Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding Human–Landscape Interactions in the “Anthropocene”

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article summarizes the primary outcomes of an interdisciplinary workshop in 2010, sponsored by the U.S. National Science Foundation, focused on developing key questions and integrative themes for advancing the science of human–landscape systems. The workshop was a response to a grand challenge identified recently by the U.S. National Research Council (2010a)—“How will Earth’s surface evolve in the “Anthropocene?”—suggesting that new theories and methodological approaches are needed to tackle increasingly complex human–landscape interactions in the new era. A new science of human–landscape systems recognizes the interdependence of hydro-geomorphological, ecological, and human processes and functions. Advances within a range of disciplines spanning the physical, biological, and social sciences are therefore needed to contribute toward interdisciplinary research that lies at the heart of the science. Four integrative research themes were identified—thresholds/tipping points, time scales and time lags, spatial scales and boundaries, and feedback loops—serving as potential focal points around which theory can be built for human–landscape systems. Implementing the integrative themes requires that the research communities: (1) establish common metrics to describe and quantify human, biological, and geomorphological systems; (2) develop new ways to integrate diverse data and methods; and (3) focus on synthesis, generalization, and meta-analyses, as individual case studies continue to accumulate. Challenges to meeting these needs center on effective communication and collaboration across diverse disciplines spanning the natural and social scientific divide. Creating venues and mechanisms for sustained focused interdisciplinary collaborations, such as synthesis centers, becomes extraordinarily important for advancing the science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberti M, Marzluff J, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, Zumbrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53:1169–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie P, Brookfield H (1987) Defining and debating the problem. In: Blaikie P, Brookfield H (eds) Land degradation and society. Methuen, London, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Butzer KW (1990) The realm of cultural-human ecology: adaptation and change in historical perspective. In: Turner BL II, Clark W, Kates R, Richards J, Matthews J, Meyer W (eds) The earth as transformed by human action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 685–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Armbrust EV, Arzberger PW, Chappin FS III, Elser JJ, Hackett EJ, Ives AR, Kareiva PM, Leibold MA, Lundberg P, Mangel M, Merchant N, Murdoch WW, Palmer MA, Peters DPC, Pickett STA, Smith KK, Wall DH, Zimmerman AS (2009) Accelerate synthesis in ecology and environmental sciences. Biosci 59:699–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin A, Florsheim J, Wohl E, Collins BD (2013) Feedbacks in human–landscape systems. Environ Manag. doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0031-y

  • Church M (2002) Geomorphic thresholds in riverine landscapes. Freshw Biol 47:541–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke RU (1984) Geomorphological hazards in Los Angeles: a study of slope and sediment problems in a metropolitan county. Binghamton Symposia in Geomorphology, vol 7. Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Corenblit D, Baas ACW, Bornette G, Darrozes J, Delmotte S, Francis RA, Gurnell AM, Julien F, Naiman RJ, Steiger J (2011) Feedbacks between geomorphology and biota controlling Earth surface processes and landforms: a review of foundation concepts and current understandings. Earth Sci Rev 106:307–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) The “Anthropocene”. IGBP Newsl 41:17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond J (2005) Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed. The Penguin Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Ostrom E, Sturn PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Sci 302:1907–1912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egan T (2006) The worst hard time: the untold story of those who survived the great American Dust Bowl. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • European Science Foundation (ESF) (2010a) Landscape in a changing world: bridging divides, integrating disciplines, serving society. Science Policy Briefing October 2010. http://www.esf.org/?id=8738. Accessed 4 June 2013

  • European Science Foundation (ESF) (2010b) Responses to environmental and societal challenges for our unstable Earth (RESCUE), ESF-COST “Frontier of Science” Initiative 2009–2010. www.esf.org/rescue. Accessed 4 June 2013

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlak A (2013) Policy interactions in human–landscape systems. Environ Manag. doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0068-y

  • Goldsmith E, Hildyard N (1986) The social and environmental effects of large dams. Vol 2: case studies. Wadebridge Ecological Centre, Cornwall

