Abstract
This paper examines the relative importance of exposure and susceptibility to the infection of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with the trematode parasite Diplostomum spathaceum under natural conditions. A total of 93 individually marked, similarly aged fish were introduced into three cages at regular time intervals and the intensity of infection in individuals recorded by counting parasites in live fish using ophthalmic techniques. Fish introduced into the cages became infected faster than fish that were already in the cages, indicating that fish developed resistance to infection after repeated exposure. Fish kept in the cages experienced similar levels of exposure and the distribution of parasites between these fish was not significantly different from a random distribution. In contrast, parasites from 16 Finnish wild roach populations were highly aggregated. The differences between the caged fish and the wild fish indicate that the aggregated distribution in wild fish might be determined by variations in exposure rather than variations in susceptibility between fish. This is one of the few studies to demonstrate the development of resistance in fish against the parasite under natural conditions, and to attempt to separate exposure and susceptibility as causative agents of parasite aggregation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaltonen TM, Valtonen ET, Jokinen EI (1997) Humoral response of roach (Rutilus rutilus) to digenean Rhipidocotyle fennica infection. Parasitology 114:285–291
Anderson RM, May RM (1978) Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions. I. Regulatory processes. J Anim Ecol 47:219–247
Boag B, Lello J, Fenton A, Tompkins DM, Hudson PJ (2001) Patterns of parasite aggregation in the wild European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Int J Parasitol 31:1421–1428
Bortz BM, Kenny GE, Pauley GB, Garcia-Ortigoza E, Anderson DP (1984) The immune response in immunized and naturally infected rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) to Diplostomum spathaceum as detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Dev Comp Immunol 8:813–822
Buchmann K, Uldal A (1994) Effects of eyefluke infections on the growth of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in a mariculture system. Bull Eur Assoc Fish Pathol 14:104–107
Burrough RJ (1978) The population biology of two species of eyefluke, Diplostomum spathaceum and Tylodelphys clavata, in roach and rudd. J Fish Biol 13:19–32
Chappell LH, Hardie LJ, Secombes CJ (1994) Diplostomiasis: the disease and host-parasite interactions. In: Pike AW, Lewis JW (eds) Parasitic diseases of fish. Samara, Dyfed, pp 59–86
Crowden AE, Broom DM (1980) Effects of the eyefluke, Diplostomum spathaceum, on the behaviour of dace (Leuciscus leuciscus). Anim Behav 28:287–294
Ellis AE (1988) Fish vaccination. Academic Press, London
Field JS, Irwin SWB (1994) The epidemiology, treatment and control of diplostomiasis on a fish farm in Northern Ireland. In: Pike AW, Lewis JW (eds) Parasitic diseases of fish. Samara, Dyfed, pp 87–100
Hudson PJ, Rizzoli A, Grenfell BT, Heesterbeek H, Dobson AP (2002) The ecology of wildlife diseases. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hellriegel B (2001) Immunoepidemiology—bridging the gap between immunology and epidemiology. Trends Parasitol 17:102–106
Höglund J, Thuvander A (1990) Indications of non-specific protective mechanisms in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss with diplostomosis. Dis Aquat Organ 8:91–97
Karvonen A, Paukku S, Valtonen ET, Hudson PJ (2003) Transmission, infectivity and survival of Diplostomum spathaceum cercariae. Parasitology 127:217–224
Lysne DA, Skorping A (2002) The parasite Lernaeocera branchialis on caged cod: infection pattern is caused by differences in host susceptibility. Parasitology 124:69–76
Manning MJ, Nakanishi T (1996) The specific immune system: cellular defenses. In: Iwama G, Nakanishi T (eds) The fish immune system: organism, pathogen, and environment. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., pp 159–205
Marcogliese DJ, Dumont P, Gendron AD, Mailhot Y, Bergeron E, McLaughlin JD (2001) Spatial and temporal variation in abundance of Diplostomum spp. in walleye (Stizostadion vitreum) and white suckers (Catostomus commersoni) from the St. Lawrence River. Can J Zool 79:355–369
McKeown CA, Irwin SWB (1997) Accumulation of Diplostomum spp. (Digenea: Diplostomatidae) metacercariae in the eyes of 0+ and 1+ roach (Rutilus rutilus). Int J Parasitol 27:377–380
Niewiadomska K (1986) Verification of the life-cycles of Diplostomum spathaceum (Rudolphi, 1819) and D. pseudospathaceum Niewiadomska, 1984 (Trematoda, Diplostomidae). Syst Parasitol 8:23–31
