Skip to main content
Log in

Use of continuous glucose monitoring in normoglycemic, insulin-resistant women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare fasting and post-prandial glucose concentrations measured in venous blood with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived values, with and without prior exercise, in insulin-resistant, normoglycemic women. Interstitial and venous glucose concentrations were assessed in ten sedentary, overweight/obese African-American women following a sedentary condition (75 min of rest) and following an exercise condition (75 min of brisk walking on a treadmill). Ninety minutes after rest or exercise, participants completed an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). In response to the OGTT, CGM-derived glucose area under the curves (AUC) were lower than venous values in the exercise condition (−25%, p = 0.03) but this difference was attenuated in the sedentary condition (−10%, p = 0.09). Additionally, CGM-derived absolute glucose values (mMol) were significantly lower compared to venous values during the sedentary (p = 0.007) and exercise conditions (p = 0.006). Overall, there was a moderately strong relationship between venous and CGM-derived glucose AUC (r 2 = 0.68) but the CGM-derived values were consistently lower in this study group. Although CGM provided more information regarding post-prandial glucose responses, these results suggest that CGM may not closely match venous glucose measurements in normoglycemic participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aussedat B, Dupire-Angel M et al (2000) Interstitial glucose concentration and glycemia: implications for continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 278:E716–E728

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolinder J, Ungerstedt U et al (1992) Microdialysis measurement of the absolute glucose concentration in subcutaneous adipose tissue allowing glucose monitoring in diabetic patients. Diabetologia 35:1177–1180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braun B, Butterfield GE et al (1998) Women at altitude: changes in carbohydrate metabolism at 4,300-m elevation and across the menstrual cycle. J Appl Physiol 85:1966–1973

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braun B, Sharoff C et al (2004) Effects of insulin resistance on substrate utilization during exercise in overweight women. J Appl Physiol 97:991–997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cartee GD, Young DA et al (1989) Prolonged increase in insulin-stimulated glucose transport in muscle after exercise. Am J Physiol 256:E494–E499

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cauza E, Hanusch-Enserer U et al (2005) Strength and endurance training lead to different post exercise glucose profiles in diabetic participants using a continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring system. Eur J Clin Invest 35:745–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheyne E, Kerr D (2002) Making ‘sense’ of diabetes: using a continuous glucose sensor in clinical practice. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 18:S43–S48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chico A, Vidal-Rios P et al (2003) The continuous glucose monitoring system is useful for detecting unrecognized hypoglycemias in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes but is not better than frequent capillary glucose measurements for improving metabolic control. Diabetes Care 26:1153–1157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claremont DJ, Sambrook IE et al (1986) Subcutaneous implantation of a ferrocene-mediated glucose sensor in pigs. Diabetologia 29:817–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond MP, Grainger DA et al (1993) Counter-regulatory response to hypoglycemia in the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 60:988–993

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diseases, N. I. o. D. a. D. a. K. (2008) National Diabetes Statistics, 2007 fact sheet. Bethesda, MD, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health

  • Gross TM, Bode BW et al (2000) Performance evaluation of the MiniMed continuous glucose monitoring system during patient home use. Diabetes Technol Ther 2:49–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson RE, Freedson PS et al (2006) Postexercise insulin action in African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc 98:1832–1839

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kost GJ, Vu HT et al (1998) Multicenter study of oxygen-sensitive handheld glucose point-of-care testing in critical care/hospital/ambulatory patients in the United States and Canada. Crit Care Med 26:581–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kulcu E, Tamada JA et al (2003) Physiological differences between interstitial glucose and blood glucose measured in human subjects. Diabetes Care 26:2405–2409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lagarde WH, Barrows FP et al (2006) Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Pediatr Diabetes 7(3):159–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mastrototaro J (2000) The MiniMed continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther 2:S13–S18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA (1999) Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care 22:1462–1470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monsod TP, Flanagan DE et al (2002) Do sensor glucose levels accurately predict plasma glucose concentrations during hypoglycemia and hyperinsulinemia? Diabetes Care 25:889–893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer EF, Meyerhoff C et al (1993) On line continuous monitoring of subcutaneous tissue glucose is feasible by combining portable glucosensor with microdialysis. Horm Metab Res 25:121–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pickup JC, Shaw GW et al (1989) In vivo molecular sensing in diabetes mellitus: an implantable glucose sensor with direct electron transfer. Diabetologia 32:213–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rebrin K, Steil GM et al (1999) Subcutaneous glucose predicts plasma glucose independent of insulin: implications for continuous monitoring. Am J Physiol 277:E561–E571

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt FJ, Sluiter WJ et al (1993) Glucose concentration in subcutaneous extracellular space. Diabetes Care 16:695–700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stolk RP, Orchard TJ et al (1995) Why use the oral glucose tolerance test? Diabetes Care 18:1045–1049

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanenberg R, Bode B et al (2004) Use of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System to guide therapy in patients with insulin-treated diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc 79:1521–1526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thome-Duret V, Reach G et al (1996) Use of a subcutaneous glucose sensor to detect decreases in glucose concentration prior to observation in blood. Anal Chem 68:3822–3826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toth EL, Suthijumroon A et al (1987) Insulin action does not change during the menstrual cycle in normal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 64:74–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yates K, Hasnat Milton A et al (2006) Continuous glucose monitoring-guided insulin adjustment in children and adolescents on near-physiological insulin regimens: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 29:1512–1517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the research participants for enthusiasm and their commitment of time and effort. We also acknowledge helpful assistance from Priscilla Clarkson, Ph.D., Stuart Chipkin, M.D., David Pober, Ph.D., Carrie Sharoff, Ph.D., Todd Hagobian, Ph.D., Kaila Holtz, M.S. and Cheryl Howe, Ph.D.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barry Braun.

Additional information

Communicated by Susan Ward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hasson, R.E., Freedson, P.S. & Braun, B. Use of continuous glucose monitoring in normoglycemic, insulin-resistant women. Eur J Appl Physiol 108, 1181–1187 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1325-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1325-x

Keywords

Navigation