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie A (2000) The human impact on the natural environment, 5th edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf W (2001) Damage control: restoring the physical integrity of America’s rivers. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 91:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50:571–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahs AK, McDonnell MJ, McCarthy MA, Vesk PA, Corlett RT, Norton BA, Clemants SE, Duncan RP, Thompson K, Schwartz MW, Williams NSG (2009) A global synthesis of plant extinction rates in urban areas. Ecol Lett 12:1165–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harden C, Mathews L (2000) Rainfall response of degraded soil following reforestation in the Copper Basin, Tennessee, USA. Environ Manag 26(2):163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooke R, Martín-Duque JF, Pedraza J (2012) Land transformation by humans: a review. GSA Today 22(12):4–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interagency Floodplain Management Review Committee (1994) Sharing the challenges: floodplain management into the 21st century. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • James LA (2011) Contrasting geomorphic impacts of pre-and post-Columbian land-use changes in Anglo America. Phys Geogr 32(5):399–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James LA, Marcus WA (2006) The human role in changing fluvial systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan TE, Sala OE, Stafford SG, Bubier JL, Crittenden JC, Cutter SL, Kay AC, Libecap GD, Moore JC, Rabalais NN, Shepherd JM, Travis J (2010) Recommendations for interdisciplinary study of tipping points in natural and social systems. EOS 91:143–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson RE, Kasperson JX, Turner BL II (1999) Risk and criticality: trajectories of regional environmental degradation. Ambio 28:562–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Killeen T, van der Pluijm B, Cavanaugh M (2012) A focus on science, engineering, and education for sustainability. EOS 93:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzig AP (2001) Bridging disciplinary divides to address environmental and intellectual challenges. Ecosystem 4:709–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf GM (1997) Hungry water: effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environ Manag 21:533–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf GM, Podolak K (2013) Space and time scales in human–landscape systems. Environ Manag. doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0078-9

  • Lach D (2013) Challenges for linking quantitative and qualitative data and methods for investigating human–landscape systems. Environ Manag. doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0115-8

  • Lemos MC, Recharte J, Chang CT (2007) Integration of social science in the UNESCO’s Ecohydrology programme. Report by the UNESCO’s Ecohydrology Social Science Task Force

  • Lew B, Costanza R, Ostrom E, Wilson J, Simon CP (1999) Human ecosystem interactions: a dynamic integrated model. Ecol Econ 31:227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Pell AN, Deadman P, Kratz T, Lubchenco J, Ostrom E, Ouyang Z, Provencher W, Redman CL, Schneider SH, Taylor WW (2007a) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–1516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Folke C, Alberti M, Redman CL, Schneider SH, Ostrom E, Pell AN, Lubchenco J, Taylor WW, Ouyang Z, Deadman P, Kratz T, Provencher W (2007b) Coupled human and natural systems. Ambio 36:639–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long Term Ecological Research Network (LTER) (2007) The decadal plan for LTER: integrative science for society and the environment. LTER Network Office Publication Series, vol 24. LTER, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J (1998) Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 279:491–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon D, Derickson KD (2012) From resilience to resourcefulness: a critique of resilience policy and activism. Prog Hum Geogr 37:253–270. doi:10.1177/0309132512454775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener WK, Baerwald TJ, Firth P, Palmer MA, Rosenberger JL, Sandlin EA, Zimmerman H (2001) Defining and unraveling biocomplexity. Bioscience 51:1018–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R, Clark WC, Cash DW, Dickson NM (eds) (2006) Global environmental assessments: information and influence. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Mngomezulu D (2003) Threshold conditions for initiation of valley-side gullies in the Middle Veld of Swaziland. Catena 50(2–4):401–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray AB, Knaapen MAF, Tal M, Kirwan ML (2008) Biomorphodynamics: physical-biological feedbacks that shape landscapes. Water Resour Res 44:W11301. doi:10.1029/2007WR006410

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (1999) Human dimensions of global environmental change: research pathways for the next decade. The National Academies Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2004) Facilitating interdisciplinary research. The National Academies Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2007) Evaluating progress of the U.S. climate change science program: methods and preliminary results. The National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2010a) Landscapes on the edge: new horizons for research on Earth’s surface. The National Academies Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2010b) The changing planet: strategic directions in the geographical sciences. The National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (2009) Dear colleague letter: Environment, Society, and the Economy (ESE) NSF 10-03. www.nsf.gov. Accessed 26 Mar 2012

  • Nordstrom K (1994) Beaches and dunes of human-altered coasts. Prog Phys Geogr 18:497–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSF Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education (AC-ERE) (2005) Complex environmental systems: pathways to the future. http://www.nsf.gov/geo/ere/ereweb/acere_synthesis_rpt.cfm. Accessed 10 Feb 2012

  • Peterson JM, Caldas M, Bergtold J, Sturm B, Graves R, Earnhart D, Hanley E, Brown JC (2013) Economic linkages to changing landscapes. Environ Manag. doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0116-7

  • Pfirman S, AC-ERE (2003) Complex environmental systems: synthesis for Earth, life, and society in the 21st century, a report summarizing a 10-year outlook in environmental research and education for the National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/geo/ere/ereweb/acere_synthesis_rpt.cfm. Accessed 10 Feb 2012

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecology, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Ann Rev Ecol and Syst 32:127–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzuto J (2002) Effects of dam removal on river form and process. Bioscience 52:683–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman CL (1999) Human dimensions of ecosystem studies. Ecosystem 2:296–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman CL, Grove JM, Kuby L (2004) Integrating social science into the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystem 7:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes DD, Williams GP (eds) (1979) Adjustments of the fluvial system. Kendall-Hunt, Dubuque

