Abstract
Command profiles are required to move a dynamical system from rest to rest without residual vibration in a minimum time. The unity-magnitude (UM) input shaper is one of the faster input shaping techniques. However, analytical solution of the impulse time locations is impossible due to the dependent residual vibration constraint equations. Many researchers solve these by using curve fitting. In this paper, the characteristics of the UM shaping coefficients as a function of system parameters are investigated. An analysis procedure to obtain UM input shaper impulse time sequences is presented. Finally, the proposed technique is compared to the zero vibration (ZV) shaper in both response and robustness to modeling error.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- V :
-
residual vibration
- A i :
-
impulse amplitude
- t i :
-
time location (s)
- ω:
-
vibration frequency (Hz)
- ξ:
-
damping ratio
- n :
-
number of impulses
References
Singhose WE., Seering W., Singer N. Residual vibration reduction using vector diagrams to generate shaped inputs. J. Mech. Des. 654–659, (1994)
Smith OJM., (1958) Feedback control systems. McGraw–Hill, New York
Ho HT., (1997) Fast servo bang–bang seek control. IEEE Trans. Magn. 33(6):4522–4527
Gürleyük SS. (2005) Vibration reduction in a step motor using optimal control time intervals and amplitudes. Acta Mech. 177(1):137–148
Orpacharapan CLa., Pao LY. (2004) Shaped time-optimal feedback control for disk-drive systems with back-electromotive force. IEEE Trans. Magn. 40(1):85–96
Singhose WE., Porter L., Kenison M., Kriikku E. (2000) Effects of hoisting on the input shaping control of gantry cranes. Control Eng. Prac. 8:1159–1165
Singhose, WE., Pao, LY., Seering, WP.: Time-optimal rest-to-rest slewing of multi mode flexible spacecraft using ZVD robustness constraints. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; pp. 1–9 (1996)
Piazzi A., Visioli A. (2000) Minimum-time system-inversion-based motion planning for residual vibration reduction. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mech. 5(1):12–22
Teo CL., Ong CJ., Xu M. (1998) Pulse input sequences for the residual vibration reduction. J. Sound Vib. 211(2):157–177
Pelaez G., Pelaez Gu., Perez JM., Vizan A., Bautista E. (2005) Input shaping reference commands for trajectory following cartesian machines. Control. Eng Prac. 13(8):941–958
Nakanoa K., Sudab Y., Nakadaic S. (2003) Self-powered active vibration control using a single electric actuator. J. Sound Vib. 260: 213–235
Pao, LY., Singhose, WE.: Unity magnitude input shapers and their relation to time optimal control. Proceedings of the 1996 IFAC World Congress. San Francisco, USA (1996)
Hyde JM., Cutkosky MR. Controlling contact transition. IEEE Control Syst. 25–30 (1994)
Singhose, WE., Mills, BW.: Command generation using specified-negative-amplitude input shapers. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference. San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 61–65 (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gürleyük, S.S. Optimal unity-magnitude input shaper duration analysis. Arch Appl Mech 77, 63–71 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-006-0080-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-006-0080-2