Skip to main content
Log in

Q-Elastosonography of Solid Thyroid Nodules: Assessment of Diagnostic Efficacy and Interobserver Variability in a Large Patient Cohort

  • Ultrasound
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy and interobserver agreement of Q-elastography in the differentiation of benign from malignant thyroid nodules.

Methods

A total of 344 thyroid nodules in 288 patients were examined with grey-scale and colour Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) and Q-elastography by two independent operators. Nodules with hypoechogenicity, poorly defined margins, microcalcifications, and intralesional vascularity were classified as suspicious. Diagnostic performances of CDUS features and Q-elastography for predicting thyroid malignancy were estimated using ROC analysis. Cytology or histopathology was the reference standard. Interobserver agreement in the evaluation of CDUS and Q-elastography was assessed using Cohen's k-statistic.

Results

Q-elastography showed excellent diagnostic performance for the prediction of thyroid malignancy, with sensitivity of 93 % and specificity of 92 % for operator 1 (best cutoff at 2.02), and sensitivity of 84 % and specificity of 79 % for operator 2 (best cutoff at 1.86). Performance of Q-elastography was superior to that of CDUS. Reproducibility of the findings was excellent for both Q-elastography and CDUS features as assessed with Cohen's k, which was highest for strain ratio measurements (0.95) and lowest for the echogenicity score (0.83).

Conclusions

Q-elastography showed excellent performance. It is a valid and reproducible diagnostic method as well as a promising tool for identifying suspicious solid thyroid nodules needing cytological assessment and surgery.

Key Points

• Elastography is an additional tool for optimal characterisation of malignant thyroid nodules.

• The use of semiquantitative elastographic evaluation increases the diagnostic performance,

• The interobserver agreement of quantitative elastography can be considered to be good.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wiest PW, Hartshorne MF, Inskip PD et al (1998) Thyroid palpation versus high-resolution thyroid ultrasonography in the detection of nodules. J Ultrasound Med 17:487–496

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tomimori E, Pedrinola F, Cavaliere H, Knobel M, Medeiros-Neto G (1995) Prevalence of incidental thyroid disease in a relatively low iodine intake area. Thyroid 5:273–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brander A, Viikinkoski P, Nickels J, Kivisaari L (1991) Thyroid gland: US screening in a random adult population. Radiology 181:683–687

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tumbridge WM, Evered DC, Hall R et al (1997) The spectrum of thyroid disease in a community: the Whickham Survey. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 7:481–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fish SA, Langer JE, Mandel SJ (2008) Sonographic imaging of thyroid nodules and cervical lymph nodes. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am 37:401–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cappelli C, Castellano M, Pirola I et al (2007) The predictive value of ultrasound findings in the management of thyroid nodules. QJM 100:29–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoang JK, Lee WK, Lee M, Johnson D, Farrell S (2007) US features of thyroid malignancy: pearls and pitfalls. Radiographics 27:847–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim MJ, Kim EK, Park SI et al (2008) US-guided fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: indications, techniques, results. Radiographics 28:1869–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gharib H, Papini E, Valcavi R, AACE/AME Task Force on Thyroid Nodules. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi et al (2006) Medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules. Endocr Pract 12:63–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cai XJ, Valiyaparambath N, Nixon P, Waghorn A, Giles T, Helliwell T (2006) Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules. Cytopathology 17:251–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garra BS (2011) Elastography: current status, future prospects, and making it work for you. Ultrasound Q 27:177–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R et al (2005) Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography. Radiology 237:202–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R et al (2007) Cervical lymph node metastases: diagnosis at sonoelastography – initial experience. Radiology 243:258–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E et al (2006) Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239:341–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dighe M, Unmin B, Richardson ML et al (2008) Differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules with US elastography using carotid artery pulsation. Radiology 248:662–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hong Y, Liu X, Li Z, Zhang X, Chen M, Luo Z (2009) Real-time ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. J Ultrasound Med 28:861–867

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo S, Kim EH, Dighe M, Kim Y (2011) Thyroid nodule classification using ultrasound elastography via linear discriminant analysis. Ultrasonics 51:425–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rago T, Santini F, Scutari M, Pinchera A, Vitti P (2007) Elastography: new developments in ultrasound for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:2917–2922

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Friedrich-Rust M, Sperber A, Holzer L et al (2010) Real-time elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the assessment of thyroid nodules. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 118:602–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Asteria C, Giovanardi A, Pizzocaro A et al (2008) US-elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Thyroid 18:523–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubaltelli L, Corradin S, Dorigo A et al (2008) Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules at elastography. Ultraschall Med 30:175–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tranquart F, Bleuzen A, Pierre-Renoult P, Chabrolle C, Sam GM, Lecomte P (2008) Elastography of thyroid lesions. J Radiol 89:35–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dighe M, Bae U, Richardson ML, Dubinsky TJ, Minoshima S, Kim Y (2008) Differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules with US elastography using carotid artery pulsation. Radiology 248:662–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cantisani V, D'Andrea V, Biancari F et al (2012) Prospective evaluation of multiparametric ultrasound and quantitative elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: Preliminary experience. Eur J Radiol 81:2678–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cantisani V, Ulisse S, Guaitoli E, De Vito C, Caruso R et al (2012) Q-Elastography in the presurgical diagnosis of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. PLoS ONE 7:e50725

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Park SH, Kim SJ, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Son EJ, Kwak JY (2009) Interobserver agreement in assessing the sonographic and elastographic features of malignant thyroid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:W416–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cooper D, Doherty GM, Haugen BR et al (2009) Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 1911:1167–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Landis J, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fleiss JL (1986) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bojunga J, Herrmann E, Meyer G et al (2010) Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis. Thyroid 20:1145–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Moon HJ, Sung JM, Kim EK, Yoon JH, Youk JH, Kwak JY (2012) Diagnostic performance of gray-scale US and elastography in solid thyroid nodules. Radiology 262:1002–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Merino S, Arrazola J, Càrdenas A et al (2011) Utility and interobserver agreement of ultrasound elastography in the detection of malignant thyroid nodules in clinical care. Am J of Neuroradiol 32:2142–2148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ragazzoni F, Deandrea M, Mormile A et al (2012) High diagnostic accuracy and interobserver reliability of real-time elastography in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Ultrasound Med Biol 38:1154–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lim DJ, Luo S, Kim MH, Ko SH, Kim Y (2012) Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility in thyroid ultrasound elastography. Am J Roentgenol 198:896–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Corrado De Vito for his evaluable contribution to the statistical elaboration of our results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vito Cantisani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cantisani, V., Grazhdani, H., Ricci, P. et al. Q-Elastosonography of Solid Thyroid Nodules: Assessment of Diagnostic Efficacy and Interobserver Variability in a Large Patient Cohort. Eur Radiol 24, 143–150 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2991-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2991-y

Keywords

Navigation