Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Drag and lift reduction of a 3D bluff-body using active vortex generators

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a passive flow control experiment on a 3D bluff-body using vortex generators (VGs) is presented. The bluff-body is a modified Ahmed body (Ahmed in J Fluids Eng 105:429–434 1983) with a curved rear part, instead of a slanted one, so that the location of the flow separation is no longer forced by the geometry. The influence of a line of non-conventional trapezoïdal VGs on the aerodynamic forces (drag and lift) induced on the bluff-body is investigated. The high sensitivity to many geometric (angle between the trapezoïdal element and the wall, spanwise spacing between the VGs, longitudinal location on the curved surface) and physical (freestream velocity) parameters is clearly demonstrated. The maximum drag reduction is −12%, while the maximum global lift reduction can reach more than −60%, with a strong dependency on the freestream velocity. For some configurations, the lift on the rear axle of the model can be inverted (−104%). It is also shown that the VGs are still efficient even downstream of the natural separation line. Finally, a dynamic parameter is chosen and a new set-up with motorized vortex generators is proposed. Thanks to this active device. The optimal configurations depending on two parameters are found more easily, and a significant drag and lift reduction (up to −14% drag reduction) can be reached for different freestream velocities. These results are then analyzed through wall pressure and velocity measurements in the near-wake of the bluff-body with and without control. It appears that the largest drag and lift reduction is clearly associated to a strong increase of the size of the recirculation bubble over the rear slant. Investigation of the velocity field in a cross-section downstream the model reveals that, in the same time, the intensity of the longitudinal trailing vortices is strongly reduced, suggesting that the drag reduction is due to the breakdown of the balance between the separation bubble and the longitudinal vortices. It demonstrates that for low aspect ratio 3D bluff-bodies, like road vehicles, the flow control strategy is much different from the one used on airfoils: an early separation of the boundary layer can lead to a significant drag reduction if the circulation of the trailing vortices is reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed SR (1983) Influence of base slant on the wake structure and drag of road vehicles. J Fluids Eng 105:429–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed SR, Ramm R, Faltin G (1984) Some salient features of the time-averaged ground vehicle wake. SAE Paper pp 1–30, 840300

  • Aider JL, Beaudoin JF (2008) Drag and lift reduction of a 3d bluff-body using flaps. Exp Fluids 44(4):491–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aider J-L, Beaudoin J-F, Wesfreid JE (2009a) Investigation of the flow around bluff-body vortex generators. Application to the control of the drag and lift of a 3d bluff-body. Exp Fluids (In preparation)

  • Aider J-L, Lasserre J-J, Beaudoin J-F, Herbert V, Wesfreid JE (2009b) Contrôle d’écoulement en aérodynamique automobile. In Actes du Congrès Français de Mécanique (CFM’09). Marseille, France

  • Aider JL, Lasserre JJ, Herbert V (2003) Dispositif aerodynamique pour un vehicule automobile - Aerodynamic system for road vehicles. Patent FR 0305923 - EP 04 292001.7. PSA Peugeot-Citroën

  • Andersson P, Brandt L, Bottaro A, Henningson DS (2002) On the breakdown of boundary layer streaks. J Fluid Mech 428:29–60

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Angele K, Grewe F (2002) Streamwise vortices in turbulent boundary layer separation control. In: Proceeding of the 11th symposium on application of laser techniques to fluid mechanics. Lisbon, Portugal

  • Ardonceau P, Amani G (1992) Remarks on the relation between lift induced drag and vortex drag. Eur J Mech B/Fluids 11(4):455–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin JF, Cadot O, Aider JL, Gosse K, Paranthoën P, Hamelin B, Tissier M, Allano D, Mutabazi I, Gonzales M, Wesfreid JE (2004) Cavitation as a complementary tool for automotive aerodynamics. Exp Fluids 37(5):763–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin JF, Cadot O, Aider JL, Wesfreid JE (2006) Drag reduction of a bluff-body using adaptive control methods. Phys Fluids 18(085107):10

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin JF, Cadot O, Aider JL, Wesfreid JE (2008) Drag reduction of a 3d bluff-body by closed loop control using oscillating vortex generators and wall pressure measurement. In: Morrison J, Jonathan F, Birch DM, Lavoie P (eds) Proceedings of the IUTAM symposium on flow control and MEMS, London, United-Kingdom, 2006 IUTAM Bookseries, vol. 7. Springer

  • Betterton JG, Hackett HC, Ashill PR, Wilson MJ, Woodcock IJ, Tilman CP, Langan KJ (2000) Laser doppler anemometry investigation on sub boundary layer vortex generators for flow control. In: Proceeding of the 10th symposium on application of laser techniques to fluid mechanics. Lisbon, Portugal

  • Bewley TR, Moin P, Temam R (2001) DNS-based predictive control of turbulence: an optimal benchmark for feedback algorithms. J Fluid Mech 447:179–225

