Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Multiscale Analysis of Restoration Priorities for Marine Shoreline Planning

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Planners are being called on to prioritize marine shorelines for conservation status and restoration action. This study documents an approach to determining the management strategy most likely to succeed based on current conditions at local and landscape scales. The conceptual framework based in restoration ecology pairs appropriate restoration strategies with sites based on the likelihood of producing long-term resilience given the condition of ecosystem structures and processes at three scales: the shorezone unit (site), the drift cell reach (nearshore marine landscape), and the watershed (terrestrial landscape). The analysis is structured by a conceptual ecosystem model that identifies anthropogenic impacts on targeted ecosystem functions. A scoring system, weighted by geomorphic class, is applied to available spatial data for indicators of stress and function using geographic information systems. This planning tool augments other approaches to prioritizing restoration, including historical conditions and change analysis and ecosystem valuation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbruzzese B, Leibowitz SG (1997) A synoptic approach for assessing cumulative impacts to wetlands. Environmental Management 21:457–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan JD (2004) Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:257–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen TFH, Hoekstra TW (1987) Problems of scaling in restoration ecology: a practical application. In Jordan WR III, Gilpin ME, Aber JD (eds), Restoration ecology: a synthetic approach to ecological research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 289–299

  • Argent DG, Bishop JA, Stauffer JR Jr, Carline RF, Myers WL (2003) Predicting freshwater fish distributions using landscape-level variables. Fisheries Research 60:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold CL, Boison PJ, Patton PC (1982) Sawmill Brook: an example of rapid geomorphic change related to urbanization. Journal of Geology 90:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall R, Pearson D (2000) Integrated geographical assessment of environmental condition in water catchments: linking landscape ecology, environmental modeling and GIS. Journal of Environmental Management 59:299–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P, Costanza R, Farber S, Green RE, Jenkins P, Jefferiss V, Jessamy J, Madden K, Munro N, Myers S, Naeem J, Paavola M, Rayment S, Rosendo J, Roughgarden K, Trumper, Turner RK (2002) Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297:950–953

  • Berry HD, Harper JR, Mumford TF Jr, Bookheim BE, Sewell AT, Tamayo LJ (2001) The Washington State ShoreZone Inventory User’s Manual. Nearshore Habitat Program. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisson PA, Quinn TP, Reeves GH, Gregory SV (1992) Best management practices, cumulative effects, and long-term trends in fish abundance in Pacific Northwest river systems. In: Naiman RJ (ed) Watershed management: balancing sustainability and environmental change. Springer, New York, pp 189–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch DF, Josselyn MN, Mehta AJ, Morris JT, Nuttle WK, Simenstad CA, Swift DJP (1994) Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loss, restoration and management in Louisiana. Journal of Coastal Research 20:1–103 (special issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolstad P (2005) GIS fundamentals: a first text on geographic information systems, 2nd edn. Eider Press, White Bear Lake

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth DB (1991) Urbanization and the natural drainage system—impacts, solutions, and prognosis. The Northwest Environmental Journal 7:93–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth DB, Karr JR, Schauman S, Konrad CP, Morley SA, Larson MG, Henshaw EJ, Nelson, Burges SJ (2001) Urban stream rehabilitation in the Pacific Northwest. United States Environmental Protection Agency Grant Report R82-5284-010, Seattle, WA

  • Booth DB, Hartley D, Jackson R (2002) Forest cover, impervious-surface area, and the mitigation of stormwater impacts. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38:835–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borde AB, Judd C, Sather NK, Thom RM (2009) East Kitsap County nearshore habitat assessment and restoration prioritization framework. PNWD-4053. Prepared for Kitsap County Department of Community Development by Battelle Pacific Northwest Division, Richland, WA

  • Borde AB, McEwen S (2006) Developing a restoration prioritization framework. Oral presentation at Restore America’s Estuaries 3rd National Conference on Coastal and Estuarine Habitat Restoration, New Orleans, LA, December 9–13

