Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of Remote-Trip Cameras for Wildlife Surveys and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Conservation Activities at a Nature Reserve in Sichuan Province, China

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monitoring the effectiveness of management activities within reserves is always a complicated task. When the focus of management activities is mammals, it is difficult to monitor their populations in a way that is rapid, effective, and inexpensive. We report on a mammal survey of a reserve in southwest China using remote-trip cameras. We surveyed 329 locations over 2 field seasons in 2002 and 2003. Sixteen species of mammals were detected with these cameras, with four species documented for the first time. After accounting for variation due to slope, aspect, elevation, and habitat type, the distribution of six species was positively associated with the location of conservation stations and/or patrolling routes. Species of medium-sized mammals are excellent candidates for monitoring programs based on these cameras, due to their relative abundance, sufficient size to be detected by the camera units, and sensitivity to human activity. The distribution of mammals relative to management efforts is a relatively rapid means to assess reserve effectiveness. The repeat use of the cameras as part of a monitoring plan should provide a quantifiable measure of reserve effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atauri J. A., J. V. De Lucio, M. A. Munoz. 2005. A framework for designing ecological monitoring programs for protected areas: a case study of Galachos del Ebro Nature Reserve (Spain). Environ Manage 35:20–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone E. S., K. Christie, T. Conforti, et al. 2001. The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals. Anim Conserv 4:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro T. M. 1999. Conservation monitoring: Estimating mammal densities in woodland habitats. Anim Conserv 2:305–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo E., G. Wong, A. D. Cuaron. 2000. Monitoring mammal populations in Costa Rican protected areas under different hunting restrictions. Conserv Biol 14:1580–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ervin J. 2003. Rapid assessment of protected area management effectiveness in four countries. Bioscience 53:833–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foresman K. R., D. E. Pearson. 1998. Comparison of proposed survey procedures for detection of forest carnivores. J Wildl Manage 62:1217–1226

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu B., K. Wang, Y. Lu, et al. 2004. Entangling the complexity of protected area management: The case of Wolong Biosphere reserve, Southwestern China. Environ Manage 33:788–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller T. K. 1991. Do pellet counts index white-tailed deer numbers and population change? J Wildl Manage 55:393–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines W. L. 2001. Large carnivore surveys in North Karakorum Mountains, Pakistan. Nat Areas J 21:168–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Garshelis D. L. 2000. Delusions of habitat evaluation; measuring use, selection and importance. In L. Boitani, T. K. Fuller (eds), Research techniques in animal ecology; controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press, New York pp 111–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge T. 2000. Preliminary study of the behavioral ecology of wild golden monkeys. In The progress of foundation. Tangjaihe Nature Reserve, Qingchuan County, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China (in Chinese with English abstract) pp 165–170

  • Gibbs J. P. 2000. Monitoring populations. In Boitani L, Fuller TK (eds), Research techniques in animal ecology; controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 213–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Green R. E., A. Balmford, P. R. Crane, et al. 2005. A framework for improved monitoring of biodiversity: Responses to the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Conserv Biol 19:56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigione M. M., P. Burman, V. C. Bleich, et al. 1999. Identifying individual mountain lions Felis concolor by their tracks: Refinement of an innovative technique. Biol Conserv 88:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M. 2003. Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas. Bioscience 53:823–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth K. U., J. D. Nichols. 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey P. A., R. Alexander, J. T. Du Toit, et al. 2005. The cost efficiency of wild dog conservation in South Africa. Conserv Biol 19:205–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma S., X. Ma, W. Shi. 2001. A guide to mammal tracking in China. China Forestry Publishing House. Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace G. M., J. E. M. Baillie, S. R. Beissinger, et al. 2001. Assessment and management of species at risk. In M. E. Soule, G. H. Orians (eds), Conservation biology; research priorities for the next decade. Island Press, Washington, DC pp 11–30

