Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear form-finding of symmetric cable–strut structures using stiffness submatrices associated with full symmetry subspace

  • Original
  • Published:
Archive of Applied Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An efficient and nonlinear form-finding method is proposed for symmetric cable–strut structures with complex geometry or many nodes. Expressed in the symmetry-adapted coordinate system, the first block matrix of the symmetry-adapted tangent stiffness matrix is extracted using the full symmetry subspace, which is much smaller-sized and associated with the first irreducible representation of a symmetry group. Then, this stiffness submatrix and the principle of minimum potential energy are adopted for the fast but stable convergence of the initial configuration to the stable configuration. During the form-finding process, the generalized inverse of a matrix and modification for the minimum eigenvalues are employed, to guarantee the positive definiteness of the stiffness submatrix. The form-finding process can start from an arbitrary initial configuration, whereas only certain symmetry group, and the connectivity pattern and the initial lengths of the members should be given in advance. A few numerical examples are illustrated to show the efficiency and accuracy of the form-finding method for cable–strut structures with complex geometry and different symmetry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feng, X., Guo, S.: A novel method of determining the sole configuration of tensegrity structures. Mech. Res. Commun. 69, 66–78 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Connelly, R., Whiteley, W.: Second- order rigidity and prestress stability for tensegrity frameworks. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 9, 453–491 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Jordán, T., Recski, A., Szabadka, Z.: Rigid tensegrity labelings of graphs. Eur. J. Comb. 30, 1887–1895 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ingber, D.E.: Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J. Cell Sci. 116, 1157–1173 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stamenović, D.: Effects of cytoskeletal prestress on cell rheological behavior. Acta Biomater. 1, 255–262 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lazopoulos, K.A., Lazopoulou, N.K.: Stability of a tensegrity structure: application to cell mechanics. Arch. Appl. Mech. 75, 289–301 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fraternali, F., De Chiara, E., Skelton, R.E.: On the use of tensegrity structures for kinetic solar facades of smart buildings. Smart Mater. Struct. 24, 105032 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yuan, X.F., Dong, S.L.: Integral feasible prestress of cable domes. Comput. Struct. 81, 2111–2119 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaveh, A., Nikbakht, M.: Stability analysis of hyper symmetric skeletal structures using group theory. Acta Mech. 200, 177–197 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou, J., Chen, W., Zhao, B., Dong, S.: A feasible symmetric state of initial force design for cable-strut structures. Arch. Appl. Mech. 87, 1385–1397 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tran, H.C., Lee, J.: Form-finding of tensegrity structures with multiple states of self-stress. Acta Mech. 222, 131–147 (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Paul, C., Valero-Cuevas, F.J., Lipson, H.: Design and control of tensegrity robots for locomotion. IEEE Trans. Robot. 22, 944–957 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rovira, A.G., Tur, J.M.M.: Control and simulation of a tensegrity-based mobile robot. Robot. Auton. Syst. 57, 526–535 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sultan, C., Skelton, R.: Deployment of tensegrity structures. Int. J. Solids Struct. 40, 4637–4657 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Connelly, R., Back, A.: Mathematics and Tensegrity: group and representation theory make it possible to form a complete catalogue of “strut-cable” constructions with prescribed symmetries. Am. Sci. 86, 142–151 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schek, H.J.: The force density method for form finding and computation of general networks. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. 3, 115–134 (1974)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Koohestani, K., Guest, S.D.: A new approach to the analytical and numerical form-finding of tensegrity structures. Int. J. Solids Struct. 50, 2995–3007 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, J.Y., Ohsaki, M.: Adaptive force density method for form-finding problem of tensegrity structures. Int. J. Solids Struct. 43, 5658–5673 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Pellegrino, S., Tibert, A.G.: Review of form-finding methods for tensegrity structures. Int. J. Space Struct. 18, 209–223 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pagitz, M., Mirats Tur, J.M.: Finite element based form-finding algorithm for tensegrity structures. Int. J. Solids Struct. 46, 3235–3240 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, L., Maurin, B., Motro, R.: Form-finding of nonregular tensegrity systems. J. Struct. Eng. 132, 1435–1440 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bel Hadj Ali, N., Rhode-Barbarigos, L., Smith, I.F.C.: Analysis of clustered tensegrity structures using a modified dynamic relaxation algorithm. Int. J. Solids Struct. 48, 637–647 (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Rieffel, J., Valero-Cuevas, F., Lipson, H.: Automated discovery and optimization of large irregular tensegrity structures. Comput. Struct. 87, 368–379 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, X., Wang, Y., Luo, Y.: Finding member connectivities and nodal positions of tensegrity structures based on force density method and mixed integer nonlinear programming. Eng. Struct. 166, 240–250 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen, Y., Feng, J., Wu, Y.: Novel form-finding of tensegrity structures using ant colony systems. J. Mech. Robot. 4, 031001 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Masic, M., Skelton, R.E., Gill, P.E.: Algebraic tensegrity form-finding. Int. J. Solids Struct. 