Abstract
In transcervical resection of the submandibular gland for benign lesions, only a limited risk of damage to neural structures can be accepted and a cosmetically satisfactory result is mandatory. In this retrospective case series, we evaluated 139 patients operated over a 10-year period and completed long-term clinical follow-up of 113 of these patients after a median of 81 months. In all patients, the operation was effective. We found a 4.3 % risk of reoperation for wound infection or postoperative hematomas and an 18.7 % risk of early paresis of the marginal branch of the facial nerve, which decreased to 2.7 % on long-term follow-up. We found a 4.4 % risk of permanent lingual nerve paresis, and no patients had damage to the hypoglossal nerve. Xerostomia was found in 22.1 % of the patients and could be quantified by the easily performed biscuit test. Only 2.5 % reported an unsatisfactory cosmetic result and all scars were ≤6 on the Vancouver Scar Scale. Problems with scarring were more common if there had been postoperative infection. We continue to use the lateral transcervical approach as standard in our institution for patients who cannot be managed by gland-sparing procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hald J, Andreassen UK (1994) Submandibular gland excision: short and long-term complications. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 56(2):87–91
Winkel R, Overgaard TI, Balle VH, Charabi S (2000) Surgical results of submandibular gland excision. Ugeskr Laeg 162(40):5354–5357
McGurk M, Makdissi J, Brown JE (2004) Intra-oral removal of stones from the hilum of the submandibular gland: report of technique and morbidity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33(7):683–686
Milton CM, Thomas BM, Bickerton RC (1986) Morbidity study of submandibular gland excision. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 68(3):148–150
Rallis G, Mourouzis C, Zachariades N (2004) A study of 55 submandibular salivary gland excisions. Gen Dent 52(5):420–423
Ichimura K, Nibu K, Tanaka T (1997) Nerve paralysis after surgery in the submandibular triangle: review of University of Tokyo Hospital experience. Head Neck 19(1):48–53
Preuss SF, Klussmann JP, Wittekindt C, Drebber U, Beutner D, Guntinas-Lichius O (2007) Submandibular gland excision: 15 years of experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65(5):953–957
Kukuckova B, Svec M (2011) Surgical management of submandibulary gland diseases: 10 years of experience. Bratisl Lek Listy 112(5):264–268
Vercelli S, Ferriero G, Sartorio F, Stissi V, Franchignoni F (2009) How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures. Disabil Rehabil 31(25):2055–2063
Sullivan T, Smith J, Kermode J, McIver E, Courtemanche DJ (1990) Rating the burn scar. J Burn Care Rehabil 11(3):256–260
Beahm DD, Peleaz L, Nuss DW, Schaitkin B, Sedlmayr JC, Rivera-Serrano CM et al (2009) Surgical approaches to the submandibular gland: a review of literature. Int J Surg 7(6):503–509
Marchal F, Dulguerov P, Becker M, Barki G, Disant F, Lehmann W (2002) Submandibular diagnostic and interventional sialendoscopy: new procedure for ductal disorders. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 111(1):27–35
Møller MN, Sørensen CH (2012) Risk of marginal mandibular nerve injury in neck dissection. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(2):601–605
Cunning DM, Lipke N, Wax MK (1998) Significance of unilateral submandibular gland excision on salivary flow in non-cancer patients. Laryngoscope 108(6):812–815
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Springborg, L.K., Møller, M.N. Submandibular gland excision: long-term clinical outcome in 139 patients operated in a single institution. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270, 1441–1446 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2175-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2175-4