Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal unity-magnitude input shaper duration analysis

  • Original
  • Published:
Archive of Applied Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Command profiles are required to move a dynamical system from rest to rest without residual vibration in a minimum time. The unity-magnitude (UM) input shaper is one of the faster input shaping techniques. However, analytical solution of the impulse time locations is impossible due to the dependent residual vibration constraint equations. Many researchers solve these by using curve fitting. In this paper, the characteristics of the UM shaping coefficients as a function of system parameters are investigated. An analysis procedure to obtain UM input shaper impulse time sequences is presented. Finally, the proposed technique is compared to the zero vibration (ZV) shaper in both response and robustness to modeling error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

V :

residual vibration

A i :

impulse amplitude

t i :

time location (s)

ω:

vibration frequency (Hz)

ξ:

damping ratio

n :

number of impulses

References

  1. Singhose WE., Seering W., Singer N. Residual vibration reduction using vector diagrams to generate shaped inputs. J. Mech. Des. 654–659, (1994)

  2. Smith OJM., (1958) Feedback control systems. McGraw–Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ho HT., (1997) Fast servo bang–bang seek control. IEEE Trans. Magn. 33(6):4522–4527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gürleyük SS. (2005) Vibration reduction in a step motor using optimal control time intervals and amplitudes. Acta Mech. 177(1):137–148

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Orpacharapan CLa., Pao LY. (2004) Shaped time-optimal feedback control for disk-drive systems with back-electromotive force. IEEE Trans. Magn. 40(1):85–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Singhose WE., Porter L., Kenison M., Kriikku E. (2000) Effects of hoisting on the input shaping control of gantry cranes. Control Eng. Prac. 8:1159–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singhose, WE., Pao, LY., Seering, WP.: Time-optimal rest-to-rest slewing of multi mode flexible spacecraft using ZVD robustness constraints. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; pp. 1–9 (1996)

  8. Piazzi A., Visioli A. (2000) Minimum-time system-inversion-based motion planning for residual vibration reduction. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mech. 5(1):12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Teo CL., Ong CJ., Xu M. (1998) Pulse input sequences for the residual vibration reduction. J. Sound Vib. 211(2):157–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pelaez G., Pelaez Gu., Perez JM., Vizan A., Bautista E. (2005) Input shaping reference commands for trajectory following cartesian machines. Control. Eng Prac. 13(8):941–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakanoa K., Sudab Y., Nakadaic S. (2003) Self-powered active vibration control using a single electric actuator. J. Sound Vib. 260: 213–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pao, LY., Singhose, WE.: Unity magnitude input shapers and their relation to time optimal control. Proceedings of the 1996 IFAC World Congress. San Francisco, USA (1996)

  13. Hyde JM., Cutkosky MR. Controlling contact transition. IEEE Control Syst. 25–30 (1994)

  14. Singhose, WE., Mills, BW.: Command generation using specified-negative-amplitude input shapers. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference. San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 61–65 (1999)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sırrı Sunay Gürleyük.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gürleyük, S.S. Optimal unity-magnitude input shaper duration analysis. Arch Appl Mech 77, 63–71 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-006-0080-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-006-0080-2

Keywords

Navigation