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chometon F, Laurent J (1990) Study of three dimensional separated flows, relation between induced drag and vortex drag. Eur J Mech B/Fluids 9(5):437–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun S, Lee I, J Sung H (1999) Effect of spanwise-varying local forcing on turbulent separated flow over a backward-facing step. Exp Fluids 26:437–440

  • Dalton C, Xu Y, Owen JC (2001) The suppression of lift on a circular cylinder due to vortex shedding at moderate Reynolds numbers. J Fluids Struc 15:617–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despré C, Colin O, Lasserre J-J, Aider JL (2003) Validation du potentiel de générateurs de vortex actifs pour la réduction de tranée et de portance d’une Citroën C4 berline ou coupée. Technical Reports. PSA Peugeot-Citroën

  • Duriez T, Aider J-L, Wesfreid JE (2006) Base flow modification by streamwise vortices. Application to the control of separated flows. In Control of Separated Flows, ASME technical paper FEDSM2006-98541. Miami, USA

  • Duriez T, Aider J-L, Wesfreid JE (2008) Linear modulation of a boundary layer induced by vortex generators. In: 4th Flow control conference, AIAA technical paper AIAA-2008-4076. Seattle, USA

  • Duriez T, Aider J-L, Wesfreid JE (2009) Experimental evidence of a self-sustaining process through streaks generation in a flat plate boundary layer. Phys Rev Lett to be published

  • Gad-El-Hak M, Bushnell DM (1991) Separation control: review. J Fluids Eng 113:5–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannetti F, Luchini P (2007) Structural sensitivity of the first instability of the cylinder wake. J Fluid Mech 581:167–197

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliéron P, Chometon F (1999) Modelling of stationary three-dimensional separated air flows around an ahmed reference model. ESAIM: Proc 7:173–182

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Godard G, Stanislas M (2006) Control of a decelerating boundary layer. part 1: Optimization of passive vortex generators. Aerosp Sci Technol 10:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golhke M, Beaudoin JF, Amielh M, Anselmet F (2008) Experimental analysis of flow structures and forces on a 3d-bluff-body in constant cross-wind. Exp Fluids 43(4):579–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt D, Wygnanski IJ (2000) The control of flow separation by periodic excitation. Prog Aerosp Sci 36:487–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hucho WH (1998) Aerodynamics of road vehicles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Joslin RD (1998) Aircraft laminar flow control. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J (2003) Control of turbulent boundary layers. Phys Fluids 15(5):1093–1105

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc C, Levalois E, Gilliéron P, Kourta A (2006) Aerodynamic drag reduction by synthetic jet: 2D numerical study around simplified car. In 3rd AIAA flow control conference, 5–8 June 2006, San Francisco, CA, USA. AIAA Paper 2006-3337

  • Lin C, Chiu PH, Shieh SJ (2002) Characteristics of horseshoe vortex system near a vertical plate-base juncture. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 27:25–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin J (2002) Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation. Prog Aerosp Sci 38:389–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onorato M, Costelli AF, Garrone A (1984) Drag measurement through wake analysis. SAE Paper pp 85–93, 840302

  • Raffel M, Willert C, Wereley S, Kompenhans J (2007) Particle image velocimetry. A practical guide. Second Edition. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Roumeas M, Gillieron P, Kourta A (2009) Analysis and control of the near-wake flow over a square-back geometry. Comput Fluids 38(1):60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson RL (2001) Junction flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 33:415–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith FT (1994) Theoretical prediction and design for vortex generators in turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 270:91–131

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Song S, Eaton JK (2002) The effects of wall roughness on the separated flow over a smoothly contoured ramp. Exp Fluids 33:38–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn A, Gilliéron P (2002) Flow separations generated by a simplified geometry of an automotive vehicle. In: Proceeding of the IUTAM symposium on unsteady separated flows. Toulouse, France

  • Strykowski PJ, Sreenivasan KR (1990) On the formation and suppression of vortex shedding at low reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 218:71–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verzicco R, Fatica M, Iaccarino G, Moin P, Khalighi B (2002) Large eddy simulation of a road vehicle with drag-reduction devices. AIAA J 40(12):2447–2455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vino G, Watkins S, Mousley P, Watmuff J, Prasad S (2005) Flow structures in the near-wake of the ahmed model. J Fluids Struc 20(5):673–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank G. Hulin, A. Lebau for their contribution to the wind tunnel measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. PSA Peugeot-Citroën, Research and Innovation Department, route de Gisy, 78943, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France

    Jean-Luc Aider & Jean-François Beaudoin

  2. Laboratoire PMMH, UMR 7636, CNRS, ESPCI, University Paris 6, University Paris 7-10, rue Vauquelin, 75231, Paris cedex 05, France

    Jean-Luc Aider, Jean-François Beaudoin & José Eduardo Wesfreid

Authors
  1. Jean-Luc Aider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean-François Beaudoin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José Eduardo Wesfreid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Luc Aider.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aider, JL., Beaudoin, JF. & Wesfreid, J.E. Drag and lift reduction of a 3D bluff-body using active vortex generators. Exp Fluids 48, 771–789 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0770-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0770-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation