Abstract
Dynamics of flow control comprised of arrays of active (synthetic jets) and passive (vanes) control elements , and its effectiveness for suppression of total-pressure distortion is investigated experimentally in an offset diffuser, in the absence of internal flow separation. The experiments are conducted in a wind tunnel inlet model at speeds up to M = 0.55 using approach flow conditioning that mimics boundary layer ingestion on a Blended-Wing-Body platform. Time-dependent distortion of the dynamic total-pressure field at the ‘engine face’ is measured using an array of forty total-pressure probes, and the control-induced distortion changes are analyzed using triple decomposition and proper orthogonal decomposition (POD). These data indicate that an array of the flow control small-scale synthetic jet vortices merge into two large-scale, counter-rotating streamwise vortices that exert significant changes in the flow distortion. The two most energetic POD modes appear to govern the distortion dynamics in either active or hybrid flow control approaches. Finally, it is shown that the present control approach is sufficiently robust to reduce distortion with different inlet conditions of the baseline flow.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- a i :
-
Time coefficient of the ith POD mode
- AIP:
-
Aerodynamic interface plane
- BL:
-
Boundary layer
- BLI:
-
Boundary layer ingesting
- BWB:
-
Blended wing body
- D AIP :
-
Duct diameter at the AIP
- DPCP:
-
Face-averaged SAE circumferential distortion descriptor
- DPCPavg :
-
Time-averaged DPCP
- H :
-
Diffuser inlet height
- M :
-
Mach number
- p 0 :
-
Total-pressure
- p T0 :
-
Total-pressure upstream from the diffuser inlet
- POD:
-
Proper orthogonal decomposition
- t :
-
Time
- Τ :
-
Actuation period
- ϕ i :
-
ith POD mode (basis)
- x m :
-
Time-averaged x
- <x>:
-
Phase-averaged x
- <x>′:
-
Coherent fluctuation of x
- x′:
-
Incoherent fluctuation of x
References
Amitay M, Pitt D, Glezer A (2002) Separation control in duct flows. J Aircraft 39(4):616–620
Anabtawi AJ, Blackwelder RF, Liebeck RH, and Lissaman PBS (1999) An experimental study of the effect of offset on thick boundary layers flowing inside diffusing ducts. AIAA Paper 99-3590
Anabtawi AJ, Blackwelder RF, Lissaman PBS, and Liebeck RH (1999) An experimental investigation of boundary layer ingestion in a diffusing S-Duct with and without passive flow control, AIAA Paper 99-0739
Anderson BH, Gibb J (1993) Study on vortex generator flow control for the management of inlet distortion. J Prop Power 9(3):422–430
Anderson BH, Miller DN, Addington GA, Agrell J (2004) Optimal micro-vane flow control for compact air vehicle inlets, NASA/TM. 2004-212936
Anderson BH, Miller DN, Addington GA, Agrell J (2004) Optimal micro-jet flow control for compact air vehicle inlets, NASA/TM. 2004-212937
Anderson BH, Mace JL, and Mani M (2009) Active “fail safe” micro-array flow control for advanced embedded propulsion systems, AIAA Paper 2009-741
Bansod P, Bradshaw P (1972) The flow in s-shaped ducts. Aeronaut Quart 23:131–140
Berkooz G, Holmes P, Lumley JL (1993) The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 25:539–575
Berrier BL, Allan BG (2004) Experimental and computational evaluation of flush-mounted, S-Duct Inlets,” AIAA Paper 2004-764
Bruce EP (1974) Design and evaluation of screens to produce multi-cycle ±20 % amplitude sinusoidal velocity profiles, AIAA Paper 74-623
Chiekh MB, Béra J-C, Sunyach M (2003) Synthetic jet control for flows in a diffuser: vectoring, spreading and mixing enhancement. J Turbulence 4:032
Crittenden T, Glezer A (2006) A high-speed compressible synthetic jet. Phys Fluids 18(1):017107
Dagget DL, Kawai R, and Friedman D (2003) Blended wing body systems studies: boundary layer ingestion inlets with active flow control, NASA CR212670
Gerlach CR and Schroeder EC (1969) Study of minimum pressure loss in high velocity duct systems, NASA CR-102499
