Abstract
Aim and method
To identify Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) endocervical infection among gestations at risk for preterm birth by means of DNA amplification.
Results
One hundred fifty eight (n = 158) gestations of Guayaquil (63.3%) and Quito (36.7%) Ecuador, at risk for preterm birth: threatened preterm labor (TPL, 60.8%) and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM, 39.2%) were recruited. CT infection was presented in 8.2% of cases (TPL: 10.4% and PPROM: 4.8%). No significant difference was observed in this frequency in regard to city or diagnosis.
Conclusion
Although the causative role of CT infection for these antenatal complications cannot be completely ruled out, its presence may justify an antenatal routine screening program in order to provide appropriate therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Claman P, Toye B, Peeling RW et al (1995) Serologic evidence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and risk of preterm birth. CMAJ 153:259–262
Dong ZW, Li Y, Zhang LY et al (1998) Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis intrauterine infection using polymerase chain reaction on chorionic villi. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 61:29–32
Matthews-Greer JM, McRae KL, LaHaye EB et al (2001) Validation of the Roche COBAS Amplicor system for Chlamydia trachomatis. Clin Lab Sci 14:82–84
Paavonen J, Eggert-Kruse W (1999) Chlamydia trachomatis: impact on human reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 5:433–447
Park KH, Chaiworapongsa T, Kim YM et al (2003) Matrix metalloproteinase 3 in parturition, premature rupture of the membranes, and microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. J Perinat Med 31:12–22
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by grant no. PIC-035-2005 awarded by FUNDACYT (Foundation for Science and Technology of Ecuador).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Medina, M., Moya, W., Hidalgo, L. et al. Molecular identification of endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection among gestations at risk for preterm birth in Ecuador. Arch Gynecol Obstet 279, 9–10 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0647-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0647-y