Skip to main content
Log in

Direct competitive ELISA based on a monoclonal antibody for detection of aflatoxin B1. Stabilization of ELISA kit components and application to grain samples

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A direct competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on a monoclonal antibody has been developed and optimized for detection of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), and an ELISA kit has been designed. This immunoassay was highly specific, sensitive, rapid, simple, and suitable for aflatoxin monitoring. AFB1 concentrations determinable by ELISA ranged from 0.1 to 10 μg L−1. The IC50 value was 0.62 μg L−1. Recovery from spiked rice samples averaged between 94 and 113%. The effect of different reagents on the stability of HRP–AFB1 conjugate solution was studied. The performance of a stabilized enzyme tracer in ELISA was determined and compared with that of a freshly prepared control solution of HRP–AFB1 conjugate. The results showed that stabilizing media containing 0.02% BSA, 0.1% Kathon CG, and 0.05 mol L−1 calcium chloride in 0.05 mol L−1 Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.2) maintained the activity of HRP–AFB1 at a dilution of 1:1000 for a period of at least 12 months at room temperature whereas the reference conjugate solution without the additives lost its activity within a few days. Several additives were tested for their stabilizing effect on a monoclonal antibody (MAb) immobilized on the surface of polystyrene microtitre plates. It was shown that immobilized MAb, treated with post-coating solutions containing PVA, BSA, and combinations of these substances with trehalose, retained its activity for at least 4 months at 4°C, whereas the untreated MAb-coated plate lost its activity within 2 days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (1993) IARC monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans, vol 56. IARC, Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  2. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (1995) FAO Food and Nutrition Paper. FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  3. European Commission (1998), Commission Regulation 1525/98 Off J L201, 0093

  4. Scott PM (1993) Trends Anal Chem 12(9):382–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stroka J, van Otterdijk R, Anklam E (2000) J Chromatogr A 904:251–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jaimez J, Fente CA, Vazquez BI, Franco CM, Cepeda A, Mahuzier G, Prognon P (2000) J Chromatogr A 882:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Papp E, Otta KH, Záray G, Mincsovics E (2002) Microchem J 73:39–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Otta KH, Papp E, Bagócsi B (2000) J Chromatogr A 882:11–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Escobar A, Regueiro OS (2002) J Food Prot 65(1):219–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Park JW, Kim EK, Kim YB (2004) Food Addit Contam 21(1):70–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee NA, Wang S, Allan RD, Kennedy IR (2004) J Agric Food Chem 52:2746–2755

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roch OG, Blunden G, Coker RD, Nawaz S (1995) Food Chem 52:93–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Holcomb M, Thompson HC Jr, Cooper WM, Hopper ML (1996) J Supercrit Fluids 9:118–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Elizalde-González MP, Mattusch J, Wennrich R (1998) J Chromatogr A 828:439–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma M, Márquez C (2001) Animal Feed Sci Technol 93:109–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Blesa J, Soriano JM, Moltó JC, Marín R, Maòes J (2003) J Chromatogr A 1011:49–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chiavaro E, Dall'Asta C, Galaverna G, Biancardi A, Gambarelli E, Dossena A, Marchelli R (2001) J Chromatogr A 937:31–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peòa R, Alcaraz MC, Arce L, Ríos A, Valcárcel M (2002) J Chromatogr A 967:303–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marrazza G, Chianella I, Mascini M (1999) Anal Chim Acta 387:297–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Maragos CM, Thompson VS (1999) Nat Toxins 7:371–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Van der Gaag B, Spath S, Dietrich H, Stigter E, Boonzaaijer G, van Osenbruggen T, Koopal K (2003) Food Control 14:251–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Devi KT, Mayo MA, Reddy KLN, Delfosse P, Reddy G, Reddy SV, Reddy DVR (1999) Lett Appl Microbiol 29:284–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gathumbi JK, Usleber E, Märtlbauer E (2001) Lett Appl Microbiol 32:349–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Korde A, Pandey U, Banerjee S, Sarma HD, Hajare S, Venkatesh M, Sharma AK, Pillai MRA (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:843–846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Garden SR, Strachan NJC (2001) Anal Chim Acta 444:187–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Daly SJ, Keating GJ, Dillon PP, Manning BM, O'Kennedy R, Lee HA, Morgam MRA (2000) J Agric Food Chem 48:5097–5104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ho J-AA, Wauchope RD (2002) Anal Chem 74:1493–1496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pal A, Dhar TK (2004) Anal Chem 76:98–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nasir MS, Jolley ME (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:3116–3121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bhattacharya D, Bhattacharya R, Dhar TK (1999) J Immunol Methods 230:71–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lipigorngoson S, Limtrakul P, Suttajit M, Yoshizawa T (2003) Food Addit Contam 20(9):838–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gathumbi JK, Usleber E, Ngatia TA, Kangethe EK, Märtlbauer E (2003) Poult Sci 82(4):585–590

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ó'Fágáin C (1995) Biochim Biophys Acta 1252:1–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ó'Fágáin C (2003) Enzyme Microb Technol 33:137–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Schütz AJ, Winklmair M, Weller MG, Niessner R (1997) SPIE 3105:332–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kühlmeyer C, Klein J (2002) Enzyme Microb Technol 6196:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dankwardt A, Müller J, Hock B (1998) Anal Chim Acta 362:35–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Eremin AN, Budnikova LP, Sviridov OV, Metelitsa DI (2002) Appl Biochem Microbiol 38(2):151–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Chu FS, Hsia MTS, Sun PS (1977) J AOAC Int 60:791–794

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Langone JJ, Van Vunakis H (1975) Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 10:163–171

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kolosova AYu, Park JH, Eremin SA, Kang SJ, Chung DH (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:1107–1114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Heiss C, Weller MG, Niessner R (1999) Anal Chim Acta 396:309–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the National Toxicology Program of the National Institute of Toxicological Research, Brain Korea 21 Program from the Ministry of Education and the Environmental Biotechnology National Core Research Centre (grant R15-2003-012-01001-0) from KOSEF/MOST, Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Yu Kolosova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolosova, A.Y., Shim, WB., Yang, ZY. et al. Direct competitive ELISA based on a monoclonal antibody for detection of aflatoxin B1. Stabilization of ELISA kit components and application to grain samples. Anal Bioanal Chem 384, 286–294 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-0103-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-0103-9

Keywords

Navigation