Abstract
This paper reports experimental results on using steady and unsteady plasma aerodynamic actuation to control the corner separation, which forms over the suction surface and end wall corner of a compressor cascade blade passage. Total pressure recovery coefficient distribution was adopted to evaluate the corner separation. Corner separation causes significant total pressure loss even when the angle of attack is 0°. Both steady and unsteady plasma aerodynamic actuations suppress the corner separation effectively. The control effect obtained by the electrode pair at 25% chord length is as effective as that obtained by all four electrode pairs. Increasing the applied voltage improves the control effect while it augments the power requirement. Increasing the Reynolds number or the angle of attack makes the corner separation more difficult to control. The unsteady actuation is much more effective and requires less power due to the coupling between the unsteady actuation and the separated flow. Duty cycle and excitation frequency are key parameters in unsteady plasma flow control. There are thresholds in both the duty cycle and the excitation frequency, above which the control effect saturates. The maximum relative reduction in total pressure loss coefficient achieved is up to 28% at 70% blade span. The obvious difference between steady and unsteady actuation may be that wall jet governs the flow control effect of steady actuation, while much more vortex induced by unsteady actuation is the reason for better control effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- c :
-
Chord length
- t :
-
Blade spacing
- h :
-
Blade height
- β 1 :
-
Inlet-air angle
- β 2 :
-
Outlet-air angle
- β s :
-
Blade stagger angle
- i :
-
Angle of attack
- ν ∞ :
-
Freestream velocity
- R e :
-
Reynolds number based on the axial chord length and the freestream velocity
- T 1 :
-
Static temperature at the cascade inlet
- P 1 :
-
Static pressure at the cascade inlet
- P *1 :
-
Total pressure at the cascade inlet
- P 2 :
-
Static pressure at the cascade outlet
- P *2 :
-
Total pressure at the cascade outlet
- σ :
-
Total pressure recovery coefficient
- ω :
-
Total pressure loss coefficient
- ω baseline :
-
Total pressure loss coefficient without actuation
- ω actuated :
-
Total pressure loss coefficient with actuation
- δ(ω):
-
Relative reduction in the total pressure loss coefficient
- δ(ω)max:
-
Relative reduction in the maximum total pressure loss coefficient
- d 1 :
-
Upper electrode width
- d 2 :
-
Lower electrode width
- Δd :
-
Inner space of an electrode pair
- h e :
-
Electrode height
- h d :
-
Dielectric layer height
- D :
-
Space between adjacent electrode pairs
- T ac :
-
Period of the steady plasma aerodynamic actuation
- F :
-
Driving frequency of the high voltage sine wave
- T signal :
-
Period of the unsteady plasma aerodynamic actuation on duty
- T control :
-
Period of the unsteady plasma aerodynamic actuation
- f :
-
Excitation frequency of the unsteady plasma aerodynamic actuation
- α :
-
Duty cycle of the unsteady plasma aerodynamic actuation
- C :
-
Characteristic length of the axial separation region at the endwall
- S r :
-
Strouhal number based on the characteristic length and the local freestream velocity
References
Benard N, Braud P, Jolibois J, Moreau E (2008) Airflow reattachment along a NACA 0015 airfoil by surfaces dielectric barrier discharge actuator—time resolved particle image velocimetry investigation. In: AIAA paper 2008-4202. 4th Flow control conference. Seattle
Benard N, Jolibois J, Moreau E (2009) Lift and drag performances of an axisymmetric airfoil controlled by plasma actuator. J Electrostat 67:133–139
Boeuf JP, Lagmich Y, Unfer T, Callegari T, Pitchford LC (2007) Electrohydrodynamic force in dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators. J Phys D Appl Phys 40:652–662
Borcia G, Anderson C, Brown N (2003) Dielectric barrier discharge for surface treatment: application to selected polymers in film and fibre form. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 12:335–344
Corke TC, Mertz B, Patel MP (2006) Plasma flow control optimized airfoil. In: AIAA Paper 2006-1208. 44th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reno
Corke TC, Post ML, Orlov DM (2007) SDBD plasma enhanced aerodynamics: concepts, optimization and applications. Prog Aerosp Sci 43:193–217
Dong Y, Gallimore SJ, Hodson HP (1987) Three-dimensional flows and loss reduction in axial compressors. ASME J Turbomach 109(3):354–361
Falkenstein Z, Coogan J (1997) Microdischarge behaviour in the silent discharge of nitrogen oxygen and water air mixtures. Appl Phys 30:817–825
Forte M, Jolibois J, Pons J, Moreau E, Touchard G, Cazalens M (2007) Optimization of a dielectric barrier discharge actuator by stationary and non-stationary measurements of the induced flow velocity: application to airflow control. Exp Fluids 42:917–928
Gbadebo SA (2003) Three-dimensional separations in compressors. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge
Gbadebo SA, Cumpsty NA, Hynes TP (2005) Three-dimensional separations in axial compressors. ASME J Turbomach 127(2):331–339
Gbadebo SA, Cumpsty NA, Hynes TP (2008) Control of three-dimensional separations in axial compressors by tailored boundary layer suction. ASME J Turbomach 130(1):011004
Greenblatt D, Wygnanski I (2000) The control of separation by period excitation. Prog Aerosp Sci 36:487–545
Grundmann S, Tropea C (2007) Experimental transition delay using glow-discharge plasma actuators. Exp Fluids 42:653–657
Hergt A, Meyer R, Engel K (2006) Experimental investigation of flow control in compressor cascades. In: ASME Paper GT2006-90415. ASME Turbo Expo 2006: Power for land, sea and air. Barcelona
Huang J, Corke TC, Thomas FO (2006a) Plasma actuators for separation control of low-pressure turbine blades. AIAA J 44(1):51–57
Huang J, Corke TC, Thomas FO (2006b) Unsteady plasma actuators for separation control of low-pressure turbine blades. AIAA J 44(7):1477–1487
Jolibois J, Forte M, Moreau E (2008) Application of an AC barrier discharge actuator to control airflow separation above a NACA 0015 airfoil: optimization of the actuation location along the chord. J Electrostat 66:496–503
Moreau E (2007) Airflow control by non-thermal plasma actuators. J Phys D Appl Phys 40:605–636
Nersisyan G, Graham W (2004) Characterization of a dielectric barrier discharge operating in an open reactor with flowing helium. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 13:582–587
Place JMM (1997) Three-dimensional flow in axial compressors. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge
Roth JR, Sherman DM (2000) Electrohydrodynamic flow control with a glow-discharge surface plasma. AIAA J 38(7):1166–1172
Samimy M, Kim J, Kastner J, Adamovich I, Utkin Y (2007) Active control of high-speed and high Reynolds number jets using plasma actuators. J Fluid Mech 578:305–330
Sung Y, Kim W, Mungal MG, Cappelli MA (2006) Aerodynamic modification of flow over bluff objects by plasma actuation. Exp Fluids 41:479–486
Wu Y, Li YH, Zhu JQ, Su CB, Liang H, Li G (2007) Experimental investigation of a subsonic compressor with plasma actuation treated casing. In: AIAA paper 2007-3849. 37th AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit. Miami
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Min JIA and Cheng-qin LI for the help in the experiment. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (50906100), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (20090450373).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Yh., Wu, Y., Zhou, M. et al. Control of the corner separation in a compressor cascade by steady and unsteady plasma aerodynamic actuation. Exp Fluids 48, 1015–1023 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0787-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0787-2