Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early Indicators of Treatment Success After Percutaneous Radiofrequency of Pulmonary Tumors

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We retrospectively reviewed the imaging of patients after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of lung metastases performed at our institution to assess the usefulness of ground glass opacification (GGO) margin for the prediction of complete tumor ablation. From January 2004 to March 2007, patients were identified where there was a postprocedure thin collimation scan to allow multiplanar reformatting, either immediately or at 24 h and at least 6 months of imaging follow-up. Thirty-six tumors in 22 patients were identified. The scans were assessed for the presence and width of GGO margin, and minimal and maximal dimensions were measured. A second reviewer, blinded to the outcome of the postprocedure assessment, reviewed the follow-up imaging for recurrence. The recurrence group had larger tumors (p = 0.045) and smaller mean minimal GGO margin width (p = 0.0001). Multivariate binary regression analysis confirmed that the minimal GGO margin was significantly (p < 0.005) associated with tumor recurrence. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis suggests a cutoff of 4.5 mm for complete tumor ablation. There was substantial agreement (κ = 0.759) between the site of absent GGO margin and the site of tumor recurrence. The point on the tumor surface where there is no GGO margin is likely to be the site of future recurrence. In our experience, a circumferential GGO margin of >5 mm is the minimal margion required to ensure complete tumor ablation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Steinke K, Sewell PE, Dupuy D et al (2004) Pulmonary radiofrequency ablation—an international study survey. Anticancer Res 24:339–343

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yan TD, King J, Sjarif A et al (2006) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma: prognostic determinants for survival. Ann Surg Oncol 13:1529–1537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamakado K, Hase S, Matsuoka T et al (2007) Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of unresectable lung metastases in patients with colorectal cancer: a multicenter study in Japan. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:393–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Simon CJ, Dupuy DE, DiPetrillo TA et al (2007) Pulmonary radiofrequency ablation: long-term safety and efficacy in 153 patients. Radiology 243:268–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yan TD, King J, Sjarif A et al (2007) Treatment failure after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for nonsurgical candidates with pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gillams AR, Lees WR (2008) Radiofrequency ablation of lung metastases: factors influencing success. Eur Radiol 18:672–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Okuma T, Matsuoka T, Yamamoto A et al (2008) Frequency and risk factors of various complications after computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31:122–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Baere T, Palussiere J, Auperin A et al (2006) Midterm local efficacy and survival after radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors with minimum follow-up of 1 year: prospective evaluation. Radiology 240:587–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamamoto A, Nakamura K, Matsuoka T et al (2005) Radiofrequency ablation in a porcine lung model: correlation between CT and histopathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1299–1306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bojarski JD, Dupuy DE, Mayo-Smith WW (2005) CT imaging findings of pulmonary neoplasms after treatment with radiofrequency ablation: results in 32 tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:466–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lencioni R, Crocetti L, Cioni R et al (2008) Response to radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary tumours: a prospective, intention-to-treat, multicentre clinical trial (the RAPTURE study). Lancet Oncol 9:621–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hiraki T, Sakurai J, Tsuda T et al (2006) Risk factors for local progression after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors: evaluation based on a preliminary review of 342 tumors. Cancer 107:2873–2880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gadaleta C, Mattioli V, Colucci G et al (2004) Radiofrequency ablation of 40 lung neoplasms: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:361–368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang S, Luo R, Liao W et al (2004) Single group study to evaluate the feasibility and complications of radiofrequency ablation and usefulness of post treatment position emission tomography in lung tumours. World J Surg Oncol 2:30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Okuma T, Okamura T, Matsuoka T et al (2006) Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for assessment of patients with unresectable recurrent or metastatic lung cancers after CT-guided radiofrequency ablation: preliminary results. Ann Nucl Med 20:115–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewan Mark Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, E.M., Lees, W.R. & Gillams, A.R. Early Indicators of Treatment Success After Percutaneous Radiofrequency of Pulmonary Tumors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32, 478–483 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-008-9482-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-008-9482-6

Keywords

Navigation