Gissen AN, Vukasinovic B, and Glezer A (2009) Controlled streamwise vorticity in diffuser boundary layer using hybrid synthetic jet actuation, AIAA Paper 2009-4021
Gissen AN, Vukasinovic B, McMillan ML, Glezer A (2014) Distortion management in a boundary layer ingestion inlet diffuser using hybrid flow control. J Prop Power 30:834–844
Glezer A, Amitay M (2002) Synthetic jets. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 34:503–529
Godard G, Stanislas M (2006) Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 1: optimization of passive vortex generators. Aerosp Sci Technol 10:181–191
Harrison NA, Anderson J, Fleming JL, Ng WF (2013) Active flow control of a boundary layer-ingesting serpentine inlet diffuser. J Aircraft 50(1):262–271
Jirásek A (2006) Development and application of design strategy for design of vortex generator flow control in inlets, AIAA Paper 2006-1050
Kaldschmidt G, Syltebo BE, and Ting CT (1974) 727 airplane center duct inlet low-speed performance confirmation model test for refanned JT8D Engines Phase II. NASA CR-134534
Kawai RT, Friedman DM, and Serrano L (2006) Blended wing body (BWB) boundary layer ingestion (BLI) inlet configuration and system studies, NASA CR-214534
Kurzke J (2008) Effects of inlet flow distortion on the performance of aircraft gas turbines. J Eng Gas Turb Power 130:041201
Liebeck RH (2004) Design of the blended wing body subsonic transport. J Aircraft 41(1):10–25
Lin JC (2002) Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation. Prog Aerosp Sci 38(4–5):389–420
Owens LR, Allan BG, Gorton SA (2008) Boundary-layer-ingesting inlet flow control. J Aircraft 45(4):1431–1440
Reichert BA, Wendt BJ (1996) Improving curved subsonic diffuser performance with vortex generators. AIAA J 34(1):65–72
Scribben AR, Ng W, Burdisso R (2006) Effectiveness of a serpentine inlet duct flow control technique at design and off-design simulated flight conditions. J Turbomach 128(2):332–339
Smith LH (1993) Wake ingestion propulsion benefit. J Propul Power 9(1):74–82
Society of Automotive Engineers Aerospace Recommended Practice 1420 Revision B, 2002-03-01
Törnblom O, Johansson AV (2007) A Reynolds stress closure description of separation control with vortex generators in a plane asymmetric diffuser. Phys Fluids 19(11):115108
Tournier SE, Paduano JD, and Pagan D (2005) Flow analysis and control in a Transonic Inlet, AIAA Paper 2005-4734
Vaccaro JC, Sahni O, Olles J, Jansen KE, Amitay M (2009) Experimental and numerical investigation of active control of inlet ducts. Int J Flow Control 1(2):133–154
Vakili A, Wu JM, Liver P, and Bhat MK (1983) Measurements of compressible secondary flow in a circular S-duct., AIAA Paper 83-1739
Vakili AD, Wu JM, Liver P, and Bhat MK (1985) Flow control in a diffusing s-duct. AIAA Paper 85-0524
Weigl HJ, Bright MM, Strazisar AJ, Paduano JD, Fréchette LG, Epstein AH, Greitzer EM (1998) Active stabilization of rotating stall and surge in a transonic single stage axial compressor. J Turbomach 120(4):625–636
Wellborn SR, Reichert BA and Okiishi TH (1992) An experimental investigation of the flow in a diffusing S-Duct. AIAA Paper 92-3622
Woo GTK, Crittenden T, and Glezer A (2009) Transitory separation control over a stalled airfoil, AIAA Paper 2009–4281
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the Fundamental Aeronautics Program at the NASA Glenn Research Center under the direction of the Contract Officer’s Technical Representative, Ms. Julianne Dudek. The authors would also like to acknowledge numerous discussions with James Mace, Scott Mackie, and Michelle McMillan, and technical assistance from Michael Ferris and Paul Crnic of the Boeing Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gissen, A.N., Vukasinovic, B. & Glezer, A. Dynamics of flow control in an emulated boundary layer-ingesting offset diffuser. Exp Fluids 55, 1794 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1794-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1794-5