  • Bradshaw AJ (1987) The reclamation of derelict land and the ecology of ecosystems. In: Jordan WR III, Gilpin ME, Aber JD (eds) Restoration ecology: a synthetic approach to ecological research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 53–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LA, Gray RH, Hughes RM, Meador MR (2005) Introduction to effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems. In Brown LR, Gray RH, Hughes RM, Meador MR (eds) Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 47, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 1–6

  • Bulleri F (2006) Is it time for urban ecology to include the marine realm? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:658–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd KB, Kelly NM, Merenlender AM (2007) Temporal and spatial relationships between watershed land use and salt marsh disturbance in a Pacific Estuary. Environmental Management 39:98–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JR (1995) Coastal zone management handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins BD, Sheikh AJ (2005) Historical reconstruction, classification, and change analysis of Puget Sound tidal marshes. Report to Washington Department of Natural Resources, Aquatic Resources Division, Olympia, WA

  • Cooper NJ, Barber PC, Bray MJ, Carter DJ (2002) Shoreline management plans: a national review and engineering perspective. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Maritime Engineering 154:221–228

  • Coughanowr CA, Ngoile MN, Linden O (1995) Coastal zone management in Eastern Africa including the island states: a review of issues and initiatives. Ambio 24:448–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier MN (1990) A marine and estuarine habitat classification system for Washington State, Washington Natural Heritage Program. Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, 55 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Diefenderfer HL, Thom RM, Adkins JE (2003) Systematic approach to coastal ecosystem restoration. PNWD-3237. Prepared for the NOAA Coastal Services Center by Battelle Marine Sciences Laboratory, Sequim, Washington. http://www.csc.noaa.gov/coastal/expert/expert.htm. Accessed 16 Dec 2006

  • Diefenderfer HL, Thom RM, Hofseth KD (2005) A framework for risk analysis in ecological restoration projects in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In: Bruins RJF, Heberling MT (eds) Economics and ecological risk assessment: applications to watershed management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 57–105

  • Edwards AMC, Winn PSJ (2006) The Humber Estuary, Eastern England: strategic planning of flood defences and habitats. Marine Pollution Bulletin 53:165–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000) An assessment of the socio-economic costs and benefits of integrated coastal zone management. Final Report by Firn Crichton Robers Ltd. and the Graduate School of Environmental Studies, University of Strathclyde, Contract No. B4-3040/99/134414/MAR/D2. European Union Demonstration Programme on Integrated Management in Coastal Zones 1997–1999

  • Evans NR, Thom RM, Williams GD, Vavrinec J, Sobocinski KL, Miller LM, Borde AB, Cullinan VI, Ward JA, May CW, Allen C (2006) Lower Columbia River Restoration Prioritization Framework. PNWD-3652. Prepared by Battelle, Pacific Northwest Division for the Lower Columbia River Estuary Partnership, Portland, OR

  • Gergel SE, Turner MG, Miller JR, Melack JM, Stanley EH (2002) Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systems. Aquatic Sciences 64:118–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gosselink JG, Lee LC (1989) Cumulative impact assessment in bottomland hardwood forests. Wetlands 9:89–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosselink JG, Lee LC, Muir TA (1990) The regulation and management of bottomland hardwood forest wetlands: implications of the EPA-sponsored workshops. In: Gosselink JG, Lee LC, Muir TA (eds) Ecological processes and cumulative impacts: illustrated by bottomland hardwood wetland ecosystems. Lewis, Chelsea, pp 638–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer K, Stow D (2003) Vegetation type conversion in Los Penasquitos Lagoon, California: an examination of the role of watershed urbanization. Environmental Management 31:489–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman PM, Driscoll CT, Likens GE, Fahey TJ, Holmes RT, Eager C, Aber JD (2004) Nor gloom of night: a new conceptual model for the Hubbard Brook ecosystem study. BioScience 54:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale SS, Paul JF, Heltshe JF (2004) Watershed landscape indicators of estuarine benthic condition. Estuaries 27:283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer TR (1972) Stream channel enlargement due to urbanization. Water Resources Research 8:1530–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebeler D (2000) Populations on fragmented landscapes with spatially structured heterogeneities: landscape generation and local dispersal. Ecology 81:1629–1641

