Skip to main content
Log in

Density and morphology of coronary artery calcium for the prediction of cardiovascular events: insights from the Framingham Heart Study

  • Cardiac
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the association between directly measured density and morphology of coronary artery calcium (CAC) with cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, using computed tomography (CT).

Methods

Framingham Heart Study (FHS) participants with CAC in noncontrast cardiac CT (2002–2005) were included and followed until 2016. Participants with known CVD or uninterpretable CT scans were excluded. We assessed and correlated (Spearman) CAC density, CAC volume, and the number of calcified segments. Moreover, we counted morphology features including shape (cylindrical, spherical, semi-tubular, and spotty), location (bifurcation, facing pericardium, or facing myocardium), and boundary regularity. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, we associated all CAC characteristics with CVD events (CVD-death, myocardial infarction, stroke).

Results

Among 1330 included participants (57.8 ± 11.7 years; 63% male), 73 (5.5%) experienced CVD events in a median follow-up of 9.1 (7.8–10.1) years. CAC density correlated strongly with CAC volume (Spearman’s ρ = 0.75; p < 0.001) and lower number of calcified segments (ρ = − 0.86; p < 0.001; controlled for CAC volume). In the survival analysis, CAC density was associated with CVD events independent of Framingham risk score (HR (per SD) = 2.09; 95%CI, 1.30–3.34; p = 0.002) but not after adjustment for CAC volume (p = 0.648). The extent of spherically shaped and pericardially sided calcifications was associated with fewer CVD events accounting for the number of calcified segments (HR (per count) = 0.55; 95%CI, 0.31–0.98; p = 0.042 and HR = 0.66; 95%CI, 0.45–0.98; p = 0.039, respectively).

Conclusions

Directly measured CAC density does not predict CVD events due to the strong correlation with CAC volume. The spherical shape and pericardial-sided location of CAC are associated with fewer CVD events and may represent morphological features related to stable coronary plaques.

Key Points

Coronary calcium density may not be independently associated with cardiovascular events.

Coronary calcium density correlates strongly with calcium volume.

Spherical shape and pericardial-sided location of CAC are associated with fewer CVD events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AS:

Agatston score

AUC:

Area under the curve

BMI:

Body mass index

CAC:

Coronary artery calcium

CT:

Computed tomography

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

FHS:

Framingham Heart Study

FRS:

Framingham risk score

HU:

Hounsfield units

ICC:

Intra-class correlation coefficient

IVUS:

Intravascular ultrasound

LAD:

Left anterior descending

LCx:

Left circumflex artery

MESA:

Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

RCA:

Right coronary artery

VIF:

Variance inflation factor

References

  1. Nakahara T, Dweck MR, Narula N et al (2017) Coronary artery calcification: from mechanism to molecular imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:582–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nasir K, Clouse M (2012) Role of nonenhanced multidetector CT coronary artery calcium testing in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Radiology 264:637–649. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12110810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832

  4. Criqui MH, Denenberg JO, Ix JH et al (2014) Calcium density of coronary artery plaque and risk of incident cardiovascular events. JAMA 311:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.282535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Criqui MH, Knox JB, Denenberg JO et al (2017) Coronary artery calcium volume and density. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:845–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shaw LJ, Min JK, Nasir K et al (2018) Sex differences in calcified plaque and long-term cardiovascular mortality: observations from the CAC Consortium. Eur Heart J 39:3727–3735. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JB, Mintz GS, Lisauskas JB et al (2011) Histopathologic validation of the intravascular ultrasound diagnosis of calcified coronary artery nodules. Am J Cardiol 108:1547–1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cardoso L, Kelly-Arnold A, Maldonado N, Laudier D, Weinbaum S (2014) Effect of tissue properties, shape and orientation of microcalcifications on vulnerable cap stability using different hyperelastic constitutive models. J Biomech 47:870–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.01.010

  9. Kataoka Y, Wolski K, Uno K et al (2012) Spotty calcification as a marker of accelerated progression of coronary atherosclerosis: insights from serial intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1592–1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M et al (2007) Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Asakura T, Karino T (1990) Flow patterns and spatial distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in human coronary arteries. Circ Res 66:1045–1066. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.66.4.1045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chatzizisis YS, Jonas M, Coskun AU et al (2008) Prediction of the localization of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the basis of low endothelial shear stress: an intravascular ultrasound and histopathology natural history study. Circulation 117:993–1002. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.695254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffmann U, Massaro JM, Fox CS, Manders E, O'Donnell CJ (2008) Defining normal distributions of coronary artery calcium in women and men (from the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 102:1136–1141.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.06.038

  14. D’Agostino RB Sr, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ et al (2008) General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 117:743–753. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579

  15. Goff DC Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G et al (2014) 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:2935–2959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.005

  16. 3D Slicer. Available via https://www.slicer.org/. Accessed 16 Jun 2017

  17. Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ et al (2008) Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med 358:1336–1345. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa072100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC (2004) Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 291:210–215. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.2.210

  19. Hoffmann U, Massaro JM, D'Agostino RB Sr, Kathiresan S, Fox CS, O'Donnell CJ (2016) Cardiovascular event prediction and risk reclassification by coronary, aortic, and valvular calcification in the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Heart Assoc 5. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.003144

  20. Blaha MJ, Budoff MJ, Tota-Maharaj R et al (2016) Improving the CAC score by addition of regional measures of calcium distribution: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:1407–1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.03.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown ER, Kronmal RA, Bluemke DA et al (2008) Coronary calcium coverage score: determination, correlates, and predictive accuracy in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Radiology 247:669–675. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2473071469

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferencik M, Pencina KM, Liu T et al (2017) Coronary artery calcium distribution is an independent predictor of incident major coronary heart disease events: results from the Framingham Heart Study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 10:e006592. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006592

  23. Bellasi A, Ferramosca E, Ratti C, Block G, Raggi P (2016) The density of calcified plaques and the volume of calcium predict mortality in hemodialysis patients. Atherosclerosis 250:166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.03.034

  24. Mukai H, Dai L, Chen Z et al (2018) Inverse J-shaped relation between coronary arterial calcium density and mortality in advanced chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy352

  25. Stone PH, Saito S, Takahashi S et al (2012) Prediction of progression of coronary artery disease and clinical outcomes using vascular profiling of endothelial shear stress and arterial plaque characteristics: the PREDICTION Study. Circulation 126(2):172–181. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.096438

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study used in part data and resources from the Framingham Heart Study of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health and Boston University School of Medicine. Dr. Borek Foldyna, Dr. Udo Hoffmann, and Dr. Christopher J. O’Donnell have had full access to all the study data and take responsibility for the data integrity and the analysis accuracy.

Our project was presented at the SCCT 2018 in Dallas, TX, USA, and received the Siemens Outstanding Academic Research (SOAR) award.

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Borek Foldyna.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Foldyna received unrelated funding from the German Research Foundation (DFG), project 290004377 (FO993/1) and support from the National Institutes of Health 5K24HL113128-07. Dr. Hoffmann received unrelated Research Grants (U01HL092040, U01HL092022, Heart Flow Inc., MedImmune; KOWA Inc.). Dr. Ferencik reports receiving an unrelated grant from the American Heart Association. This work was further supported by the NIH Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study (contract nos. N01- HC-25195, HL076784, AG028321, HL070100, HL060040, HL080124, HL071039, HL077447, HL107385). The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

Some study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in the scope of prior Framingham Heart Study investigations.

This study used in part data and resources from the Framingham Heart Study of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health and Boston University School of Medicine. Dr. Borek Foldyna, Dr. Udo Hoffmann, and Dr. Christopher J. O’Donnell have had full access to all the study data and take responsibility for the data integrity and the analysis accuracy.

Methodology

• retrospective

• observational

• performed at one institution (study center)

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 8840 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foldyna, B., Eslami, P., Scholtz, JE. et al. Density and morphology of coronary artery calcium for the prediction of cardiovascular events: insights from the Framingham Heart Study. Eur Radiol 29, 6140–6148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06223-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06223-7

Keywords

Navigation