Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of posterior fossa decompression with or without duraplasty in children with Type I Chiari malformation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Chiari malformation type I (CM1) is a common and often debilitating neurosurgical disease. Whether to treat CM1 patients with a traditional posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD) or a less invasive extradural decompression (PFDO) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcome and syrinx resolution between the two procedures.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 36 patients treated with PFDD and 29 patients with PFDO between 2003 and 2011. We compared baseline demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics. The primary clinical outcome was the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS). The primary radiographic outcome was qualitative syrinx improvement or resolution.

Results

At baseline, age and sex distributions, radiographic characteristics, and presenting symptoms were similar in patients undergoing PFDD and PFDO. Patients undergoing PFDO had shorter surgical time (1.5 vs. 2.8 h; p < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (2.1 days compared to 3.3 days; p < 0.001). Cerebrospinal fluid-related complications were more common in patients receiving PFDD (7/36) than PFDO (0/29) (p = 0.014). Clinical improvement, defined by the mean CCOS score, was comparable in patients receiving PFDO (14.7) and PFDD (14.6) (p = 0.70). Among patients with postoperative syrinx imaging, 10/13 in the PFDD group improved or resolved, compared to 8/8 in the PFDO group (p = 0.26).

Conclusions

Extradural decompression for CM1 produces comparable rates of clinical and radiographic improvement as the more invasive decompression with duraplasty. Given the increased morbidity and resource utilization associated with PFDD, PFDO should be considered an attractive first-line option for most CM1 patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aboulezz AO, Sartor K, Geyer CA, Gado MH (1985) Position of cerebellar tonsils in the normal population and in patients with Chiari malformation: a quantitative approach with MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9:1033–1036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Strahle J, Muraszko KM, Kapurch J, Bapuraj JR, Garton HJ, Maher CO (2011) Chiari malformation type I and syrinx in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aitken LA, Lindan CE, Sidney S, Gupta N, Barkovich AJ, Sorel M, Wu YW (2009) Chiari type I malformation in a pediatric population. Pediatr Neurol 40:449–454

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Milhorat TH, Chou MW, Trinidad EM, Kula RW, Mandell M, Wolpert C, Speer MC (1999) Chiari I malformation redefined: clinical and radiographic findings for 364 symptomatic patients. Neurosurgery 44:1005–1017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Massimi L, Novegno F, di Rocco C (2011) Chiari type I malformation in children. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 37:143–211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Durham SR, Fjeld-Olenec K (2008) Comparison of posterior fossa decompression with and without duraplasty for the surgical treatment of Chiari malformation type I in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:42–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Caldarelli M, Novegno F, Vassimi L, Romani R, Tamburrini G, Di Rocco C (2007) The role of limited posterior fossa craniectomy in the surgical treatment of Chiari malformation type I: experience with a pediatric series. J Neurosurg 106:187–195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Limonadi FM, Selden NR (2004) Dura-splitting decompression of the craniocervical junction: reduced operative time, hospital stay, and cost with equivalent early outcome. J Neurosurg 101:184–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hankinson T, Tubbs RS, Wellons JC (2010) Duraplasty or not? An evidence-based review of the pediatric Chiari I malformation. Childs Nerv Syst 27:35–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alzate JC, Kothbauer KF, Jallo GI, Epstein FJ (2001) Treatment of Chiari I malformation in patients with and without syringomyelia: a consecutive series of 66 cases. Neurosurg Focus 11:E3

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Galarza M, Sood S, Ham S (2007) Relevance of surgical strategies for the management of pediatric Chiari type I malformation. Childs Nerv Syst 23:691–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park JK, Gleason PL, Madsen JR, Goumnerova LC, Scott RM (1997) Presentation and management of Chiari I malformation in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 26:190–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Navarro R, Olavarria G, Seshadri R, Gonzales-Portillo G, McLone DG, Tomita T (2004) Surgical results of posterior fossa decompression for patients with Chiari I malformation. Childs Nerv Syst 20:349–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Erdogan E, Cansever T, Secer HI, Temiz C, Sirin S, Kabatas S, Gonul E (2010) The evaluation of surgical treatment options in the Chiari malformation type I. Turk Neurosurg 20:303–313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Munshi I, Frim D, Stine-Reyes R, Weir BK, Hekmatpanah J, Brown F (2000) Effects of posterior fossa decompression with and without duraplasty on Chiari malformation-associated hydromyelia. Neurosurgery 46:1384–1389, discussion 1389–1390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramirez LF, Thisted R (1989) Using a national health care data base to determine surgical complications in community hospitals: lumbar discectomy as an example. Neurosurgery 25:218–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yeh DD, Koch B, Crone KR (2006) Intraoperative ultrasonography used to determine the extent of surgery necessary during posterior fossa decompression in children with Chiari malformation type I. J Neurosurg 105:26–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aliaga L, Hekman KE, Yassari R, Straus D, Luther G, Chen J, Sampat A, Frim D (2012) A novel scoring system for assessing Chiari malformation type I treatment outcomes. Neurosurgery 70:656–664, discussion 664–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yarbrough CK, Greenberg JK, Smyth MD, Leonard JR, Park TS, Limbrick DD Jr (2014) External validation of the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale. J Neurosurg Pediatr In Press

  20. Rocque BG, George TM, Kestle J, Iskandar BJ (2011) Treatment practices for Chiari malformation type I with syringomyelia: results of a survey of the American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8:430–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bazarian JJ, Veazie P, Mookerjee S, Lerner EB (2006) Accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury case ascertainment using ICD-9 codes. Acad Emerg Med 13:31–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ventureyra EC, Aziz HA, Vassilyadi M (2003) The role of cine flow MRI in children with Chiari I malformation. Childs Nerv Syst 19:109–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McGirt MJ, Attenello FJ, Atiba A, Garces-Ambrossi G, Datoo G, Weingart JD, Carson B, Jallo GI (2008) Symptom recurrence after suboccipital decompression for pediatric Chiari I malformation: analysis of 256 consecutive cases. Childs Nerv Syst 24:1333–1339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mutchnick IS, Janjua RM, Moeller K, Moriarty TM (2010) Decompression of Chiari malformation with and without duraplasty: morbidity versus recurrence. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5:474–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Litvack ZN, Lindsay RA, Selden NR (2013) Dura splitting decompression for Chiari I malformation in pediatric patients: clinical outcomes, healthcare costs, and resource utilization. Neurosurgery 72:922–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Ethical standards

The Washington University in St. Louis Institutional Review Board approved this study, and it was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The Institutional Review Board waived the need for informed consent.

Funding

This work was supported by the Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences grants UL1 TR000448 and TL1 TR000449 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, A., Yarbrough, C.K., Greenberg, J.K. et al. Comparison of posterior fossa decompression with or without duraplasty in children with Type I Chiari malformation. Childs Nerv Syst 30, 1419–1424 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2424-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2424-5

Keywords

Navigation