Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Female sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimize MHC allele number during mate selection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical studies suggest that an optimal resistance to pathogens and parasites requires an optimal number of MHC alleles per individual. Here we argue that three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) achieve this goal by applying a strategy that involves a self-referential process. According to this model, females complement their own set of alleles with a more or less diverse set of male alleles such that the combined diversity reaches an optimum. In previous experiments, we have identified allele counting as a major mate-choice strategy in large populations. The self-referential allele-counting hypothesis predicts that MHC-based mate choice favors dissimilar MHC alleles in small populations facing the risk of inbreeding. Therefore, we conducted an experiment that simulated a small effective population size with low MHC class-II diversity. Our experiments are based on the analysis of MHC class-IIB alleles that explain a major part of the overall MHC diversity in sticklebacks, as determined by mathematical modeling. The results show that females preferred males with dissimilar alleles. Our present and the previous studies (which we reanalyzed with respect to our new predictions) show that irrespective of high or low population diversity faced by female sticklebacks for their mate choice, they use information about their own and their potential mate's MHC polymorphism for optimal complementation of their own set of alleles. From combining the data of the previous and the present experiment we found that female sticklebacks try to achieve an optimum number of MHC class-IIB alleles for their offspring through mate choice. The chosen MHC diversity is close to the most frequent diversity found naturally in individual fish, which in addition have the lowest parasite burden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aeschlimann P, Häberli M, Milinski M (2000) Threat-sensitive feeding strategy of immature sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in response to recent experimental infection with the cestode Schistocephalus solidus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apanius V, Penn D, Slev PR, Ruff LR, Potts WK (1997) The nature of selection on the major histocompatibility complex. Crit Rev Immunol 17:179–224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker TCM, Milinski M (1991) Sequential female choice and the previous male effect in sticklebacks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:205–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber I, Arnott SA, Braithwaite VA, Andrew J, Huntingford FA (2001) Indirect fitness consequences of mate choice in sticklebacks: offspring of brighter males grow slowly but resist parasitic infections. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:71–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp GK, Yamazaki K, Bard J, Boyse EA (1988) Preweaning experience in the control of mating preferences by genes in the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse. Behav Genet 18:537–547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binz T, Reusch TBH, Wedekind C, Milinski M (2001) SSCP analysis of Mhc class IIB genes in the threespine stickleback. J Fish Biol 58:887–890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorkmann PJ, Parham P (1990) Structure, function, and diversity of class-I major histocompatibility complex-molecules. Annu Rev Biochem 59:253–288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RE, Roser B, Singh PB (1989) Class I and class II regions of the major histocompatibility complex both contribute to individual odors in congenic inbred strains of rats. Behav Genet 19:659–674

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter R, Schofield L, Mendis K (1992) HLA effects in malaria: increased parasite-killing immunity or reduced immunopathology. Parasitol Today 8:41–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldridge VCK, Alexander GJ (2001) Does the time spent near a male predict female mate choice in a Malawian cichlid? J Fish Biol 59:667–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer RJ, Perelson AS (1993) How diverse should the immune system be? Proc R Soc Lond B 252:171–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty PC, Zinkernagel RM (1975) Enhanced immunological surveillance in mice hetereozygous at the H-2 gene complex. Nature 256:50–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyall R, Messaoudi I, Janetzki S, Nikolic-Zugic J (2000) MHC polymorphism can enrich the T cell repertoire of the species by shifts in intrathymic selection. J Immunol 164:1695–1698

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards SV, Hedrick PW (1998) Evolution and ecology of MHC molecules: from genomics to sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 13:305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384–387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW, Black FL (1997) HLA and mate selection: no evidence in South Amerindians. Am J Hum Genet 61:505–511

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AL, Hughes MK (1995) Natural selection on the peptide-binding regions of major histocompatibility complex molecules. Immun Gen 42:233–243

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AL, Nei M (1988) Patterns of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveal overdominant selection. Nature 335:167–170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AL, Yeager M (1998) Natural selection at major histocompatibility complex loci of vertebrates. Annu Rev Genet 32:415–435

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob S, McClintock MK, Zelano B, Ober C (2002) Paternally inherited HLA alleles are associated with women`s choice of male odor. Nat Genet 30:175–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein J (1986) Natural history of the major histocompatibility complex. Wiley, New York

  • Landry C, Garant D, Duchesne P, Bernatchez L (2001) Good genes as heterozygosity: the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1279–1285

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer TM, DeKoning J, Markowitz JS, Lo D, Glimcher LH (1996) Unopposed positive selection and autoreactivity in mice expressing class II MHC only on thymic cortex. Nature 383:81–85

