five steroid compounds. The lower phases were found to have similar compositions when different alkanes were used, but the upper phases were found to change. Exchanging heptane for hexane or isooctane produced minimal changes in the CCC chromatogram, while changing the proportions of the solvents resulted in an exponential change in the retention volumes. The high density of cyclohexane made liquid stationary phase retention difficult. All Arizona systems equilibrated within 30 min, but were not stable: water slowly hydrolyzed the ethyl acetate (as shown by a continuous decrease in the pH of the lower aqueous phase), especially in the water-rich systems (early alphabet letters).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berthod A (2002) Countercurrent chromatography, the support-free liquid stationary phase (comprehensive analytical chemistry, vol. 38). Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mandava NB, Ito Y (1985) Countercurrent chromatography, theory and practice (Chromatographic science series, vol. 44). Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oka F, Oka H, Ito Y (1991) J Chromatogr A 538:99–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schaufelberger DE (1996) In: Ito Y, Conway WD (eds) High-speed countercurrent chromatography. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Margraff R (1994) In: Foucault A (ed) Centrifugal partition chromatography (chromatographic science series, vol. 68). Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 331–350

    Google Scholar 

  6. Renault JH, Nuzillard JM, Intes O, Maciuk A (2002) In: Berthod A (ed) Countercurrent chromatography, the support-free liquid stationary phase (Comprehensive analytical chemistry, vol. 38). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 49–83

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ito Y, Conway WD (1984) J Chromatogr 301:405–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ito Y (1999) In Menet JM, Thiebaut D (eds) Countercurrent chromatography (chromatographic science series, vol. 82). Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 87–119

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berthod A, Carda-Broch S (2004) Anal Bioanal Chem 380:168–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Berthod A, Ruiz-Angel MJ, Carda-Broch S (2003) Anal Chem 75:5886–5894

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weast RC (1987) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. CRC, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen J, Yu Y, Li Z (2005) J Liq Chromatogr Rel Technol 28:1937–1946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Renon H, Prausnitz JM (1975) AIChE J 14:135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Berthod A, Bully M (1991) Anal Chem 63:2508–2512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Berthod A, Mallet AI, Bully M (1996) Anal Chem 68:431–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mandava NB, Ito Y, Ruth JM (1985) J Liq Chromatogr 8:2221–2238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Soczewinski E (1968) Adv Chromatogr 5:3–77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Soczewinski E (1980) J Liq Chromatogr 3:1781–1806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

AB thanks the French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS UMR 5180) for continuous support. MJRA thanks the Ministerio de la Educacion y Investigacion, Madrid, Spain, for a postdoctoral grant allowing her to work at the University of Lyon 1 laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Berthod.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berthod, A., Hassoun, M. & Ruiz-Angel, M.J. Alkane effect in the Arizona liquid systems used in countercurrent chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem 383, 327–340 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-0016-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-0016-7

Keywords

Navigation