Owen SF, Barber I, Hart PJB (1993) Low level infection by eye fluke, Diplostomum spp., affects the vision of three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. J Fish Biol 42:803–806
Pennycuick L (1971) Differences in the parasite infections in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) of different sex, age and size. Parasitology 63:407–418
Poulin R, Morand S (2000) Parasite body size and interspecific variation in levels of aggregation among nematodes. J Parasitol 86:642–647
Shariff M, Richards RH, Sommerville C (1980) The histopathology of acute and chronic infections of rainbow trout Salmo gairdneri Richardson with eye flukes, Diplostomum spp. J Fish Dis 3:455–465
Shaw DJ, Dobson AP (1995) Patterns of macroparasite abundance and aggregation in wildlife populations: a quantitative review. Parasitology 111:S111–S133
Shaw DJ, Grenfell BT, Dobson AP (1998) Patterns of macroparasite aggregation in wildlife host populations. Parasitology 177:597–610
Speed P, Pauley GB (1985) Feasibility of protecting rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson, by immunizing against the eye fluke, Diplostomum spathaceum. J Fish Dis 26:739–744
Stables JN, Chappell LH (1986) Putative immune response of rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri, to Diplostomum spathaceum infections. J Fish Biol 29:115–122
Sweeting RA (1974) Investigations into natural and experimental infections of freshwater fish by the common eye-fluke Diplostomum spathaceum Rud. Parasitology 69:291–300
Tanguay GV, Scott ME (1992) Factors generating aggregation of Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda) in laboratory mice. Parasitology 104:519–529
Taylor LR (1961) Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature 189:732–735
Taylor LR (1970) Aggregation and the transformation of counts of Aphis fabae Scop. on beans. Ann Appl Biol 65:181–189
Valtonen ET, Gibson DI (1997) Aspects of the biology of diplostomid metacercarial (Digenea) populations occurring in fishes in different localities in northern Finland. Ann Zool Fenn 34:47–59
Valtonen ET, Niinimaa A (1983) Dispersion and frequency distribution of Corynosoma spp. (Acanthocephala) in the fish of the Bothnian Bay. Aquilo Ser Zool 22:1–13
Valtonen ET, Holmes JC, Koskivaara M (1997) Eutrophication, pollution and fragmentation: effects on parasite communities of roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis) in four lakes in central Finland. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:572–585
Wall T, Bjerkås E (1999) A simplified method of scoring cataracts in fish. Bull Eur Assoc Fish Pathol 19:162–165
Whyte SK, Allan JC, Secombes CJ, Chappell LH (1987) Cercariae and diplostomules of Diplostomum spathaceum (Digenea) elicit an immune response in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson. J Fish Biol 31:185–190
Whyte SK, Chappell LH, Secombes CJ (1989) Cytotoxic reactions of rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson, macrophages for larvae of the eye fluke Diplostomum spathaceum (Digenea). J Fish Biol 35:333–345
Whyte SK, Chappell LH, Secombes CJ (1990) Protection of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Richardson), against Diplostomum spathaceum (Digenea): the role of specific antibody and activated macrophages. J Fish Dis 13:281–291
Wilson K, Bjørnstad ON, Dobson AP, Merler S, Poglayen G, Randolph SE, Read AF, Skorping A (2002) Heterogeneities im macroparasite Infections: Patterns and Processes. In: Hudson PJ, Rizzoli A, Grenfell BT, Heesterbeek H, Dobson AP (eds) The ecology of wildlife diseases. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 6–44
Wootten R (1974) Observations on strigeid metacercariae in the eyes of fish from Hanningfield Reservoir, Essex, England. J Helminthol 48:73–83
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Satu Paukku and all other persons who assisted in the fieldwork. Special thanks to Jouni Taskinen for roach data, Yrjö Lankinen for the fish material and Jukka Jokela for valuable discussions. Markku Julkunen and Harri Högmander gave statistical advice. The study was conducted at the Konnevesi Research Station, and was financed by Biological Interactions graduate school and the SUNARE research programme of the Academy of Finland. The experiments conducted in this study were approved by the lab-animal care and use committee of the University of Jyväskylä and comply with the laws of Finland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karvonen, A., Hudson, P.J., Seppälä, O. et al. Transmission dynamics of a trematode parasite: exposure, acquired resistance and parasite aggregation. Parasitol Res 92, 183–188 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-003-1035-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-003-1035-y