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Málaga-Trillo E, Zaleska-Rutczynska Z, McAndrew B, Vincek V, Figueroa F, Sültmann H, Klein J (1998) Linkage relationships and haplotype polymorphism among cichlid Mhc class II B loci. Genetics 149:1527–1537

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLennan DA, McPhail JD (1990) Experimental investigations of the evolutionary significance of sexually dimorphic nuptial coloration in Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.): the relationship between male colour and female behaviour. Can J Zool 68:482–492

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail JD (1994) Speciation and the evolution of reproductive isolation in the stickleback (Gasterosteus) of south western British Columbia. In: Bell MA, Foster SA (eds) The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 399–437

  • Meerwijk JPM van, Marguerat S, Lees RK, Germain RN, Fowlkes BJ, McDonald HR (1997) Quantitative impact of thymic clonal deletion on the T cell repertoire. J Exp Med 185:377–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M, Bakker TCM (1990) Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature 344:330–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MA, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Austyn JM (1992) The optimal number of major histocompatibility complex molecules in an individual. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:10896–10899

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ober C, Weitkamp LR, Cox N, Cox H, Dytch H, Kostyu D, Elias S (1997) HLA and mate choice in humans. Am J Hum Genet 61:497–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsén KH, Grahn M, Lohm J, Langefors A (1998) MHC and kin discrimination in juvenile Artic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.). Anim Behav 56:319–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson S, Pemberton JM (1997) No evidence for major histocompatibility complex-dependent mating patterns in a free-living ruminant population. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1813–1819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penn D, Potts W (1998) How do major histocompatibility complex genes influence odor and mating preferences? Adv Immunol 69:411–435

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penn DJ, Potts WK (1999) The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. Am Nat 153:145–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penn DJ, Damjanovich K, Potts WK (2002) MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11260–11264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potts WK, Slev PR (1995) Pathogen-based models favoring MHC genetic diversity. Immun Rev 143:181–197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potts WK, Manning CJ, Wakeland EK (1991) Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature 352:619–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Reusch TBH, Häberli MA, Aeschlimann PB, Milinski M (2001a) Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism. Nature 414:300–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reusch TBH, Wegner KM, Kalbe M (2001b) Rapid genetic divergence in postglacial populations of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus): the role of habitat type, drainage and geographical proximity. Mol Ecol 10:2435–2445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rundle HD, Nagel L, Boughman JW, Schluter D (2000) Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287:306–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar M, Leong T, Tu N, Gelman RS, Watson ALM, Bronson R, Iglesias A, Mann M, Good RA, Yunis EJ (1995) Life-span, T-cell responses, and incidence of lymphomas in congenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:3992–3996

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer AG, Beauchamp GK, Yamazaki K (1997) Volatile signals of the major histocompatibility complex in male mouse urine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:2210–2214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh PB, Brown RE, Roser B (1987) MHC antigens in urine as olfactory recognition cues. Nature 327:161–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedekind C, Füri S (1997) Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1471–1479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wedekind C, Seebeck T, Bettens F, Paepke AJ (1995) MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proc R Soc Lond B 260:245–249

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner KM, Reusch TBH, Kalbe M (2003) Multiple parasites are driving major histocompatibility complex polymorphism in the wild. J Evol Biol 16:233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki K, Boyse EA, Miké V, Thaler HT, Mathieson BJ, Abbott J, Boyse J, Zayas ZA, Thomas L (1976) Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. J Exp Med 144:1324–1335

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Kupniewsky D, Bard J, Thomas L, Boyse EA (1988) Familial imprinting determines H-2 selective mating preferences. Science 240:1331–1332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Shen F, Bard J, Boyse EA (1991) A distinctive change in odortype determined by H-2D-L mutation. Immun Gen 34:129–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Shen F-W, Bard J, Boyse EA (1994) Discrimination of odortypes determined by the major histocompatibility complex amnong outbred mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:3735–3738

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Liedtke and C. Schmuck for laboratory assistance, H. Deiwick and D. Lemcke for technical support, and G. Augustin for maintaining the aquaria. K.M. Wegner and the referees gave valuable comments on the manuscript. P.A. and M.H. were supported by the Swiss National Fund. The experiments comply with the current laws of Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max-Planck-Institute for Limnology, Department of Evolutionary Ecology, August-Thienemann-Strasse 2, 24306 Plön, Germany

    P. B. Aeschlimann, M. A. Häberli, T. B. H. Reusch & M. Milinski

  2. Max-Planck-Institute for Immunobiology, Department of Developmental Immunology, 79108 Freiburg, Germany

    T. Boehm

Authors
  1. P. B. Aeschlimann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. A. Häberli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. B. H. Reusch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. Boehm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Milinski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Milinski.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Abrahams

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aeschlimann, P.B., Häberli, M.A., Reusch, T.B.H. et al. Female sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimize MHC allele number during mate selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54, 119–126 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0611-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0611-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation