Skip to main content
Log in

Inventory routing for the last mile delivery of humanitarian relief supplies

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fast and equitable distribution of the humanitarian relief supplies is key to the success of relief operations. Delayed and inequitable deliveries can result in suffering of affected people and loss of lives. In this study, we analyze the routing operations for the delivery of relief supplies from a distribution center to the dispensing sites. We assume that the relief supplies to be distributed arrive at the distribution center in batches and are consumed at the dispensing sites with a certain daily rate. When forming delivery schedules, we use the ratio of the inventory to the daily consumption rate at the dispensing sites as our decision criterion. This ratio is called the slack and can be considered as the safety stock (when positive) in case of a delay in the deliveries. Negative value for the slack means the dispensing site has stock-outs. Our objective is to maximize the minimum value of this slack among all dispensing sites. This is equivalent to maximizing the minimum safety stock or minimizing the maximum duration of the stock-outs. Due to multi-period structure of the problem, it is modeled as a variant of the Inventory Routing Problem. To address the problem, we propose a general framework which includes clustering, routing and improvement steps. The proposed framework considers the interdependence between all three types of decisions (clustering, routing and resource allocation) and makes the decisions in an integrated manner. We test the proposed framework on randomly generated instances and compare its performance against the benchmark algorithms in the literature. The proposed framework not only outperforms the benchmark algorithms by at least 1% less optimality gap but also provides high-quality solutions with around 2–3% optimality gaps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afshar A, Haghani A (2012) Modeling integrated supply chain logistics in real-time large-scale disaster relief operations. Socio Econ Plan Sci 46(4):327–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Monitor (2019) Why Iranian authorities failed to minimize flood damage. https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2019/04/iran-floods-response-disaster-management-prevention.html

  • Altay N, Green W (2006) OR/MS research in disaster operations management. Eur J Oper Res 175(1):475–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Anaya-Arenas A, Renaud J, Ruiz A (2014) Relief distribution networks: a systematic review. Ann Oper Res 223(1):53–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Archetti C, Bertazzi L, Hertz A, Speranza M (2012) A hybrid heuristic for an inventory routing problem. INFORMS J Comput 24(1):101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcik B, Beamon B (2008) Facility location in humanitarian relief. Int J Log Res Appl 11(2):101–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcik B, Beamon B, Smilowitz K (2008) Last mile distribution in humanitarian relief. J Intell Transp Syst 12(2):51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamon B, Balcik B (2008) Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains. Int J Public Sector Manag 21(1):4–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkoune D, Renaud J, Rekik M, Ruiz A (2012) Transportation in disaster response operations. Socio Econ Plan Sci 46(1):23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertazzi L, Speranza M (2012) Inventory routing problems: an introduction. EURO J Transp Log 1(4):307–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertazzi L, Speranza M (2013) Inventory routing problems with multiple customers. EURO J Transp Log 2(3):255–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramel J, Simchi-Levi D (1995) A location based heuristic for general routing problems. Oper Res 43(4):649–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A, Jones P (2011) Prepositioning supplies in preparation for disasters. Eur J Oper Res 209(2):156–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A, Vandenbussche D, Hermann W (2008) Routing for relief efforts. Transp Sci 42(2):127–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Cankaya E, Ekici A, Ozener O (2019) Humanitarian relief supplies distribution: an application of inventory routing problem. Ann Oper Res 283(1–2):119–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho L, Cordeau J-F, Laporte G (2014) Thirty years of inventory routing. Transp Sci 48(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekici A, Ozener O, Kuyzu G (2015) Cyclic delivery schedules for an inventory routing problem. Transp Sci 49(4):817–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Elci O, Noyan N, Bulbul K (2018) Chance-constrained stochastic programming under variable reliability levels with an application to humanitarian relief network design. Comput Oper Res 96:91–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Haghani A, Oh S (1996) Formulation and solution of a multi-commodity, multi-modal network model for disaster relief operations. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 30(3):231–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Holguin-Veras J, Jaller M, Wassenhove LV, Perez N, Wachtendorf T (2012) On the unique features of post-disaster humanitarian logistics. J Oper Manag 30(7–8):494–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Holguin-Veras J, Taniguchi E, Jaller M, Aros-Vera F, Ferreira F, Thompson R (2014) The Tohoku disasters: chief lessons concerning the post disaster humanitarian logistics response and policy implications. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 69:86–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang M, Smilowitz K, Balcik B (2012) Models for relief routing: equity, efficiency and efficacy. Transp Res Part E Log Transp Rev 48(1):2–18

    Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (2000) Introduction to disaster preparedness: disaster preparedness training programme. https://www.ifrc.org/Global/Publications/disasters/all.pdf

  • Jung J, Mathur K (2007) An efficient heuristic algorithm for a two-echelon joint inventory and routing problem. Transp Sci 41(1):55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Chu F, Chen H (2011) A solution approach to the inventory routing problem in a three-level distribution system. Eur J Oper Res 210(3):736–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Batta R, Rogerson P, Blatt A, Flanigan M (2012) Location of temporary depots to facilitate relief operations after an earthquake. Socio Econ Plan Sci 46(2):112–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Montjoy A, Brown S, Herrmann J (2009) Solving the inventory slack routing problem for medication distribution planning. Technical report, University of Maryland

  • Nair D, Rey D, Dixit V (2017) Fair allocation and cost-effective routing models for food rescue and redistribution. IISE Trans 49(12):1172–1188

    Google Scholar 

  • Naji-Azimi Z, Renaud J, Ruiz A, Salari M (2012) A covering tour approach to the location of satellite distribution centers to supply humanitarian aid. Eur J Oper Res 222(3):596–605

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2016) The nation’s medical countermeasure stockpile: opportunities to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and sustainability of the CDC Strategic National Stockpile: workshop summary. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

  • Nolz P, Semet F, Doerner K (2011) Risk approaches for delivering disaster relief supplies. OR Spectr 33(3):543–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyan N, Kahvecioglu G (2018) Stochastic last mile relief network design with resource reallocation. OR Spectr 40(1):187–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Orgut I, Ivy J, Uzsoy R, Wilson J (2016) Modeling for the equitable and effective distribution of donated food under capacity constraints. IIE Trans 48(3):252–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdamar L, Demir O (2012) A hierarchical clustering and routing procedure for large scale disaster relief logistics planning. Transp Res Part E Log Transp Rev 48(3):591–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdamar L, Ekinci E, Kucukyazici B (2004) Emergency logistics planning in natural disasters. Ann Oper Res 29(1–4):217–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozguven E, Ozbay K (2013) A secure and efficient inventory management system for disasters. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 29:171–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Rodriguez N, Holguin-Veras J (2016) Inventory-allocation distribution models for postdisaster humanitarian logistics with explicit consideration of deprivation costs. Transp Sci 50(4):1261–1285

    Google Scholar 

  • Raa B, Dullaert W (2017) Route and fleet design for cyclic inventory routing. Eur J Oper Res 256(2):404–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Rath S, Gutjahr W (2014) A math-heuristic for the warehouse location-routing problem in disaster relief. Comput Oper Res 42:25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls C, Turnquist M (2010) Pre-positioning of emergency supplies for disaster response. Transp Res Part B Methodol 44(4):521–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen Z, Dessouky M, Ordonez F (2009) A two-stage vehicle routing model for large-scale bioterrorism emergencies. Networks 54(4):255–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Solyali O, Sural H (2011) A branch-and-cut algorithm using a strong formulation and an a priori tour-based heuristic for an inventory-routing problem. Transp Sci 45(3):335–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Sphere Association (2018) The sphere handbook: humanitarian charter and minimum standards in humanitarian response, Geneva. www.spherestandards.org/handbook

  • Tan M, Davey M, Weaver M (2015) Nepal earthquake: tensions rise over slow pace of aid. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2015/apr/29/nepal-earthquake-humanitarian-crisis-engulfing-8-million-people-rolling-report. Accessed on 15 Aug 2017

  • The Guardian (2019) At least 62 people killed in Iran floods as US accused of blocking aid. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/04/iran-floods-death-toll-reaches-62

  • The Washington Post (2017) Puerto Rico’s roadways alone are a disaster, and it will cost at least \$240 million to fix them. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dr-gridlock/wp/2017/09/29/puerto-ricos-roadways-alone-are-a-disaster-and-it-will-cost-at-least-240-million-to-fix-them/

  • Torre L, Dolinskaya I, Smilowitz K (2012) Disaster relief routing: integrating research and practice. Socio Econ Plan Sci 46(1):88–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng G, Cheng H, Huang T (2007) Multi-objective optimal planning for designing relief delivery systems. Transp Res Part E Log Transp Rev 43(6):673–686

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (2012) Japan: post-earthquake coordination saves lives. https://www.unocha.org/story/japan-post-earthquake-coordination-saves-lives

  • Vitoriano B, Ortuno M, Tirado G, Montero J (2011) A multi-criteria optimization model for humanitarian aid distribution. J Glob Optim 51(2):189–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Feng L (2013) Inventory routing problem: routing and scheduling approach with the objective of slack maximization. J Transp Res Board Transp Res Rec 2378(1):32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Zhu S (2016) Solution to the multidepot inventory slack-routing problem at the planning stage. J Comput Civ Eng 30(1):04014115

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi W, Kumar A (2007) Ant colony optimization for disaster relief operations. Transp Res Part E Log Transp Rev 43(6):660–672

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Ekici.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This research is supported in part by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) Grant 115M535.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ekici, A., Özener, O.Ö. Inventory routing for the last mile delivery of humanitarian relief supplies. OR Spectrum 42, 621–660 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-020-00572-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-020-00572-2

Keywords

Navigation