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi R, Labbe T, Carter-Mortimer A (2003) Shoreline alterations in Hood Canal and the Eastern Strait of Juan de Fuca. Point No Point Treaty Council Technical Report 03-1, Kingston, WA

  • Hollis GE (1975) The effect of urbanization on floods of different recurrence interval. Water Resources Research 66:84–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantz P, Goetz SJ, Jantz CA (2005) Urbanization and the loss of resource lands within the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Environmental Management 36:808–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen J (1992) Net shore-drift of San Juan and parts of Jefferson, Island, and Snohomish Counties, WA. Prepared for the Shorelands and Coastal Zone Management Program, Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA

  • Johnson LB, Gage SH (1997) Landscape approaches to the analysis of aquatic ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 37:113–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GE, Thom RM, Whiting AH, Sutherland GB, Berquam T, Ebberts BD, Ricci NM, Southard JA, Wilcox JD (2003) An ecosystem-based approach to habitat restoration projects with emphasis on salmonids in the Columbia River Estuary. PNNL-14412. Final report submitted to the Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon, November 2003, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA

  • Judd C, Woodruff DL, Thom RM, Anderson MG, Borde AB (2007) Restoration prioritization toolset: documentation and user’s guide 2007. PNNL-17054, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington. www.gomrc.org (SAV Restoration Prioritization Tool). Accessed 16 Dec 2008

  • Kareiva P, Marvier M (2007) Conservation for the people. Scientific American 297:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay R, Alder J (1999) Coastal planning and management. Spon Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennish MJ (2001) Coastal salt marsh systems in the U.S.: a review of anthropogenic impacts. Journal of Coastal Research 17:731–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentula ME, Brooks RP, Gwin S, Holland C, Sherman AD, Sifneos J (1992) An approach to improving decision making in wetland restoration and creation. United States EPA/600/R-92/150, Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR

  • Keuler RF (1988) Map showing coastal erosion, sediment supply, and longshore transport in the Port Townsend 30-by-60-Minute Quadrangle, Puget Sound Region, Washington. United States Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Map I-1198-E, Scale 1:100,000

  • Klein RD (1979) Urbanization and stream quality impairment. Water Resources Bulletin 15:948–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunert K (2005) A GIS approach to habitat restoration site selection and prioritization in the New York-New Jersey Harbor estuary. Master’s thesis. Duke University, Durham, NC

  • Lamy F, Bolte J, Santelmann M, Smith C (2002) Development and evaluation of multiple-objective decision-making methods for watershed management planning. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38:517–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold LB (1968) The hydrologic effects of urban land use: Hydrology for urban land planning—a guidebook of the hydrologic effects of urban land use. USGS Circular No. 554

  • Lin JP, Bourne SG, Kleiss BA (2006) Creating a wetland restoration decision support system using GIS tools. Report No. ERDC TN-EMRRP-EM-05, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS

  • Mann KH (2000) Ecology of coastal waters: with implications for management, 2nd edn. Blackwell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • May C, Peterson G (2003) Landscape assessment and conservation prioritization of freshwater and nearshore salmonid habitat in East Jefferson County. Prepared for the Jefferson County Natural Resources Department, Port Townsend, WA