42, 4833–4858 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Estrada, G.G., Bungartz, H.J., Mohrdieck, C.: Numerical form-finding of 2D tensegrity structures. Int. J. Solids Struct. 43, 6855–6868 (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Kawaguchi, M., Tatemichi, I., Chen, P.S.: Optimum shapes of a cable dome structure. Eng. Struct. 21, 719–725 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, L., Li, Y., Cao, Y., Feng, X., Gao, H.: Self-equilibrium and super-stability of truncated regular polyhedral tensegrity structures: a unified analytical solution. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 468, 3323–3347 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, Y., Sun, Q., Feng, J.: Group-theoretical form-finding of cable-strut structures based on irreducible representations for rigid-body translations. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 144, 205–215 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, P., Feng, J.: Initial prestress design and optimization of tensegrity systems based on symmetry and stiffness. Int. J. Solids Struct. 106, 68–90 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li, Y., Feng, X., Cao, Y., Gao, H.: A Monte Carlo form-finding method for large scale regular and irregular tensegrity structures. Int. J. Solids Struct. 47, 1888–1898 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, L.Y., Li, Y., Cao, Y.P., Feng, X.Q.: Stiffness matrix based form-finding method of tensegrity structures. Eng. Struct. 58, 36–48 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tran, H.C., Lee, J.: Advanced form-finding for cable-strut structures. Int. J. Solids Struct. 47, 1785–1794 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen, Y., Feng, J., Ma, R., Zhang, Y.: Efficient symmetry method for calculating integral prestress modes of statically indeterminate cable-strut structures. J. Struct. Eng. 141, 04014240 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chen, Y., Yan, J., Sareh, P., Feng, J.: Feasible prestressmodes for cable-strut structures with multiple selfstress states using particle swarm optimization. J. Comput. Civil Eng. 34, 04020003 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Connelly, R., Fowler, P.W., Guest, S.D., Schulze, B., Whiteley, W.J.: When is a symmetric pin-jointed framework isostatic? Int. J. Solids Struct. 46, 762–773 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen, Y., Sareh, P., Feng, J., Sun, Q.: A computational method for automated detection of engineering structures with cyclic symmetries. Comput. Struct. 191, 153–164 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zingoni, A.: Group-theoretic exploitations of symmetry in computational solid and structural mechanics. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 79, 253–289 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Zloković, G.M.: Group Theory and \(G\)-vector Spaces in Structures: Vibrations, Stability, and Status. E. Horwood, Chichester (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Kangwai, R.D., Guest, S.D.: Symmetry-adapted equilibrium matrices. Int. J. Solids Struct. 37, 1525–1548 (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang, J.Y., Guest, S.D., Ohsaki, M.: Symmetric prismatic tensegrity structures: part I. Configuration and stability. Int. J. Solids Struct. 46, 1–14 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Guest, S.D.: The stiffness of prestressed frameworks: a unifying approach. Int. J. Solids Struct. 43, 842–854 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen, Y., Feng, J., Zhang, Y.T.: A necessary condition for stability of kinematically indeterminate pin-jointed structures with symmetry. Mech. Res. Commun. 60, 64–73 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sultan, C.: Stiffness formulations and necessary and sufficient conditions for exponential stability of prestressable structures. Int. J. Solids Struct. 50, 2180–2195 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Chen, Y., Sun, Q., Feng, J.: Stiffness degradation of prestressed cable-strut structures observed from variations of lower frequencies. Acta Mech. 229, 3319–3332 (2018)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang, J.Y., Ohsaki, M.: Self-equilibrium and stability of regular truncated tetrahedral tensegrity structures. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 60, 1757–1770 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang, L., Zhao, Z., Zhang, Q., Feng, X.: Chirality induced by structural transformation in a tensegrity: theory and experiment. J. Appl. Mech. 83, 041003 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chen, Y., Feng, J., Sun, Q.: Lower-order symmetric mechanism modes and bifurcation behavior of deployable bar structures with cyclic symmetry. Int. J. Solids Struct. 139–140, 1–14 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Luo, Y., Dong, S.: Calculating of initial prestress for cable-strut tensile structures. J. Build. Struct. 21, 59–64 (2000). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zingoni, A.: Symmetry recognition in group-theoretic computational schemes for complex structural systems. Comput. Struct. 94–95, 34–44 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chen, Y., Sareh, P., Yan, J., Fallah, A.S., Feng, J.: An integrated geometric-graph-theoretic approach to representing origami structures and their corresponding truss frameworks. J. Mech. Des. Trans. ASME 141, 091402 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51978150 and 51850410513) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. The first author would like to acknowledge financial support from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for his visiting research at Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH, Germany. The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yao Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Yan, J. & Feng, J. Nonlinear form-finding of symmetric cable–strut structures using stiffness submatrices associated with full symmetry subspace. Arch Appl Mech 90, 1783–1794 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-020-01696-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-020-01696-1

Keywords

Navigation