Skip to main content
Log in

Real-Time PCR Detection of the Effects of Protozoa on Rumen Bacteria in Cattle

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A real-time PCR approach was used in this study to clarify the populations of major bacterial species in the rumens of faunated and unfaunated cattle. The sensitivity of this novel real-time PCR assay was evaluated by using 101 to 108 plasmid copies of target bacteria. The numbers of plasmid copies of Ruminococcus albus, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Prevotella ruminicola, and the CUR-E cluster were higher in the unfaunated than in the faunated rumens. The CUR-E cluster belongs to the Clostridium group. In contrast, Fibrobacter succinogenes was higher in the faunated than in the unfaunated rumens.

Although it is well known that an absence of protozoa brings about an increase in the bacterial population, it was clarified here that an absence of protozoa exerted differential effects on the populations of cellulolytic bacteria in cattle rumens (i.e., F. succinogenes, R. albus, and R. flavefaciens). In addition, real-time PCR analysis suggested that the CUR-E cluster was more prevalent in the unfaunated rumens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Arakaki C, Mitsumori M, Itabashi H, Shirasaka S, Minato H (1995) Influence of the presence of protozoa on the rumen microbial population of cattle. J Gen Appl Microbiol 40:215–226

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caldwell DR, Bryant MP (1966) Medium without rumen fluid for nonselective enumeration and isolation of rumen bacteria. Appl Microbiol 14:794–801

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cotta MA (1988) Amylolytic activity of selected species of ruminal bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:772–776

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Demeyer DI (1981) Rumen microbes and digestion of plant cell walls. Agric Environ 6:295–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Forsberg CW, Cheng KJ, White BA (1997) Polysaccharide degradation in the rumen and large intestine. In: Mackie RI, White BA (eds) Gastrointestinal microbiology. New York: Chapman and Hall, pp 319–379

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kinoshita M, Imai S, Ishii T, Ogimoto K (1984) Functional morphology of the utilization of starch grain by rumen Entoniid ciliates in vitro. Jpn J Zootech Sci 55:846–876

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koike S, Kobayashi Y (2001) Development and use of competitive PCR assays for the rumen cellulolytic bacteria: Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens. FEMS Microbial Lett 204:361–366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kotarski SF, Waniska RD, Thurn KK (1992) Starch hydrolysis by the ruminal microflora. J Nutr 122:178–190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Orpin CG (1983) The role of ciliate protozoa and fungi in the rumen digestion of plant cell walls. Anim Feed Sci Technol 10:121–143

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ouwerkerk D, Klieve AV, Forster RJ (2002) Enumeration of Megasphaera elsdenii in rumen contents by real-time Taq nuclease assay. J Appl Microbiol 92:753–758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozutsumi Y, Tajima K, Takenaka A, Itabashi H (2005) The effect of protozoa on the composition of rumen bacteria in cattle using 16S rRNA gene clone libraries. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 69:499–506

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM (1994) Taxonomic notice: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rDNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:846–849

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tajima K, Aminov RI, Nagamine T, Matsui H, Nakamura M, Benno Y (2001) Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2766–2774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Takenaka A, D’Silva CG, Kudo H, Itabashi H, Cheng KJ (1999) Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of an endo-β-1, 4-glucanase cDNA from Epidinium caudatum. J Gen Appl Microbiol 45:57–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ushida K, Jouany JP, Demeyer DI (1991) Effects of presence or absence of rumen protozoa on the efficiency of utilization of concentrate and fibrous feeds. In: Tsuda T, Sasaki Y, Kawashima R (eds) Physiological aspects of digestion and metabolism in ruminants. New York: Academic Press, pp 625–654

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Gylswyk NO (1990) Enumeration and presumptive identification of some functional groups of bacteria in the rumen of dairy cows fed grass silage-based diets. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:243–254

    Google Scholar 

  17. Williams AG, Coleman GS (1997) The rumen protozoa. In: Hobson PN, Stewart CS (eds) The rumen microbial ecosystem, 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall, pp 73–139

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff and students at the Field Science Center of the Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology for their help with the animal care and sampling.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hisao Itabashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozutsumi, Y., Tajima, K., Takenaka, A. et al. Real-Time PCR Detection of the Effects of Protozoa on Rumen Bacteria in Cattle. Curr Microbiol 52, 158–162 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-005-0266-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-005-0266-9

Keywords

Navigation