Abstract
The use of porous materials is one of several approaches to passively control or minimize the generation of flow noise. In order to investigate the possible reduction of noise from struts and other protruding parts (for example components of the landing gear or pantographs), acoustic measurements were taken in a small aeroacoustic wind tunnel on a set of circular cylinders with a soft porous cover. The aim of this study was to identify those materials that result in the best noise reduction, which refers to both tonal noise and broadband noise. The porous covers were characterized by their air flow resistivity, a parameter describing the permeability of an open-porous material. The results show that materials with low air flow resistivities lead to a noticeable flow noise reduction. Thereby, the main effect of the porous cylinder covers is that the spectral peak of the aeolian tone due to vortex shedding appears much narrower, but is not suppressed completely. Based on the measurement results, a basic model for the estimation of the total peak level of the aeolian tone was derived. In addition to the minimization of the vortex shedding noise, a reduction of broadband noise can be observed, especially at higher Reynolds numbers. The noise reduction increases with decreasing air flow resistivity of the porous covers, which means that materials that are highly permeable to air result in the best noise reduction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In order to simplify the present case, it was assumed that the porous cylinders lead to the same blockage as a non-porous cylinder.
Sometimes the tortuosity \(\tau\) is defined as the squared ratio of the effective length of the flow path through the pores to the minimum length between flow inlet and outlet.
A similar parameter is known for the non-dimensional description of the lining of absorptive mufflers, where instead of a diameter the thickness of the lining is used (Mechel 2008).
References
Akishita S, Yahathugoda I (2005) Effect of surface impedance for reducing aerodynamic sound from circular cylinder. In: 11th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, AIAA-Paper 2005–2914
Barlow JB, Rae WH, Pope A (1999) Low-speed wind tunnel testing, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Bendat JS, Piersol AG (2000) Random data: analysis and measurement procedures, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Blake WK (1986) Dipole Sound from Cylinders. In: Mechanics of flow-induced sound and vibration volume 1: general concepts and elementary sources. Academic Press Inc, London
Brown K, Devenport W, Borgoltz A (2014) Exploiting the characteristics of kevlar-wall wind tunnels for conventional aerodynamic measurements. In: 30th AIAA aerodynamic measurement technology and ground testing conference, AIAA-Paper 2014–2110
Buresti G (1981) The effect of surface roughness on the flow regime around circular cylinders. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 8(1):105–114
Devenport WJ, Burdisso RA, Borgoltz A, Ravetta PA, Barone MF, Brown KA, Morton MA (2013) The kevlar-walled anechoic wind tunnel. J Sound Vib 332(17):3971–3991
Etkin B, Korbacher GK, Keefe RT (1957) Acoustic radiation from a stationary cylinder in a fluid stream (Aeolian tones). J Acoust Soc Am 29(1):30–36
Gerhard T, Carolus T (2014) Reduction of airfoil trailing edge noise by trailing edge blowing. J Phys Conf Ser 524(1), IOP Publishing
Geyer TF, Sarradj E, Fritzsche C (2010) Measurement of the noise generation at the trailing edge of porous airfoils. Exp Fluids 48:291–308
Hersh AS (1983) Experimental investigation of surface roughness generated flow noise. In: 8th AIAA aeroacoustics conference, AIAA-Paper 83–0786
Howe MS (1984) On the generation of sound by turbulent boundary layer flow over a rough wall. Proc R Soc LondA 395:247–263
Hutcheson FV, Brooks TF, Stead DJ (2012) Measurement of the noise resulting from the interaction of turbulence with a lifting surface. Int J Aeroacoust 11(5):675–700
Hutcheson FV, Brooks TF (2012) Noise radiation from single and multiple rod configurations. Int J Aeroacoust 11(3):291–334
ISO 9053 (1993) Acoustics—materials for acoustical applications—determination of airflow resistance. International Organization for Standardization
Ito T, Ura H, Nakakita K, Yokokawa Y, Ng W, Burdisso R, Yamamoto K (2010) Aerodynamic/aeroacoustic testing in anechoic closed test sections of low-speed wind tunnels. In: 16th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, AIAA-Paper 2010–3750
Keefe RT (1962) Investigation of the fluctuating forces acting on a stationary circular cylinder in a subsonic stream and of the associated sound field. J Acoust Soc Am 34(11):1711–1714
Liu H, Wei J, Qu Z (2012) Prediction of aerodynamic noise reduction by using open-cell metal foam. J Sound Vib 331(7):1483–1497
Liu H, Azarpeyvand M, Wei J, Qu Z (2015) Tandem cylinder aerodynamic sound control using porous coating. J Sound Vib 334:190–201
Mechel FP (2008) Formulas of acoustics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Moreau DJ, Doolan CJ (2013) Flow-induced sound of wall-mounted finite length cylinders. AIAA J 51(10):2493–2502
Naito H, Fukagata K (2012) Numerical simulation of flow around a circular cylinder having porous surface. Phys Fluids 24(11):117102
Niemann HJ, Hölscher N (1990) A review of recent experiments on the flow past circular cylinders. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 33(1):197–209
Nishimura M, Kudo T, Nishioka M (1999) Aerodynamic noise reducing techniques by using pile-fabrics. In: 5th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, AIAA-Paper 99–1847
Noymer PD, Glicksman LR, Devendran A (1998) Drag on a permeable cylinder in steady flow at moderate Reynolds numbers. Chem Eng Sci 53(16):2859–2869
Porteous R, Moreau DJ, Doolan CJ (2014) A review of flow-induced noise from finite wall-mounted cylinders. J Fluids Struct 51:240–254
Sarradj E, Fritzsche C, Geyer TF, Giesler J (2009) Acoustic and aerodynamic design and characterization of a small-scale aeroacoustic wind tunnel. Appl Acoust 70:1073–1080
Sarradj E, Geyer TF (2014) Symbolic regression modeling of noise generation at porous airfoils. J Sound Vib 333(14):3189–3202
Schlichting H, Gersten K (1997) Boundary-layer theory, 9th edn. Springer, Berlin
Schlinker RH, Fink MR, Amiet RK (1976) Vortex noise from nonrotating cylinders and airfoils. In: 14th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA-Paper 76–81
Schmidt M, Lipson H (2009) Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data. Science 324(5923):81–85
Sueki T, Ikeda M, Takaishi T (2009) Aerodynamic noise reduction using porous materials and their application to high-speed pantographs. Quart Rep RTRI 50(1):26–31
Sueki T, Takaishi T, Ikeda M, Arai N (2010) Application of porous material to reduce aerodynamic sound from bluff bodies. Fluid Dyn Res 42(1):015004
Suzuki M, Sueki T, Takaishi T, Nakade K (2009) A numerical study on mechanism of aerodynamic noise reduction by porous material. In: The sixteenth international congress on sound and vibration, ICSV 16, Kraków, Poland
Torquato S, Truskett T, Debenedetti P (2000) Is random close packing of spheres well defined? Phys Rev Lett 84:2064–2067
Yahathugoda I, Akishita S (2005) Experimental investigation on surface impedance effect of sound radiation from low Mach number flow around a circular cylinder. JSME Int J Ser B 48(2):342–349
Zdravkovich MM (1997) Flow around circular cylinders, vol. 1: fundamentals. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Zdravkovich MM (2003) Flow around circular cylinders: vol. 2: applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Martin Noack for his help with the preparation of the cylinders and the measurements.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geyer, T.F., Sarradj, E. Circular cylinders with soft porous cover for flow noise reduction. Exp Fluids 57, 30 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-016-2119-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-016-2119-7