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKensie D. I. 2005. What are the issues with presence–absence data for wildlife managers? J Wildl Manage 69:849–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manley P. N., M. D. Schlesinger, J. R. Roth. 2005. A field-based evaluation of a presence–absence protocol for monitoring ecoregional-scale biodiversity. J Wildl Manage 69:950–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manley P. N., W. J. Zielinski, M. D. Schlesinger. 2004. Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale. Ecol Appl 14:296–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Margoluis R., N. Salafsky. 1998. Measures of success: Designing, managing and monitoring conservation and development projects. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely J. A. 1989. Protected areas and human ecology: How national parks can contribute to sustaining societies of the twenty-first century. In Western D, Pearl M (eds), Conservation for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 150–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner-Gulland E. J., H. Resit Akcakaya. 2001. Sustainability indices for exploited populations. Trends Ecol Evol 16:686–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moruzzi T. L., T. K. Fuller, R. M. DeGraaf, et al. 2002. Assessing remotely triggered cameras for surveying carnivore distributions. Wildl Soc Bull 30:380–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H., C. Tucker, L. Carlson, J. Southworth, M. Karmacharya, B. Karna. 2004. Monitoring parks by remote sensing: Studies in Nepal and Honduras. Environ Manag 34:748–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Numata S., T. Okuda, T. Sugimoto, et al. 2005. Camera trapping: a non-invasive approach as an additional tool in the study of mammals in Pasoh Forest Reserve and adjacent fragmented areas in Peninsular Malaysia. Malayan Nature J 57:29–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish J. D., D. P. Braun, R. S. Unnasch. 2003. Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas. Bioscience 53:851–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Possingham H. P., S. J. Andelman, B. R. Noon, et al. 2001. Making smart conservation decisions. In M. E. Soule, G. H. Orians (eds), Conservation biology; research priorities for the next decade. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 225–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao M., Rabinowitz A., S. T. Khaing. 2002. Status review of the protected areas systems in Myanmar, with recommendation for conservation planning. Conserv Biol 16:360–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J. G., R. E. Bodmer. 1999. Towards wildlife management in tropical forests. J Wildl Manage 63:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Royle J. A., J. D. Nichols. 2003. Estimating abundance from repeated presence–absence data or point counts. Ecology 84:777–790

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson J. G., M. Trolle. 2005. Monitoring elusive mammals; unattended cameras reveal secret of some of the world’s wildest places. Am Sci 93:148–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller G. B., Q. Teng, K. G. Johnson, et al. 2000. The feeding ecology of giant pandas and Asiatic black bears in the Tangjaihe Peserve, China. The progress of foundation. Tangjaihe Nature Reserve, Qingchuan County, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China, pp 235–255

  • Schauster E. R., E. M. Gese, A. M. Kitchen. 2002. An evaluation of survey methods for monitoring swift fox abundance. Wildl Soc Bull 30:464–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartman S., A. Moreira, D. Nepstad. 2000. Rethinking tropical forest conservation: Perils in parks. Conserv Biol 14:1351–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng H., O. Noriyuki, H. Lu. 1999. The mammalian of China. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Stem C., R. Margoluis, N. Salafsky, et al. 2005. Monitoring and evaluation in conservation: A review of trends and approaches. Conserv Biol 19:295–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann D. E., C. A. Haas, D. C. Dalton, et al. 2004. Infrared-triggered cameras for detecting wildlife: An evaluation and review. Wildl Soc Bull 32:357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangjiahe NRAD (Nature Reserve Administrative Department). 2000. The progress of foundation. Tangjaihe Nature Reserve, Qingchuan County, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China

  • Tosh C. A., B. Reyers, A. S. van Jaarsveld. 2004. Estimating the abundances of large herbivores in the Kruger National Park using presence–absence data. Anim Conserv 7:55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trolle M., M. Kery. 2003. Estimation of ocelot density in the Pantanal using capture–recapture analysis of camera-trapping data. J Mammal 84:607–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weckerly F. W., M. A. Ricca. 2000. Using presence of sign to measure habitats used by Roosevelt elk. Wildl Soc Bull 28:146–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Wemmer C (ed). 1998. Deer; status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Deer Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Wemmer C., T. H. Kunz, G. Lundie-Jenkins, et al. 1996. Mammalian Sign. In D. E. Wilson, F. R. Cole, J. D. Nichols, et al. (eds), Measuring and monitoring biological diversity; standard methods for mammals. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, DC pp 157–176

    Google Scholar 

  • White L. J. T. 1994. Biomass of rain forest mammals in the Lope Reserve, Gabon. J Anim Ecol 63:499–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Friend’s of the National Zoo, Peking University, Sichuan Forestry Department, Fuji Film, and China Wildlife Conservation Association. Daniel Guertin performed some of the preliminary analyses. The patrolling staff at Tangjiahe Nature Reserve performed the hard work of moving the cameras. Reviewers substantially improved the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William J. McShea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dajun, W., Sheng, L., McShea, W.J. et al. Use of Remote-Trip Cameras for Wildlife Surveys and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Conservation Activities at a Nature Reserve in Sichuan Province, China. Environmental Management 38, 942–951 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0302-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0302-3

Keywords

Navigation