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer C (1956) The agency of man on the Earth. In: Thomas WL Jr (ed) Man’s role in changing the face of the earth, vol 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 49–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M (2009) Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JC, Wilcock PR (2008) Metrics for assessing the downstream effects of dams. Water Resour Res 44:W04404. doi:10.1029/2006WR005092

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm S (1979) Geomorphic thresholds: the concept and its applications. Trans Inst Br Geogr 4(4):485–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seto KC, Fragkias M, Güneralp B, Reilly MK (2011) A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE 6:e23777. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Jäger J, Carson DJ, Bradshaw C (2002) Challenges of a changing earth. Proceedings of the Global Change Open Science Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 10–13 July 2001. Springer, Berlin

  • Steffen W, Sanderson RA, Tyson PD, Jäger J, Matson PA, Moore B III, Oldfield F, Richardson K, Schellnhuber H-J, Turner BL, Wasson RJ (2004) Global change and the earth system: a planet under pressure. The IGBP global change series. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Crutzen P, McNeill J (2007) The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio 36:614–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Young OR, Druckman D (1992) Global environmental change: understanding the human dimensions. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas WL Jr (1956) Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2010) World Population Prospects, the 2010 Revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population, Division, Population Estimates and Projections Section. http://esa.un.org/wpp/. Accessed 3 Jan 2012

  • Vajjhala S, Krupnick A, McCormick E, Grove M, McDowell P, Redman C, Shabman L, Small M (2007) Rising to the challenge: integrating social sciences into NSF environmental observatories. A report by Resources for the Future for NSF. Available at: http://www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/NSFFinalReport.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2012

  • Van de Leeuw SE, Redman CL (2002) Placing archaeology at the center of socio-natural studies. Am Antiq 67:597–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek P, Mooney H, Lubchenco J, Melilo J (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9:5

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter RC, Merritts D (2008) Natural streams and the legacy of water-powered mills. Science 319:299–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams M, Zalasiewicz J, Haywood A, Ellis M (2011) The Anthropocene: a new epoch of geological time? Theme issue. Philos Trans R Soc A 369:833–1112

    Google Scholar 

  • Young OR, Berkhout F, Gallopín G, Janssen MA, Ostrom E, van der Leeuw S (2006) The globalization of socio-ecological systems: an agenda for scientific research. Glob Environ Chang 16:304–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Smith A, Barry TL, Coe AL, Bown PR, Brenchley P, Cantrill D, Gale A, Gibbard P, Gregory FJ, Hounslow MW, Kerr AC, Pearson P, Knox R, Powell J, Waters C, Marshall J, Oates M, Rawson P, Stone P (2008) Are we now living in the Anthropocene? GSA Today 18:4–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Haywood A, Ellis M (2011) The Anthropocene: a new epoch of geological time? Philos Trans R Soc A 369:835–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zvoleff A, An L (2013) Analyzing human–landscape interactions: tools that integrate. Environ Manag. doi:10.1007/s00267-012-0009-1

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Science Foundation (NSF awards EAR 0953254 and EAR 1045002) and the University of Oregon for the financial support of the workshop that led to this article. The authors also thank Y. Gao and L. Laurencio for producing Fig. 1, and four reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Tennessee, 304 Burchfiel Geog Bldg, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA

    Carol P. Harden

  2. Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, 80217, USA

    Anne Chin

  3. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

    Mary R. English

  4. Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA

    Rong Fu

  5. Department of Anthropology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

    Kathleen A. Galvin

  6. International Studies Association and Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Andrea K. Gerlak

  7. Department of Geography, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 974032-1251, USA

    Patricia F. McDowell

  8. Department of Physics and Physical Oceanography, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA

    Dylan E. McNamara

  9. Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506-4011, USA

    Jeffrey M. Peterson

  10. Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

    N. LeRoy Poff

  11. Department of Sociology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA

    Eugene A. Rosa

  12. Department of Geography, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, 10021, USA

    William D. Solecki

  13. Geosciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

    Ellen E. Wohl

Authors
  1. Carol P. Harden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Chin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mary R. English
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rong Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kathleen A. Galvin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andrea K. Gerlak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Patricia F. McDowell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dylan E. McNamara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jeffrey M. Peterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. N. LeRoy Poff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Eugene A. Rosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. William D. Solecki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Ellen E. Wohl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol P. Harden.

Additional information

Eugene A. Rosa—deceased.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harden, C.P., Chin, A., English, M.R. et al. Understanding Human–Landscape Interactions in the “Anthropocene”. Environmental Management 53, 4–13 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0082-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0082-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation