Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Nipped in the Bud: Why Regional Scale Adaptive Management Is Not Blooming

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adaptive management is an approach to managing natural resources that emphasizes learning from the implementation of policies and strategies. Adaptive management appears to offer a solution to the management gridlock caused by increasing complexity and uncertainty. The concept of adaptive management has been embraced by natural resource managers worldwide, but there are relatively few published examples of adaptive management in use. In this article, we explore two watershed management projects in southeastern Australia to better understand the potential of adaptive management in regional scale programs through qualitative, case study–based investigation. The program logic of one case implies the use of passive adaptive management, whereas the second case claims to be based on active adaptive management. Data were created using participant observation, semistructured interviews with individuals and groups, and document review. Using thematic content and metaphor analysis to explore the case data, we found that each case was successful as an implementation project. However, the use of both passive and active adaptive management was constrained by deeply entrenched social norms and institutional frameworks. We identified seven “imperatives” that guided the behavior of project stakeholders, and that have consequences for the use of adaptive management. Reference to recent evaluations of the Adaptive Management Areas of the Pacific Northwest of the United States suggests that some of these imperatives and their consequences have broad applicability. The implications of our findings are discussed, and suggestions for improving the outcomes of regional scale adaptive management are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Allan C. 2004. Improving the outcomes of adaptive management at the regional scale. Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW. Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan C., A. Curtis. 2002. A review of the North East Salinity Strategy and its implementation 1997-2001, Johnstone Centre, Charles Sturt University, Albury

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan C., A. Curtis. 2003. Regional Scale Adaptive Management: Lessons from the North East Salinity Strategy. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 10:76–84

    Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO Heartlands Core Group. 2000. Draft Heartlands Five Year Plan for 2001-2005. CSIRO/MDBC, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO Land and Water. 2003. Billabong Land Information System. CSIRO. Viewed 13 February 2004. http://www.clw.csiro.au/heartlands/BLIS1.3/index.html

  • Curtis A., B. Shindler A. Wright. 2002. Sustaining local watershed initiatives: lessons from Landcare and Watershed councils. Journal of American Water Resources Association 38:1207–1216

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin N. K., Y. S. Lincoln. 2000. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. in N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. Pages 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs. 2002. Working for the essentials of life, Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs. Viewed 26 July 2004. http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/prospectus/defrawork.pdf

  • Dey I. 1993. Qualitative data analysis. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovers S. R., C. D. Mobbs. 1997. An alluring prospect? Ecology and the requirements of adaptive management. N. Klomp I. Lunt (eds.), Frontiers in ecology: building the links. Elsevier Science, Albury, NSW. Pages 39–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada. 2004. Ecoaction; a community funding program. Environment Canada, viewed 26 July 2004, < http://www.ec.gc.ca/ecoaction/index_e.html>

  • Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team (FEMAT). 1993. Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic and social assessment. US Department of Agriculture, Portland, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman D. 1997. Vital lies, simple truths: The psychology of self deception. Bloomsbury, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. N. 2000. Adaptive ecosystem management in the Pacific Northwest: a case study from coastal Oregon. Conservation Ecology 4(2). Viewed March 21 2004. http://www.consecol.org/Journal/vol4/iss2/art6/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H. 1999. Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management – antidotes for spurious certitude? Conservation Ecology 3(1). Viewed March 15 2001. http://www.consecol.org/Journal/vol3/iss1/art7

  • Gunderson L. H., C. S. Holling S. S. Light. 1995. Barriers & bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling C. S. 1978. Adaptive environmental management and assessment, Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. 1995. What barriers? What bridges? pages 3–34 in L. H. Gunderson, C.S. Holling, and S.S. Light (eds.), Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York

  • Lakoff G., M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K. N. 1993. Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. N. 1999. Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology. 3:2, viewed 16 August 2001, < http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art3,>

  • Lumsden, D., and M. Reid. 1996. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Centre for Land Protection and Research. Technical report no. 33

  • McLain R. J., R. G. Lee. 1996. Adaptive management: promises and pitfalls. Environmental Management 20:437–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan G. 1997. Images of organization. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, K. 2000. Metaphor analysis in psychology—method, theory, and fields of application. Qualitative social research, 1. Viewed November 2002. http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-00/2-00moser-e.htm

  • Nerlich B., 2004. War on foot and mouth disease in the UK, 2001: Towards a cultural understanding of metaphor. Agriculture and Human Values 21:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NHT. 2002. Extension of the Natural Heritage Trust, viewed 26 September 2002. http://www.nht.gov.au/extension.html

  • North East Catchment and Land Protection Board. 1997. North East Regional Catchment Strategy, North East Catchment and Land Protection Board, Wodonga, Vic

    Google Scholar 

  • North East Catchment Management Authority. 2001. Annual report 2001/2001. North East Catchment Management Authority

  • Oberlechner T., T. Slunecko N. Kronberger. 2004. Surfing the money tides: understanding the foreign exchange market through metaphors. The British Journal of Social Psychology 43:133–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Northwest Regional office of the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service 2002, Northwest Forest plan adaptive management area network strategy and plan of work, viewed 18 April 2004, < http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/plan/amaplanhtm>

  • Parma A. M., P. Amarasekare M. Mangel J. Moore W. Murdoch E. Noonburg M. A. Pascual H. P. Possingham K. Shea C. Wilcox D. Yu. 1998. What can adaptive management do for our fish. Forests, food and biodiversity? Integrative Biology 1:16–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton M. Q. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, Sage Publications, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipkin J. 1998. The Northwest Plan revisited, Office of the Interior, Office of Policy Analysis, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman G. B., S. F. Rallis. 2003. Learning in the field: an introduction to qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler B., M. Brunson G. H. Stankey. 2002. Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices: a problem analysis. USDA Forest Service, Corvallis, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman D. 2001. Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland E., 2004. Conception of the self in the Zhuangzi: conceptual metaphor analysis and comparative thought. Philosophy East and West 53:322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley J. P. 1980. Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake R. E. 1994. Case studies. N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. Pages 236–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey G. H. 2002 Adaptive management at the regional scale: breakthrough innovation or mission impossible? A report on an American experience. Agriculture for the Australian Environm ent, Fenner Conference on the Environment, Charles Strut University, Albury, Aust pp 159–177

  • Stankey G. H., B. Bormann R. Clare B. Shindler V. Sturtevant R. Clarke C. Philpot. 2003. Adaptive management and the Northwest Forest Plan: rhetoric and reality. Journal of Forestry 101:40–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Upper Billabong LWMP Working Group. 1999. Upper Billabong Land and Water Management Plan. Holbrook, NSW

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service. 2004. USDA Forest Service: regions, USDA. Viewed 29 July 2004. http://www.fs.fed.us/contactus/regions.shtml

  • USDA Forest Service. 2002. Northwest forest plan adaptive management area network strategy and plan of work. Viewed 18 August 2004. http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/plan/amaplan.htm

  • Walters C. J., R. Green. 1997. Valuation of experimental management options for ecological systems. Journal of Wildlife Management 61:987–1006

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters C. J., C. S. Holling. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060–2068

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood L. A., R. O. Kroger. 2000. Doing discourse analysis: methods for studying action in talk and text. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support received from the Charles Sturt University Academic Staff Writing-Up Award Scheme. Thanks are also extended to Steve Light and two anonymous reviewers for their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Charles Sturt University, P. O.789, Albury, NSW, 2640, Australia

    Catherine Allan & Allan Curtis

Authors
  1. Catherine Allan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Allan Curtis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Allan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allan, C., Curtis, A. Nipped in the Bud: Why Regional Scale Adaptive Management Is Not Blooming. Environmental Management 36, 414–425 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0244-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0244-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation