Abstract
8-Hydroxy-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) DNA adduct is one of the most frequently used biomarkers reporting on the oxidative stress that leads to DNA damage. More sensitive and reliable microfluidic devices are needed for the detection of these biomarkers of interest. We have developed a capillary electrophoresis (CE)-based microfluidic device with an electroplated palladium decoupler that provides significantly improved detection limit, separation efficiency, and resolving power. The poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS)/glass hybrid device has fully integrated gold microelectrodes covered in situ with palladium nanoparticles using an electroplating technique. The performance and coverage of the electrodes electroplated with palladium particles were evaluated electrochemically and via scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging, respectively. The performance of the device was tested and evaluated with different buffer systems, pH values, and electric field strengths. The results showed that this device has significantly improved resolving power, even at separation electric field strengths as high as 600 V cm−1. The detection limit for the 8-OH-dG adduct is about 20 attomoles; the concentration limit is on the order of 100 nM (S/N = 3). A linear response is reported for both 8-OH-dG and dG in the range from 100 nM to 150 μM (≈100 pA μM−1) with separation efficiencies of approximately 120,000–170,000 plates m−1.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AD:
-
amperometric detection
- CE:
-
capillary electrophoresis
- dG:
-
deoxyguanosine
- 8-OH-dG:
-
8-hydroxy-deoxyguanosine
- ED:
-
electrochemical detection
- EG:
-
electrophoretic ground
- LOD:
-
limit of detection
- PDMS:
-
poly(dimethylsiloxane)
- WE:
-
working electrode
References
Floyd R, Watsonand J, Wong P, Altmiller D, Rickard R (1986) Free Radic Res Commun 1:163–172
Cavalieri E, Chakravarti D, Guttenplan J, Hart E, Ingle J, Jankowiak R, Muti P, Rogan E, Russo J, Santen R, Sutter T (2006) Biochim Biophys Acta 1766(1):63–78
Shigenaga M, Gimeno C, Ames B (1989) Proc Natl Acad Sci 86:9697–9701
Markushin Y, Gaikwad N, Zhang H, Kapke P, Rogan EG, Cavalieri EL, Trock BJ, Pavlovich C, Jankowiak R (2006) Prostate 66(14):1565–1571
Loft S, Vistisen K, Ewertz M, Tjonneland A, Overvad K, Poulsen H (1992) Carcinogenesis 13:2241–2247
Wu L, Chiou C, Chang P, Wu J (2004) Clin Chim Acta 339:1–9
Lin H, Jenner A, Ong C, Huang S, Whiteman M, Halliwell B (2004) Biochem 380:541–584
Yin B, Whyatt RM, Perera FP, Randall MC, Cooper TB, Santella RM (1995) Free Radic Biol Med 18:1023–1032
Adachi S, Zeisig M, Moller L (1995) Carcinogenesis 16:253–258
Hofer T, Moller L (2002) Chem Res Toxicol 15:426–432
Helbock H, Beckman K, Shigenaga M, Walter P, Woodall A, Yeo H, Ames B (1998) Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:288–293
Weiss D, Lunte CE (2000) Electrophoresis 21:2080–2085
Mei S, Yao Q, Cai L, Xing J, Xu G, Wu C (2003) Electrophoresis 24:1411–1415
Kok WT, Sahin Y (1993) Anal Chem 65:2497–2501
Zhang SS, Yuan ZB, Liu HX, Zou H, Wu YJJ (2000) Chromatogr A 872:259–268
Gordillo JM, Perez-Saborid M, Ganan-Calvo AM (2001) J Fluid Mech 448:23–51
Manz A, Grabner N, Widmer HM (1990) Sens Actuators B Chem 1:244–248
Manz A, Harrison DJ, Rettinger, Verpoorte E, Ludi H, Widmer HM (1990) Transducers. Digest of Technical Papers, IEEE 91 CH2817; IEEE: New York, 91:939–941
Harrison DJ, Manz A, Fan Z, Lüdi H, Widmer HM (1992) Anal Chem 64:1926–1932
Lacher NA, Garrison KE, Martin RS, Lunte SM (2001) Electrophoresis 22:2526–2536
Burns MA, Johnson BN, Brahmasandra SN, Handique K, Burke DT (1998) Science 282:484–487
Schwarz M, Hauser PC (2003) Anal Chem 75:4691–4695
Keynton RS, Roussel TJ, Crain MM, Jackson DJ, Franco DB, Naber JF, Walsh KM, Baldwin RP (2004) Anal Chim Acta 507:95–105
Blasco AJ, Barrigas I, Gonzalez MC, Escarpa A (2005) Electrophoresis 26:4664–4673
Zhang QL, Xu JJ, Lian HZ, Li XY, Chen HY (2000) Anal Bioanal Chem 384:265–270
Dawoud AA, Kawaguchi T, Markushin Y, Porter MD, Jankowiak R (2006) Sens Actuators B Chem 120(1):42–50
Vickers A, Henry CS (2005) Electrophoresis 26:4641–4647
Kovarik ML, Li MW, Martin SR (2005) Electrophoresis 26:202–210
Lacher NA, Lunte SM, Martin RS (2004) Anal Chem 76:2482–2491
Wu CC, Wu RG, Huang JG, Lin YC, Chang HC (2003) Anal Chem 75:947–952
Chen DC, Hsu FL, Zhan DZ, Chen CH (2001) Anal Chem 73:758–762
Worth CC, Schmitz OJ, Kliem HC, Wiessler M (2000) Electrophoresis 21:2086–2091
Li G, Gao J, Zhou X, Shimelis O, Giese RW (2003) J Chromatogr A 1004:47–50
Langmaier J, Samec Z, Samcova E (2003) Electroanalysis 15:1555–1560
Brett AMO, Piedade JA, Serrano SHP (2000) Electroanalysis 12:969–973
Baldwin RP, Roussel TJ, Crain MM, Bathlagunda V, Jackson DJ, Gullapalli J, Conklin JA, Pai R, Naber JF, Walsh KM, Keynton RS (2002) Anal Chem 74:3690–3697
Wilke R, Buttgenbach S (2003) Biosens Bioelectron 19(3):149–153
Klett O, Bjoerefors F, Nyholm L (2001) Anal Chem 73:1909–1915
Landers JP, Oda RP, Schuchard MD (1992) Anal Chem 64:2846–2851
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (ProgramProject Grant 2PO1 CA49210-12) and in part by the NIH COBRE award 1 P20 R15563, and matching support from the State of Kansas.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dawoud, A.A., Kawaguchi, T. & Jankowiak, R. Integrated microfluidic device with an electroplated palladium decoupler for more sensitive amperometric detection of the 8-hydroxy-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) DNA adduct. Anal Bioanal Chem 388, 245–252 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1203-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1203-5