Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anatomic considerations and the relationship between the piriformis muscle and the sciatic nerve

  • Orignal Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stating background

The piriformis syndrome is one of the non-discogenics causes of sciatica. It results from the compression of the sciatic nerve (SN) by the piriformis muscle (PM) in the neutral and piriformis stretch test position. The evidence of the increase in pain in the test position requires a detailed anatomical study addressing the changes that occurred in the SN and PM anatomy during the test position. The aim of this study is to examine this relationship morphometrically.

Materials and methods

A total of 20 right and left lower limbs of ten adult cadavers were examined. The SN and the PM were made visible. The location of the SN was evaluated with respect to the consistent bony landmarks, including the greater and the lesser trochanter of the femur, the ischial tuberosity, the ischial spine of the hip bone, the posterior inferior iliac spine of the hip bone and the posterior superior iliac spine of the hip bone. The study was done in both neutral and test positions (i.e., 30° adduction 60° flexion and approximately 10° medial rotation position of the hip joint).

Results

The width of the greater sciatic notch was 63.09 ± 13.59 mm. The length of the lower edge of the PM was 95.49 ± 6.21 mm, and whereas the diameter of the SN where it emerged from the infrapiriforme was 17.00 ± 3.70 mm, the diameter decreased to 11.03 ± 2.52 mm at the level of the lesser trochanter of the femur. The SN intersected the PM most commonly in its medial second quarter anatomically. The vertical distance between the medial edge of the SN–PM intersection point and the ischial tuberosity was 85.62 ± 17.23 and 72.28 ± 7.56 mm (P < 0.05); the angle between the SN and the transverse plane was 66.36° ± 6.68° and 71.90 ± 8.48° (P < 0.05); and the vertical distance between the medial edge of the SN and the apex of the ischial spine of the hip bone was 17.33 ± 4.89 and 15.84 ± 4.63 mm (P > 0.05), before and after the test position, respectively.

Conclusion

This study provides helpful information regarding the course and the location of the SN. The presented morphometric data also revealed that after stretch test position, the infrapiriforme foramen becomes narrower; the SN becomes closer to the ischial spine of the hip bone, and the angle between the SN and the transverse plane increases. This study confirmed that the SN is prone to be trapped in the test position, and diagnosis of this situation requires dynamic MR and MR neurography study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arifoğlu Y, Sargon MF, Tanyeli E, Yazar F (1997) Double superior gemellus together with double piriformis and high division of the sciatic nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 19:407–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Babinski MA, Machado FA, Costa WS (2003) A rare variation in the high division of the sciatic nerve surrounding the superior gemellus muscle. Eur J Morphol 41(1):41–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barton PM (1991) Piriformis syndrome: a rational approach to management. Pain 47:345–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beaton LE, Anson BJ (1937) The relation of the sciatic nerve and of its subdivisions to the piriformis muscle. Anat Rec 70(supp1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beaton LE, Anson BJ (1938) The sciatic nerve and the piriformis muscle: their interrelation a possible cause of coccygodynia. J Bone Joint Surg 20:686–688

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benzon HT, Katz JA, Benzon HA, Iqbal MS (2003) Anatomic considerations, a new injection tecnique and a review of the literature. Anesthesiology 98:1442–1448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Broadhurst NA, Simmons N, Bond MJ (2004) Piriformis syndrome: correlation of muscle morphology with symptoms and signs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:2036–2039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen WS (1994) Bipartite piriformis muscle: an unusual cause of sciatic nerve entrapment. Pain 58:269–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Filler AG, Haynes J, Jordan SE, Prager J, Villablanca P, Farahani K, Mcbride DQ, Tsuruda JS, Morisoli B, Batzdorf U, Johnson JP (2005) Sciatica of nondisc origin and piriformis syndrome: diagnosis by magnetic resonance imaging with outcome study of resulting treatment. J Neurosurg Spine 2:99–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Foster MR (2002) Piriformis syndrome. Orthopedics 25(8):821–825

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jankiewicz JJ, Hennrikus WL, Houkom JA (1991) The apperance of the piriformis muscle syndrome in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res 262:205–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kendall FP, Kendall McCreart E, Geise PP (1993) Muscles testing and function, 4th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 219, 333, 365

  13. Kırıcı Y, Ozan H (1999) Double gluteus maximus muscle with associated variations in the gluteal region. Surg Radiol Anat 21(6):397–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kırıcı Y, Yazar F, Ozan H (1999) The neurovascular and muscular anomalies of the gluteal region: an atypical pudendal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 21(6):393–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kosukegawa I, Yoshimoto M, Isogai S, Nonaka S, Yamashita T (2006) Piriformis syndrome resulting from a rare anatomic variation. Spine 31(18):E 664–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mas N, Özekşi P, Özdemir B, Kapakin S, Sargon MF, Çelik HH, Yener N (2003) A case of bilateral high division of the sciatic nerves, together with a unilateral unusual course of the tibial nerve. Neuroanatomy 2:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ozaki S, Hamabe T, Muro T (1999) Piriformis syndrome resulting from an anomalous relationship between the sciatic nerve and piriformis muscle. Orthopedics 22(8):771–772

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Papadopoulos EC, Khan SN (2004) Piriformis syndrome and low back pain: a new classification and review of the literature. Orthop Clin Am 35:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parziale JR, Hudgins TH, Fishman LM (1996) The piriformis syndrome. Am J Orthoped 25(12):819–823

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Patriquin ML, Steyn M, Loth SR (2005) Metric analysis of sex differences in South African black and white pelvis. Forensic Sci Int 147:119–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pecina M (1979) Contribution to the explanation of the piriformis syndrome. Acta Anat 105:181–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pokorny D, Jahoda D, Veigl D, Pinskerova V, Sonsa A (2006) Topographic variations of the relationship of the sciatic nerve and the piriformis muscle and its relevance to palsy after total hip arthroplasty. Surg Radiol Anat 28(1):88–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Porta M (2000) A comparative trial of botulinum toxin type A and methylprednysolone for the treatment of myofacial pain from chronic muscle spasm. Pain 85:101–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sayson SC, Ducey JP, Maybrey JB, Wesley RL, Vermilion D (1994) Sciatic entrapment neuropathy associated with an anomalous piriformis muscle. Pain 59:149–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Standring S (editor-in-chief) (2005) Gray’s anatomy The anatomical basis of clinical practice, 39th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1403, 1404, 1446, 1447

  26. Uchio Y, Nishikawa U, Ochi M, Shu N, Takata K (1998) Bilateral piriformis syndrome after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:177–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Uluutku MH, Kurtoğlu Z (1999) Variations of nerves located in deep gluteal region. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 76(5):273–276

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vallejo MC, Mariano DJ, Kaul B, Sah N, Ramanathan S (2004) Piriformis syndrome in a patient after cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 29(4):364–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, 35340, Balçova/İzmir, Turkey

    Mustafa Güvençer, Pınar Akyer, Cihan İyem & Süleyman Tetik

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Yeditepe University, İstanbul, Turkey

    Sait Naderi

Authors
  1. Mustafa Güvençer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pınar Akyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cihan İyem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Süleyman Tetik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sait Naderi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Güvençer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Güvençer, M., Akyer, P., İyem, C. et al. Anatomic considerations and the relationship between the piriformis muscle and the sciatic nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 30, 467–474 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0350-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0350-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation