Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of the Incidence and Predicted Risk of Early Surgical Site Infections After Breast Reduction

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In plastic surgery, clean, elective operations such as breast reductions are anticipated to have low risk factors for infections (1.1–2.1%). To further lower or prevent surgical site infections (SSI), the efficiacy of a prophylactic administration of antimicrobacterials remains a current controversial issue in plastic surgery. We report here the findings of a retrospective study in which we examined two groups of patients with breast reductions, one of which received a single-shot antimicrobacterial prophylaxis with cefuroxim preoperatively and the other who were given no antimicrobacterials. The aims were to determine the early SSI incidence of both groups, to classify breast reductions with respect to their inherent SSI risk by two widespread, combined risk scores, i.e., the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) score and the Study on the Efficiacy of Nosocomial Infection Control (SENIC) score, and to compare the actual SSI incidence to the predicted risk of the scores. In the divisions of plastic surgery at two hospitals, 153 patients (group I) and 136 patients (group II) could be included in the study in the 4-year period April 1997 to December 2001. Excluded were all patients with unilateral breast reduction or breast reconstruction and patients who were followed up less than 30 days postoperatively. The two groups were comparable with respect to demographic and clinical features such as age and risk factors, and there were no detectable significant intergroup differences in the general perioperative data. According to the NNIS and the SENIC scores, all operations were “clean,” and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was <3 in all patients. Although the mean duration of the operation was significantly different in the two groups (190 min in group I, 160 min in group II; p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney test; 75th percentile at and 4 and 3 h, respectively), it was longer than 2 h in both groups. The incidence of early infections was 3.9% in the first group, compared with 3.6% in the second group (p = 1.0, odds ratio = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.32–3.6). All infections were local and superficial; no general symptoms were noticed. Three patients had to be readmitted and two of these were reoperated. The rate of infections for both groups was higher than generally anticipated for this kind of clean operations and higher than predicted by the NNIS score for medium risk (predicted risk of 2.9%). The reason for this discrepancy is that the NNIS score is an inpatient risk score which does not include a postdischarge SSI surveillance. Using the NNIS definition of SSI we would have had an infection rate of 0% in both groups in our study. According to the SENIC score, breast reductions can be classified also as medium risk of SSI with a predicted risk of 3.9%, which showed a nearly perfect correspondence with the actual SSI incidence in both study groups. The reason for this increased, medium risk is the factor “operation time >2 h,” which is obviously an inherent risk factor in breast reductions. Among the multitude of patient and nonpatient SSI risk factors, in healthy women operation time was the only factor which could be clearly identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JS Garner (1986) ArticleTitleCDC guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985. Supercedes guideline for prevention of surgical wound infection published in 1982. Infect Control 7 IssueID3 193

    Google Scholar 

  2. TJ Krize N Koss MC Robson (1975) ArticleTitleThe current use of prophylactic antibiotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 55 IssueID1 22

    Google Scholar 

  3. R Platt JR Zucker DF Zaleznik CC Hopkins EP Dellinger AW Karchmer CS Bryan JF Burke MA Wikler SK Marino KF Holbrook TD Tosteson (1992) ArticleTitleProphylaxis against wound infection following herniorrhaphy or breast surgery. J Infect Dis 166 556

    Google Scholar 

  4. AJ Mangram TC Horan ML Pearson LC Silver WR Jarvis (1999) ArticleTitleGuideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidem 20 IssueID4 247

    Google Scholar 

  5. DH Culver TC Horan RP Gaynes WJ Marotone WR Jarvis TG Emori SN Banerjee JR Edwards JS Tolson TS Henderson JM Hughes (1991) ArticleTitleSurgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. Am J Med 91 152

    Google Scholar 

  6. RW Haley DH Culver WM Morgan JW White TG Emori TM Hooton (1985) ArticleTitleIdentifying patients at high risk of surgical wound infection. Am J Epidemiol 121 IssueID2 206 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiqB2cfjt1c%3D Occurrence Handle4014116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. C Lassus (1996) ArticleTitleA 30-year experience with vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 97 IssueID2 373 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC2MvitFY%3D Occurrence Handle8559820

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. M Lejour (1999) ArticleTitleVertical mammaplasty: Update and appraisal of late results. Plast Reconstr Surg 104 771

    Google Scholar 

  9. GM Beer W Morgenthaler I Spicher VE Meyer (2001) ArticleTitleModifications in vertical scar breast reduction. J Br Plast Surg 54 IssueID4 341 Occurrence Handle10.1054/bjps.2001.3573 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3msVWquw%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. I Pitanguy (1967) ArticleTitleSurgical treatment of breast hypertrophy. Br J Plast Surg 10 78

    Google Scholar 

  11. H Höhler (1977) ArticleTitleDie Reduktionsmammaplastik bei Hyperplasien der weiblichen Brust. Chirurg 48 377

    Google Scholar 

  12. WH Dietz MC Bellizzi (1999) ArticleTitleIntroduction: The use of body mass index to assess obesity in children. Am J Clin Nutr 70 123S Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXksVKgtbs%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. ALG Peel EW Taylor (1991) ArticleTitleProposed definitions for the audit of postoperative infection: A discussion paper. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 73 IssueID6 385

    Google Scholar 

  14. CN Baran Ö Senöz MG Ulusoy (1998) ArticleTitleProphylactic antibiotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 103 1561

    Google Scholar 

  15. K Andenaes PF Amland E Lingaas F Abyholm F Samdal K-E Giercksky (1995) ArticleTitleA prospective, randomized surveillance study of postoperative wound infections after plastic surgery: A study of incidence and surveillance methods. Plast Reconstr Surg 96 IssueID4 948

    Google Scholar 

  16. ML Mashford MB Robertson (1997) ArticleTitleSurveying antibiotic use in a general teaching hospital. Med J Aust 2 515

    Google Scholar 

  17. CP Page JM Bohnen JR Fletcher AT McManus JS Solomkin DD Wittmann (1993) ArticleTitleAntimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical wounds. Arch Surg 128 79 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC3Mbis1Q%3D Occurrence Handle8418785

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. M Shapiro TR Townsend B Rosner EH Kass (1979) ArticleTitleUse of antimicrobial drugs in general hospitals. N Engl J Med 301 (7) 351

    Google Scholar 

  19. BJ Fogarty K Khan G Ashall AG Leonard (1999) ArticleTitleComplications of long operations: A prospective study of morbidity associated with prolonged operative time. Br J Plast Surg 52 33 Occurrence Handle10.1054/bjps.1998.3019 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3nsFSmtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10343588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. AB Kaiser JL Herrington JK Jacobs JL Muherin AC Roach JL Sawyers (1983) ArticleTitleCefoxitin versus erythromycin, neomycin and cefazolin in colorectal operations. Ann Surg 198 525 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiuD383nslQ%3D Occurrence Handle6354113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. SC Bonawitz RH Schnarrs AI Rosenthal GK Rogers ED Newton (1991) ArticleTitleFree-tissue transfer in elderly patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 87 IssueID6 1074

    Google Scholar 

  22. EP Patchen Dellinger PA Gross TL Barrett PJ Krause WJ Marone JE McGowan RI Sweet PR Wenzel (1994) ArticleTitleQuality standard for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures. Infect Control Hosp Epidem 15 182

    Google Scholar 

  23. TJ Krizek LJ Gottlieb N Koss MC Robson (1985) ArticleTitleThe use of prophylactic antibacterials in plastic surgery: A 1980s update. Plast Reconstr Surg 76 IssueID6 953

    Google Scholar 

  24. OCS Cassell L Ion (1997) ArticleTitleAre antibiotics necessary in the surgical management of upper limb lacerations? Br J Plast Surg 50 523 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FosV2huw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9422950

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. TD Szucs (1997) Medizinische Ökonomie, eine Einführung Verlag Medizin und Wissen München

    Google Scholar 

  26. A Steenhoek (1990) ArticleTitleProphylactic antibiotics and the hospital budget: Controversy for patients and hospital financial strategies? Pharm Weekbl Sci 12 300 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6C28vhslA%3D Occurrence Handle2075083

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. PL Ergina S Gold JL Meakins (1990) ArticleTitleAntibiotic prophylaxis for herniorrhaphy and breast surgery. Letter. N Engl J Med 28 1884

    Google Scholar 

  28. H Boxma T Broekhuizen P Patka H Oosting (1996) ArticleTitleRandomised controlled trial of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical treatment of closed fractures: the Dutch Trauma Trial. Lancet 347 1133 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XjtVGrs74%3D Occurrence Handle8609746

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. SA Olson (1996) ArticleTitleOpen fractures of the tibial shaft: Current treatment. J Bone Joint Surg 78A IssueID9 1428

    Google Scholar 

  30. L Bergman JH Solhaug (1987) ArticleTitleSingle-dose chemoprophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 205 77 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiD1Mfptlw%3D Occurrence Handle3541803

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. RE Van Scoy CJ Wilkowske (1983) ArticleTitleProphylactic use of antimicrobial agents. Mayo Clin Proc 58 214

    Google Scholar 

  32. HC Polk JF Lopez-Mayor (1969) ArticleTitlePostoperative wound infection: A prospective study of determinant factors and prevention. Surgery 66 IssueID1 97 Occurrence Handle4892316

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gertrude M. Beer M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kompatscher, P., von Planta, A., Spicher, I. et al. Comparison of the Incidence and Predicted Risk of Early Surgical Site Infections After Breast Reduction . Aesth. Plast. Surg. 27, 308–314 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-3010-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-3010-5

Keywords

Navigation