Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental study of flow separation control on a low-Re airfoil using leading-edge protuberance method

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experimental study of flow separation control on a low-Re c airfoil was presently investigated using a newly developed leading-edge protuberance method, motivated by the improvement in the hydrodynamics of the giant humpback whale through its pectoral flippers. Deploying this method, the control effectiveness of the airfoil aerodynamics was fully evaluated using a three-component force balance, leading to an effectively impaired stall phenomenon and great improvement in the performances within the wide post-stall angle range (22°–80°). To understand the flow physics behind, the vorticity field, velocity field and boundary layer flow field over the airfoil suction side were examined using a particle image velocimetry and an oil-flow surface visualization system. It was found that the leading-edge protuberance method, more like low-profile vortex generator, effectively modified the flow pattern of the airfoil boundary layer through the chordwise and spanwise evolutions of the interacting streamwise vortices generated by protuberances, where the separation of the turbulent boundary layer dominated within the stall region and the rather strong attachment of the laminar boundary layer still existed within the post-stall region. The characteristics to manipulate the flow separation mode of the original airfoil indicated the possibility to further optimize the control performance by reasonably designing the layout of the protuberances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brain C, Donald C (1983) An experimental study of entrainment and transport in the turbulent near wake of a circular cylinder. J Fluid Mech 136:321–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman H, Steele W (1989) Experimentation and uncertainty analysis for engineers. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Custodio D (2007) The effect of humpback whale-like leading edge protuberances on hydrofoil performance. Master Dissertation, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  • Devinant P, Laverne T, Hureau J (2002) Experimental study of wind-turbine airfoil aerodynamics in high turbulence. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 90:689–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovgal AV, Kozlov VV, Michalke A (1994) Laminar boundary layer separation: instability and associated phenomena. Prog Aerospace Sci 30:61–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dropkin A, Custodio D, Henoch CW, Johari H (2012) Computation of flowfield around an airfoil with leading-edge protuberances. J Aircraft 49(5):1345–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favier J, Pinelli A, Piomelli U (2012) Control of the separated flow around an airfoil using a wavy leading edge inspired by humpback whale flippers. C R Mecanique 340:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish FE, Battle JM (1995) Hydrodynamic design of the humpback whale flipper. J Morphol 225:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish FE, Lauder GV (2006) Passive and active flow control by swimming fishes and mammals. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 38:193–224

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fish FE, Weber PW, Murray MM, Laurens EH (2011) The tubercles on humpback whales’ flippers: application of bio-inspired technology. Integr Comp Biol 51(1):203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouras A, Soria J (1998) Accuracy of out-of-plane vorticity measurements derived from in-plane velocity field data. Exp Fluids 25:409–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulf DE (1957) A correlation of low-speed, airfoil-section stalling characteristics with Reynolds number and airfoil geometry. NACA TN3963

  • Hackett JE, Cooper KR (2001) Extensions to the Maskell’s theory for blockage effects on bluff bodies in a closed wind tunnel. Aeronaut J 105:409–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen KL, Kelso RM, Dally BB (2011) Performance variations of leading-edge tubercles for distinct airfoil profiles. AIAA J 49(1):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang RF, Mao SW (2002) Separation control on a cantilever wing with a self-excited vibrating rod. J Aircraft 39(4):609–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johari H, Henoch C, Custodio D, Levshin A (2007) Effects of leading-edge protuberances on airfoil performance. AIAA J 45(11):2634–2642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levshin A, Custodio D, Henoch C, Johari H (2006) Effects of leading edge protuberances on airfoil performance. In: Proceeding of 36th AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, San Francisco, California, AIAA 2006–2868

  • Lin JC (2002) Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation. Prog Aerosp Sci 38:389–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JC, Pauley LL (1996) Low-Reynolds-number separation on an airfoil. AIAA J 34:1570–1577

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YF, Lam K, Zhou L, Liu Y (2013) Numerical study of flows past airfoils with wavy surfaces. J Fluid Struct 36:136–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lissaman PBS (1983) Low-reynolds-number airfoils. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 15:223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskell EG (1963) Theory of blockage effects on bluff bodies and stalled wings in a closed wind tunnel. ARC R&M 3400

  • McCullough GB, Gault DE (1951) Examples of three representative types of airfoil-section stall at low speed. NACA TN2502

  • Miklosovic DS, Murray MM, Howle LE, Fish FE (2004) Leading-deg tubercles delay stall on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) flippers. Phys Fluids 16(5):39–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklosovic DS, Murray MM, Howle LE (2007) Experimental evaluation of sinusoidal leading edges. J Aircraft 44(4):1404–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller TJ, DeLaurier JD (2003) Aerodynamics of small vehicles. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35:89–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedro HTC, Kobayashi MH (2008) Numerical study of stall delay on humpback whale flippers. In: Proceeding of 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada

  • Raghunathan S, Harrison JR, Hawkins BD (1988) Thick airfoil at low Reynolds number and high incidence. J Aircraft 25:669–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanway MJ (2008) Hydrodynamic effect of leading-edge tubercles on control surfaces and in flapping foil propulsion. Master Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Timmins BH, Wilson BW, Smith BL, Vlachos PP (2012) A method for automatic estimation of instantaneous local uncertainty in particle image velocimetry measurements. Exp Fluids 53:1133–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torenbeek E (1982) Synthesis of subsonic airplane design. Delft University Press, The Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Nierop EA, Alben S, Brenner MP (2008) How bumps on whale flippers delay stall: an aerodynamic model. Phys Rev Lett 100:054502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts P, Fish FE (2001) The influence of passive, leading edge tubercles on wing performance. In: Proceeding of 12th Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology (UUST01), Autonomous Undersea Systems Inst., Durham, NH

  • Weber PW, Howle LE, Murray MM, Miklosovic DS (2011) Computational evaluation of the performance of lifting surfaces with leading-edge protuberances. J Aircraft 48(2):591–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West GS, Apelt CJ (1982) The effect of tunnel blockage and aspect ratio on the mean flow past a circular cylinder with Reynolds number between 104 and 2.5 × 105. J Fluid Mech 114:361–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson BM, Smith BL (2013) Taylor-series and Monte-Carlo-method uncertainty estimation of the width of a probability distribution based on varying bias and random error. Meas Sci Technol 24:035301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright AK, Wood DH (2004) The starting and low wind speed behavior of a small horizontal axis wind turbine. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 92:1265–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MM, Wang GF, Xu JZ (2013) Aerodynamic control of low-Reynolds-number airfoil with leading-edge protuberances. AIAA J 51(8):1960–1971

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51222606) and the “Hundred Talent Program” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 11 Beisihuanxi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100190, China

    M. M. Zhang, G. F. Wang & J. Z. Xu

Authors
  1. M. M. Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. F. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Z. Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. M. Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, M.M., Wang, G.F. & Xu, J.Z. Experimental study of flow separation control on a low-Re airfoil using leading-edge protuberance method. Exp Fluids 55, 1710 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1710-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1710-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation