Abstract
The nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of polypropylene/polystyrene (PP/PS) blends compatibilized or not with the linear triblock copolymer (styrene-ethylene-/butylene-styrene, SEBS) was investigated. Start-up of steady-shear at rates from 0.1 to 10 s−1 was carried out using a controlled strain rotational rheometer and a sliding plate rheometer for strain histories involving one or several shear rates. The shear stress and first normal shear stress difference were measured as functions of time, and the morphologies of the samples before and after shearing were determined. For each strain history except that involving a single shear rate of 0.1 s−1 the blends showed typical non-linear viscoelastic behavior: a shear stress overshoot/undershoot, depending on the history, followed by a steady state for each step. The first normal stress difference increased monotonically to a steady-state value. The values of the stresses increased with the addition of SEBS. The shear stress overshoot and undershoot and the times at which they occurred depended strongly on the strain history, decreasing for a subsequent shear rate step performed in the same direction as the former, and the time at which stress undershoot occurred increased for a subsequent shear rate step performed in the opposite direction, irrespective of the magnitude of the shear rate. This behavior was observed for all the blends studied. The time of overshoot in a single-step shear rate experiment is inversely proportional to the shear rate, and the steady-state value of N1 scaled linearly with shear rate, whereas the steady-state shear stress did not. The average diameter of the dispersed phase decreased for all strain histories when the blend was not compatibilized. When the blend was compatibilized, the average diameter of the dispersed phase changed only during the stronger flows. Experimental data were compared with the predictions of a model formulated using ideas of Doi and Ohta (1991), Lacroix et al. (1998) and Bousmina et al. (2001). The model correctly predicted the behavior of the uncompatibilized blends for single-step shear rates but not that of the compatibilized blends, nor did it predict morphologies after shearing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almusallam AS, Larson RG, Solomon MJ (2000) A constitutive model for the prediction of ellipsoidal droplet shapes and stresses in immiscible blends. J Rheol 44:1055–1083
Batchelor GK (1970) The stress system in a suspension of force-free particles. J Fluid Mech 41:545–570
Bousmina M, Aouina M, Chaudhry B, Guénette R, Bretas RES (2001) Rheology of polymers blends: non-linear model for viscoelastic emulsions undergoing high deformation flows. Rheol Acta 40:538–551
de Bruijin RA (1989) Deformation and breakup of drops in simple shear flows. PhD thesis, Edinhoven University of Technology, Edinhoven, The Netherlands
Dealy JM, Soong SS (1984) A parallel plate melt rheometer incorporating a shear stress transducer. J Rheol 28:355–365
Demarquette NR, Dealy JM (1992) Nonlinear viscoelasticity of concentrated polystyrene solutions: sliding plate rheometer studies. J Rheol 36:1007–1032
Doi M, Ohta T (1991) Dynamics and rheology of complex interfaces. I. J Chem Phys 95:1242–1248
Giacomin AJ, Samurkas T, Dealy JM (1989) A novel sliding plate rheometer for molten plastics. Polym Eng Sci 29:499–504
Grmela M, Bousmina M, Palierne JF (2001) On the rheology of immiscible blends. Rheol Acta 40:560–569
Guenther GK, Baird DG (1996) An evaluation of the Doi-Ohta theory for an immiscible polymer blend. J Rheol 40:1–20
Hayashi R, Takahashi M, Kajihara T, Yamane H (2001) Application of large double-step shear strain to analyze deformation and shape recovery of a polymer droplet in an immiscible polymer matrix. J Rheol 45:627–639
Iza M, Bousmina M, Jérôme R (2001) Rheology of compatibilizad immiscible viscoelastic polymer blends. Rheol Acta 40:10–22
Jackson NE, Tucker CL (2003) A model for large deformation of an ellipsoidal droplet with interfacial tension. J Rheol 47:659–682
Jeon HK, Macosko C (2003) Visualization of block copolymer distribution on a sheared drop. Polymer 44:5381–5386
Lacroix C, Grmela M, Carreau PJ (1998) Relationship between rheology and morphology for immiscible molten blends of polypropylene and ethylene copolymers under shear flow. J Rheol 42:41–62
Lacroix C, Grmela M, Carreau PJ (1999) Morphological evolution of immiscible polymer blends in simple shear and elongational flows. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 86:37-59
Lee HM, Park OO (1994) Rheology and dynamics of immiscible polymers blends. J Rheol 38:1405–1425
Macaúbas PHP (1999) Determinação da tensão interfacial entre materiais poliméricos através de medidas reológicas. Master dissertation, Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil
Macaúbas PHP, Demarquette NR (2001) Morphologies and interfacial tensions of immiscible polypropylene/polystyrene blends modified with triblock copolymers. Polymer 42:2543–2554
Maffetone PL, Minale M (1998) Equation of change for ellipsoidal drops in viscous flow. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 78:227–241
Onuki A (1987) Viscosity enhancement by domains in phase-separating fluids near the critical point: proposal of critical rheology. Phys Rev A 35:5149–5155
Osaki K, Ohta S, Fukuda M, Kurata M (1976) Nonlinear viscoelasticity of polystyrene solutions. III. Stress development at the start of steady shear flow and an experimental check of some constitutive models. J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 14:1701–1715
Takahashi Y, Kurashima N, Noda I, Doi M (1994a) Experimental tests of the scaling relation for textured materials in mixtures of two immiscible fluids. J Rheol 38:699–712
Takahashi Y, Kitade S, Kurashima N, Noda I (1994b) Viscoelastic properties of immiscible polymer blends under steady and transient shear flows. Polym J 26:1206–1212
Underwood EE (1970) Quantitative stereology. Addison Wesley, Reading MA
Velankar S, Puyvelde PV, Mewis J, Moldenaers P (2001) Effect of compatibilization on the breakup of polymeric drops in shear flow. J Rheol 45:1007–1019
Velankar S, Puyvelde PV, Mewis J, Moldenaers P (2004) Steady-shear rheological properties of model compatibilized blends. J Rheol 48:725–744
Vinckier I, Moldenaers P, Mewis J (1996) Relationship between rheology and morphology of model lends in steady shear flow. J Rheol 40:613–631
Yu W, Bousmina M (2003) Ellipsoidal model for droplet deformation in emulsions. J Rheol 47:1011–1039
Yu W, Bousmina M, Grmela M, Palierne JF, Zhou C (2002) Quantitative relationship between rheology and morphology in emulsions. J Rheol 46:1381–1399
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Polibrasil S.A., BASF, and Shell Chemical for the samples used, and FAPESP for financial support (projects 98/16294-1, 99/05898-6). The authors are greatly indebted to Prof. Mosto Bousmina of l’Université Laval for his helpful comments, and to the reviewers for their suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Macaúbas, P.H.P., Demarquette, N.R. & Dealy, J.M. Nonlinear viscoelasticity of PP/PS/SEBS blends. Rheol Acta 44, 295–312 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-004-0411-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-004-0411-6