Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison between the magnetic scleral search coil and infrared reflection methods for saccadic eye movement analysis

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A non-invasive eye tracking system, based on pulsed infrared light (IR), was compared with the magnetic scleral search coil method (MSC) for saccadic eye movement recordings.

Methods

Ten normal subjects performed horizontal and vertical saccades recorded with both methods. Eight recordings were complete and analysed for maximum peak velocity (VMAX) and constant (C) of the main sequence curve.

Results

The IR recordings showed significantly higher peak velocity values than the MSC system and generally more inter-individual variability. No significant difference regarding peak velocity was detected between abducting and adducting saccades or between upward and downward saccades with either of the systems. Horizontal saccades had higher peak velocities with both techniques.

Conclusions

Comparison of the main sequence plots of the IR and MSC eye tracking techniques reveals that the IR system yields higher values of maximum peak velocity and the constant, the differences being similar for eye movements in different directions. There are various possible explanations for the lower maximum velocity of the MSC recordings, e.g. slipping of the coil annulus on the surface of the eye and a change of the oculomotor command signal induced by wearing the coil. Also, artefacts associated with the IR recording system may cause overestimations of the saccadic velocity and, furthermore, contribute to the higher variability of the IR recordings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abel LA, Troost BT, Dell’Osso LF (1983) The effects of age on normal saccadic characteristics and their variability. Vision Res 23:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abrams RA, Chasteen AL, Pratt J (1998) Aging and movement: variability of force pulses for saccadic eye movements. Psychol Aging 13(3):387–395

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bahill AT, Clark MR, Stark L (1975) The main sequence, a tool for studying human eye movements. Math Biosci 24:191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bahill AT, Stark L (1975) Overlapping saccades and glissades are produced by fatigue in the saccadic eye movement system. Exp Neurol 48:95–106

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bahill AT, Brockenbrough A, Troost BT (1981) Variability and development of a normative data base for saccadic eye movements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 21:116–125

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bolzani R, Tian S, Ygge J, Lennerstrand G (1998) A computer based system for acquisition, recording and analysis of 3D eye movement signals. In: Lennerstrand G (ed) Proceedings of the ISA meeting in Maastricht. Pergamon, New York, pp 99–102

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collewijn H, van der Mark F, Jansen TC (1975) Precise recording of human eye movements. Vision Res 15:447–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Collewijn H, Erkelens CJ, Steinman RM (1988) Binocular co-ordination of human horizontal saccadic eye movements. J Physiol 404:157–182

    Google Scholar 

  9. Collewijn H, Erkelens CJ, Steinman RM (1995) Voluntary binocular gaze-shifts in the plane of regard: dynamics of version and vergence. Vision Res 35(23–24):3335–3358

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feldon SE, Levin L, Liu SK (1990) Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Correlation of saccadic eye movements with age, presence of optic neuropathy, and extraocular muscle volume. Arch Ophthalmol 108:1568–1571

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frens MA, van der Geest JN (2002) Scleral search coils influence saccade dynamics. J Neurophysiol 88:692–698

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fuchs AF, Binder MD (1983) Fatigue resistance of human extraocular muscles. J Neurophysiol 49:28–34

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guitton D, Simard R, Codere F (1991) Upper eyelid movements measured with a search coil during blinks and vertical saccades. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32:3298–3305

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huaman AG, Sharpe JA (1993) Vertical saccades in senescence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:2588–2595

    Google Scholar 

  15. Irving EL, Zacher JE, Allison RS, Callender MG (2003) Effects of scleral search coil wear on visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:1933–1938

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mauri L, Meienberg O, Roth E, Konig MP (1984) Evaluation of endocrine ophthalmopathy with saccadic eye movements. J Neurol 231:182–187

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moschner C, Baloh RW (1994) Age-related changes in visual tracking. J Gerontol 49(5):235–238

    Google Scholar 

  18. Munoz DP, Broughton JR, Goldring JE, Armstrong LT (1998) Age-related performance of human subjects on saccadic eye movement tasks. Exp Brain Res 121:391–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ober J (1994) Infra-red reflection technique. In: Ygge J, Lennerstrand L (ed) Eye movements in reading, Wenner-Gren International Series. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 9–19

    Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson DA (1963) A method of measuring eye movements using a scleral coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Trans Biomed Electr 10:137–145

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schworm HD, Boergen KP (2000) Preliminary report: saccade analysis in acute Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Strabismus 8:179–185

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schworm HD, Heufelder AE, Kunze A, Welge E, Boergen KP (2000) Clinical significance of saccade analysis in early active Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:1710–1718

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smeets JBJ, Hooge ITC (2003) Nature of variability of saccades. J Neurophysiol 90:12–20

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smit AC, Van Gisbergen JAM, Cools AR (1987) A parametric analysis of human saccades in different experimental paradigms. Vision Res 27:1745–1762

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sonderegger EN, Meienberg O, Ehrengruber H (1986) Normative data of saccadic eye movements for routine diagnosis of ophthalmoneurological disorders. Neuro-Ophthalmology 6:257–269

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spooner JW, Sakala SM, Baloh RW (1980) Effect of aging on eye tracking. Arch Neurol 37:575–576

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stahl JS, van Alpen AM, De Zeeuw CI (2000) A comparison of video and magnetic search coil recordings of mouse eye movements. J Neurosci Methods 99:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  28. Straube A, Robinson FR, Fuchs AF (1997) Decrease in saccadic performance after many visually guided saccadic eye movements in monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38(13):2810–2816

    Google Scholar 

  29. Truong DM, Feldon SE (1987) Sources of artifact in infrared recording of eye movement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 28:1018–1022

    Google Scholar 

  30. van der Geest JN, Frens MA (2002) Recording eye movements with video-oculography and scleral search coils: a direct comparison of two methods. J Neurosci Methods 114:185–195

    Google Scholar 

  31. van Opstal AJ, van Gisbergen JA (1987) Skewness of saccadic velocity profiles: a unifying parameter of normal and slow saccades. Vision Res 27(5):731–745

    Google Scholar 

  32. Warabi T, Kase M, Kato T (1984) Effect of aging on the accuracy of visually guided saccadic eye movement. Ann Neurol 16:449–454

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wilson SJ, Glue P, Ball D, Nutt DJ (1993) Saccadic eye movement parameters in normal subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 86:69–74

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wouters RJ, Van den Bosch WA, Lemij HG (1998) Saccadic eye movements in Graves’ disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:1544–1550

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ygge J, Bolzani R, Tian S, Lennerstrand G (1999) A computer based system for acquisition, recording and analysis of 3D eye movement signals. In: Pritchard C (ed) Transactions of the IX International Orthoptic Congress, Stockholm, Sweden, pp 91–94

  36. Zingale CM, Kowler E (1987) Planning sequences of saccades. Vision Res 27:1327–1341

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors like to thank Dr T. Pansell for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Träisk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Träisk, F., Bolzani, R. & Ygge, J. A comparison between the magnetic scleral search coil and infrared reflection methods for saccadic eye movement analysis. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243, 791–797 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-1148-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-1148-3

Keywords

Navigation