Abstract
Objectives
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging in detecting deep myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer, using surgical-pathological staging as reference standard.
Methods
After searching a wide range of electronic databases and screening titles/abstracts, we obtained full papers for potentially eligible studies and evaluated according to predefined inclusion criteria. Quality assessment was conducted by adapting the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist. From each study, we extracted information on diagnostic performance of DW and DCE sequences. After exploring heterogeneity, we adopted a bivariate generalized linear mixed model to compare the effect of the two MR sequences jointly on sensitivity and specificity.
Results
Nine studies (442 patients) were considered. Significant evidence of heterogeneity was found only for specificity, both in DW and DCE imaging (I 2 = 70.8 % and 70.6 %). Pooled sensitivity of DW and DCE was 0.86 and specificity did not significantly differ (p = 0.16) between the two sequences (DW = 0.86 and DCE = 0.82). No difference was found between 3-T and 1.5-T MR. There was no evidence of publication bias.
Conclusions
MR diagnostic accuracy in presurgical detection of deep myometrial infiltration in endometrial cancer is high. DCE and DW imaging do not differ in sensitivity and specificity.
Key Points
• Myometrial invasion is the most important morphological prognostic feature of endometrial cancer
• MR diagnostic accuracy in presurgical detection of deep myometrial infiltration is high
• MR examination including T2 and DCE imaging is considered the reference standard
• DW imaging has been increasingly employed with heterogeneous results
• This meta-analysis shows that DCE and DW do not differ in diagnostic accuracy
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ADC:
-
apparent diffusion coefficient
- AIC:
-
Akaike information criterion
- CI:
-
confidence interval
- CT:
-
computed tomography
- DCE:
-
dynamic contrast-enhanced
- DOR:
-
diagnostic odds ratio
- DW:
-
diffusion-weighted
- ESS:
-
effective sample size
- FIGO:
-
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics
- GLMM:
-
generalized linear mixed model
- LR+ and LR−:
-
positive and negative likelihood ratio
- MR:
-
magnetic resonance
- QUADAS-2:
-
Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2
- ROC:
-
receiver operating characteristic
- SNR:
-
signal to noise ratio
- US:
-
ultrasound
References
Ferlay J, Shin H-R, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127:2893–2917
American Cancer Society (2013) Cancer facts & figures. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-036845.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2013
Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J et al (2013) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 49:1374–1403
Amant F, Mirza MR, Creutzberg CL (2012) Cancer of the corpus uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 119:S110–S117
Ludwig H (1995) Prognostic factors in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Obstet 49:S1–S7
Larson DM, Connor GP, Broste SK, Krawisz BR, Johnson KK (1996) Prognostic significance of gross myometrial invasion with endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 88:394–398
Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Homesley HD, Graham JE, Heller PB (1987) Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 60:2035–2041
Kinkel K, Kaji Y, Yu KK, Segal MR, Lu Y, Powell CB et al (1999) Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiology 212:711–718
Kinkel K, Forstner R, Danza FM et al (2009) Staging of endometrial cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Imaging. Eur Radiol 19:1565–1574
Hricak H, Stern JL, Fisher MR, Shapeero LG, Winkler ML, Lacey CG (1987) Endometrial carcinoma staging by MR imaging. Radiology 162:297–305
Frei KA, Kinkel K, Bonél HM, Lu Y, Zaloudek C, Hricak H (2000) Prediction of deep myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: clinical utility of contrast-enhanced MR imaging–a meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology 216:444–449
Lee JH, Dubinsky T, Andreotti RF et al (2011) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pretreatment evaluation and follow-up of endometrial cancer of the uterus. Ultrasound Q 27:139–145
Hricak H, Hamm B, Semelka RC et al (1991) Carcinoma of the uterus: use of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging. Radiology 181:95–106
Haldorsen IS, Husby JA, Werner HMJ et al (2012) Standard 1.5-T MRI of endometrial carcinomas: modest agreement between radiologists. Eur Radiol 22:1601–1611
Sala E, Rockall AG, Freeman SJ, Mitchell DG, Reinhold C (2013) The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiology 266:717–740
Wakefield JC, Downey K, Kyriazi S, deSouza NM (2013) New MR techniques in gynecologic cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:249–260
Padhani AR, Miles KA (2010) Multiparametric imaging of tumor response to therapy. Radiology 256:348–364
Patterson DM, Padhani AR, Collins DJ (2008) Technology insight: water diffusion MRI - a potential new biomarker of response to cancer therapy. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 5:220–233
Hellman RN (2011) Gadolinium-induced nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Semin Nephrol 31:310–316
Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L et al (2010) Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Heal Technol Assess Winch Engl 14:1–193
Parekh-Bhurke S, Kwok CS, Pang C, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder JJ et al (2011) Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement. J Clin Epidemiol 64:349–357
Haynes RB, Kastner M, Wilczynski NL, Team H (2005) Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound and relevant causation studies in EMBASE. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak 5:8–14
Leeflang MMG, Scholten RJPM, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PMM (2006) Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol 59:234–240
De Vet HCW, Eisinga A, Riphagen II, Aertgeerts B, Pewsner D (2008) Chapter 7: searching for studies. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 0.4. Cochrane Collaboration. http://srdta.cochrane.org/handbook-dta-reviews. Accessed 20 Oct 2013
Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, Montori VM, de Vet HCW, van der Windt DAWM et al (2002) Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol 2:9–21
Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536
Creasman W (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105:109
Dinnes J, Deeks J, Kirby J, Roderick P (2005) A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Heal Technol Assess 9:1–113
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560
Chu H, Guo H, Zhou Y (2010) Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic studies using generalized linear mixed models. Med Decis Mak 30:499–508
Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L (2005) The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 58:882–893
Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M (2000) Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1119–1129
Bharwani N, Miquel ME, Sahdev A et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of tumour grade in endometrial cancer. Br J Radiol 84:997–1004
Masroor I, Zeeshan M, Afzal S, Ahmad N, Shafqat G (2010) Diffusion weighted MR imaging [DWI] and ADC values in endometrial carcinoma. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 20:709–713
Inada Y, Matsuki M, Nakai G et al (2009) Body diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer: Is it helpful in the detection of cancer in nonenhanced MR imaging? Eur J Radiol 70:122–127
Kisu I, Banno K, Lin LY et al (2013) Preoperative and intraoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and frozen section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92:525–535
Zhang P, Tang Y, Li W, Hui N (2011) Value of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma of early stage. Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao 31:477–480
An Q, Yang J, Zhu Y (2012) Diffusion weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of early stage endometrial cancer. Acta Acad Med Sin 34:486–491
Tamai K, Koyama T, Saga T et al (2007) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:682–687
Shen S-H, Chiou Y-Y, Wang JH et al (2008) Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging with parallel technique in assessment of endometrial cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:481–488
Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial cancer: differentiation from benign endometrial lesions and preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion. Acta Radiol Stockh Swed 50:947–953
Lin G, Ng KK, Chang CJ et al (2009) Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging–initial experience. Radiology 250:784–792
Rechichi G, Galimberti S, Signorelli M, Perego P, Valsecchi MG, Sironi S (2010) Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 1.5-T. Eur Radiol 20:754–762
Beddy P, Moyle P, Kataoka M et al (2012) Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion and overall staging in endometrial cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 262:530–537
Ren C, Xue H, Li S et al (2012) Clinical application of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative evaluation of endometrial cancer. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao 34:455–460
Dogan D, Inan N, Sarisoy HT et al (2013) Preoperative evaluation of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma: diagnostic performance of 3 T MRI. Abdom Imaging 38:388–396
Seo JM, Kim CK, Choi D, Kwan Park B (2013) Endometrial cancer: utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with background body signal suppression at 3 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:1151–1159
Hori M, Kim T, Onishi H et al (2013) Endometrial cancer: preoperative staging using three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T: a prospective comparative study. Eur Radiol 23:2296–2305
Kido A, Fujimoto K, Okada T, Togashi K (2013) Advanced MRI in malignant neoplasms of the uterus. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:249–264
Beddy P, O’Neill AC, Yamamoto AK, Addley HC, Reinhold C, Sala E (2012) FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: added benefits of MR imaging. Radiographics 32:241–254
Whittaker CS, Coady A, Culver L, Rustin G, Padwick M, Padhani AR (2009) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of female pelvic tumors: a pictorial review. Radiographics 29:759–774
Creasman WT, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P et al (2006) Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. FIGO 26th annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95:S105–S143
Merkle EM, Dale BM (2006) Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1524–1532
Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, Yasuda S, Nasu S, Van Cauteren M (2004) Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. Radiat Med 22:275–282
Kilickesmez O, Bayramoglu S, Inci E, Cimilli T, Kayhan A (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and diseased uterine zones. Acta Radiol Stockh Swed 50:340–347
Macaskill P, Gatsonis S, Deeks J, Harbord R, Takwoingi Y (2010) Chapter 10: analysing and presenting results. Cochrane handbook systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 10. Cochrane Collaboration. http://srdta.cochrane.org/handbook-dta-reviews. Accessed 20 Oct 2013
Rechichi G, Galimberti S, Oriani M et al (2013) ADC maps in the prediction of pelvic lymph nodal metastatic regions in endometrial cancer. Eur Radiol 23:65–74
Acknowledgments
We thanks Laura Colombo for her thoughtful help during bibliographic research and Liu Xiaoqiu for her translation from Chinese.
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Maria Grazia Valsecchi. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. Three of the authors have significant statistical expertise. Institutional review board approval was not required because the manuscript is a meta-analysis of already published studies and there are no patient level data. Written informed consent was not required for this study because the manuscript is a meta-analysis and there are no patient level data. Methodology: meta-analysis, performed at one institution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOC 86 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andreano, A., Rechichi, G., Rebora, P. et al. MR diffusion imaging for preoperative staging of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 24, 1327–1338 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3139-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3139-4