  • Naeem S (2006) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in restored ecosystems: extracting principles for a synthetic perspective. In: Falk DA, Palmer MA, Zedler JB (eds) Foundations of restoration ecology. Island Press, Covelo, pp 210–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Bilby RE (1998) River ecology and management: lessons from the Pacific coastal eco-region. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1992) Restoration of aquatic ecosystems. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2003) Adaptive monitoring and assessment for the comprehensive Everglades restoration plan. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2004) River basins and coastal systems planning within the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Panel on River Basin and Coastal Systems Planning, Committee to Assess the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Methods of Analysis and Peer Review for Water Resources Project Planning, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

  • Nearshore Habitat Program (2001) The Washington State ShoreZone Inventory. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington. http://www.dnr.wa.gov/ResearchScience/Topics/AquaticHabitats/Pages/aqr_nrsh_inventory_projects.aspx. Accessed 15 Feb 2007

  • Paine RT, Ruesink JL, Sun A, Soulanille EL, Wonham MJ, Harley CDG, Brumbaugh DR, Secord DL (1996) Trouble on oiled waters: lessons from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:197–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 32:333–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Oceans Commission (2003) America’s living oceans: charting a course for sea change. A Report to the Nation, May 2003, Pew Oceans Commission, Arlington, VA

  • Post JC, Lundin CG (1996) Guidelines for integrated coastal zone management. Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies and Monographs. No. 9. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards C, Johnson L, Host G (1996) Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53(Suppl 1):295–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruckelshaus MH, McClure MM (2007) Sound science: synthesizing ecological and socioeconomic information about the Puget Sound ecosystem. United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA

  • Russell GD, Hawkins CP, O’Neill MP (1997) The role of GIS in selecting sites for riparian restoration based on hydrology and land use. Restoration Ecology 5:56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardá R, Avila C, Mora J (2004) A methodological approach to be used in integrated coastal zone management processes: the case of the Catalan Coast (Catalonia, Spain). Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 62:427–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schueler TR (1995) The peculiarities of perviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques 2:233–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedell JR, Reeves GH, Hauer FR, Stanford JA, Hawkins CP (1990) Role of refugia in recovery from disturbances: modern fragmented and disconnected river systems. Environmental Management 14:711–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipman H (2008) A geomorphic classification of Puget Sound nearshore landforms. Report 2008-01, Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership, Olympia, WA

  • Simenstad C, Logsdon M, Fresh K, Shipman H, Dethier M, Newton J (2006) Conceptual model for assessing restoration of Puget Sound nearshore ecosystems. Report 2006-03. Prepared in support of the Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership, Seattle, WA

  • Skalski JR, Coats DA, Fukuyama AK (2004) Criteria for oil spill recovery: a case study of the intertidal community of Prince William Sound, Alaska, following the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Environmental Management 28:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Society for Ecological Restoration International, Science and Policy Working Group 2004 The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Version 2, October 2004. www.ser.org. Accessed 5 Sept 2005

  • Stanley S, Brown J, Grigsby S (2005) Protecting aquatic ecosystems: a guide for Puget Sound planners to understand watershed processes. Ecology Publication No. 05-06-027, Olympia, WA

  • Steyer GD, Sasser CE, Visser JM, Swenson EM, Nyman JA, Raynie RC (2003) A proposed coast-wide reference monitoring system for evaluating wetland restoration trajectories. Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 81:107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terich TA (1987) Living with the shore of Puget Sound and the Georgia Strait. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom RM, Wellman KF (1996) Planning aquatic ecosystem restoration monitoring programs. IWR Report 96-R-23. Prepared for Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria, Virginia and Waterways Experimental Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MI

  • Thom RM (1997) System-development matrix for adaptive management of coastal ecosystem restoration projects. Ecological Engineering 8:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom RM (2000) Adaptive management of coastal ecosystem restoration projects. Ecological Engineering 15:365–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom RM, Zeigler R, Borde AB (2002) Floristic development patterns in a restored Elk River estuarine marsh, Grays Harbor, Washington. Restoration Ecology 10:487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom RM, Williams GD, Diefenderfer HL (2005a) Balancing the need to develop coastal areas with the desire for an ecologically functioning coastal environment: is net ecosystem improvement possible? Restoration Ecology 13:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom RM, Williams G, Borde A, Southard J, Sargeant S, Woodruff D, Laufle JC, Glasoe S (2005b) Adaptively addressing uncertainty in estuarine and near coastal restoration projects. Journal of Coastal Research 40:94–108

  • Thompson L, van Manen F, Shlarbaum S, De Poy M (2006) A spatial modeling approach to identify potential butternut restoration sites in Mammoth Cave National Park. Restoration Ecology 14:289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne CR, Abt SR, Barends FBJ, Maynord ST, Pilarczyk KW (1995) River, coastal, and shoreline protection: erosion control using riprap and armourstone. In Proceedings of the International Riprap Workshop, Colorado State University, 1993. Wiley, New York

  • Timm RK, Wissmar RC, Small JW, Leschine TM, Lucchetti G (2004) A screening procedure for prioritizing riparian management. Environmental Management 33:151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd S, Fitzpatrick N, Carter-Mortimer A, Weller C (2006) Historical changes to estuaries, spits, and associated tidal wetland habitats in the Hood Canal and Strait of Juan de Fuca regions of Washington State. PNPTC Draft Technical Report 06-01, Point No Point Treaty Council, Kingston, WA

  • Toth LA (1995) Principles and guidelines for restoration of river/floodplain ecosystems—Kissimmee River, Florida. In: Cairns J Jr (ed) Rehabilitating damaged ecosystems. Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 49–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg N, Moilanen A, Hanski I (1996) Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes. Science 273:1536–1538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilber P, Thayer G, Croom M, Mayer G (2000) Goal setting and success criteria for coastal habitat restoration. Ecological Engineering Special Issue 15(3–4):165

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GD, Thom RM, Evans NR (2004) Bainbridge Island nearshore habitat assessment, management strategy prioritization, and monitoring recommendations. PNWD-3391. Battelle Marine Sciences Laboratory, Sequim, WA

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge preceding work by Peter Best, Nathan Evans, Dave Shreffler, and Greg Williams, who developed aspects of these methods for earlier studies. Hugh Shipman contributed extensively to the geomorphic classifications used in this and earlier work. Neil Harrington ground-truthed early drafts of the stressors and functions scores based on the shoreline inventory he conducted. Stephen Stanley and Susan Grigsby developed the water processes component used in the watershed stressor index. John Cambalik, Stephen Stanley, and Steve Todd served as peer reviewers of the methodology. Kent Hale, Chaeli Judd, Doug Noltemeier, and Gretchen Peterson performed work in GIS. The development and management of this project were facilitated by Peter Skowlund and Jeffree Stewart of WADOE and Josh Peters and Michelle McConnell of the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. This research was supported by the Washington State Department of Ecology, Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Christopher W. May

    Present address: Seattle Public Utilities, 700 5th Ave Suite 4400, P.O. Box 34018, Seattle, WA, 98124-4018, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marine Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 1529 West Sequim Bay Road, Sequim, WA, 98382, USA

    Heida L. Diefenderfer, Kathryn L. Sobocinski, Ronald M. Thom, Christopher W. May, Amy B. Borde, Susan L. Southard, John Vavrinec & Nichole K. Sather

Authors
  1. Heida L. Diefenderfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathryn L. Sobocinski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ronald M. Thom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christopher W. May
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amy B. Borde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Susan L. Southard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. John Vavrinec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Nichole K. Sather
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heida L. Diefenderfer.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

See Table 6.

Table 6 Jefferson County marine shoreline stressor and function scoring descriptions and raw data summary
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diefenderfer, H.L., Sobocinski, K.L., Thom, R.M. et al. Multiscale Analysis of Restoration Priorities for Marine Shoreline Planning. Environmental Management 44, 712–731 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9298-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9298-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation