Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of species and cellular activity of oviductal epithelial cells on their dialogue with co-cultured mouse embryos

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An efficient co-culture system, especially with oviductal or uterine epithelial cells, is important not only for the production of high quality embryos, but also for the study of the molecular dialogue between embryos and their maternal environment. Although mouse embryos have been co-cultured successfully with oviductal epithelial cells (OECs) from several species, studies on the effects of species and functionality of OECs are few. Reports concerning the necessity of direct contact between the embryo and OECs and about the culture of mouse embryos in medium conditioned with heterologous OECs have been controversial. In this study, pronuclear embryos from Kunming mice, characterized by an obvious two-cell block in vitro, were co-cultured with mouse, goat, and chick OECs. The functionality of OECs was determined by analyzing the cell cycle, apoptosis, the numbers of mitochondria and cilia, and the ability both to support embryonic development and to remove hypoxanthine from the culture medium. The necessity of direct contact between OECs and embryos was studied by repeated renewal of culture medium with fresh conditioned medium, the culture of embryos in plastic wells connected by tunnels to wells with OEC monolayers, and the co-culture of embryos separated from OECs by a filter. Both goat and chick OECs supported mouse embryonic development, but their embryotrophic lifespan was shorter than that of the mouse OECs. Whereas media conditioned with mouse OECs supported mouse embryonic development satisfactorily, medium conditioned with goat OECs supported little development. Immediate dialogue between heterologous OECs and embryos was essential for efficient co-culture, whereas direct contact between the two cell types was not; neither dialogue nor contact was needed between isologous OECs and embryos. Embryotrophic activity and the ability to remove hypoxanthine from conditioned medium declined with time after confluence and number of passages of OECs, mainly because of apoptosis and dedifferentiation. Thus, the species and functionality of OECs have profound effects on their molecular dialogue with co-cultured embryos, and efficient co-culture depends upon both positive and negative conditioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bastias MC, McGee-Belser ST, Bryan SH, Vasquez JM (1993) In vitro deleterious effect of hypoxanthine in Ham’s nutrient mixture F-10 culture medium on human oocyte fertilization and early embryonic development. Fertil Steril 60:876–880

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bavister BD (1992) Co-culture for embryo development: is it really necessary? Hum Reprod 7:1339–1341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi P, Scorrano L, Colonna R, Petronilli V, Di Lisa F (1999) Mitochondria and cell death—mechanistic aspects and methodological issues. Eur J Biochem 264:687–701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chatot CL, Ziomek CA, Bavister BD, Lewis JL, Torres I (1989) An improved culture medium supports development of random-breed 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro. J Reprod Fert 86:679–688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desai N, Goldfarb J (1998) Co-cultured human embryos may be subjected to widely different microenvironments: pattern of growth factor/cytokine release by Vero cells during the co-culture interval. Hum Reprod 13:1600–1605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards LJ, Batt PA, Gandolfi F, Gardner DK (1997) Modifications made to culture medium by bovine oviduct epithelial cells: changes to carbohydrates stimulate bovine embryo development. Mol Reprod Dev 46:146–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eppig JJ, Ward-Bailey PF, Coleman DL (1985) Hypoxanthine and adenosine in murine ovarian follicular fluid: concentration and activity in maintaining oocyte meiotic arrest. Biol Reprod 33:1041–1049

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fukaya T, Chida S, Murakami T, Yajima A (1996) Is direct cell-to-cell contact needed to improve embryonic development in co-culture? Tohoku J Exp Med 180:225–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez E, Uria H (1997) Morphological and functional characterization of bovine oviductal epithelial cell monolayers cultured on polarizing membranes. Reprod Nutr Dev 37:151–162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goto Y, Noda Y, Mori T, Nakano M (1993) Increased generation of reactive oxygen species in embryos cultured in vitro. Free Radic Biol Med 15:69–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goto K, Iwai N, Ide K, Takuma Y, Nakanishi Y (1994) Viability of one-cell bovine embryos cultured in vitro: comparison of cell-free culture with co-culture. J Reprod Fertil 100:239–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hishinuma M, Takahashi Y, Kanagawa H (1989) Isolation and monolayer culture of bovine oviduct epithelial cells. Nippon Juigaku Zasshi 51:1201–1208

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan B, Costantini F, Lacy E (1986) Manipulating the mouse embryo: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi K, Kanno Y, Katayose H, Yanagida K, Suzuki R, Sato A (1994) Co-culture of mouse embryos with cryopreserved human oviduct epithelial cells. J Assist Reprod Genet 11:367–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata H, Akamatsu S, Minami N, Yamada M (1999) Allopurinol, an inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, improves the development of IVM/IVF bovine embryos (>4 cell) in vitro under certain culture conditions. Theriogenology 51:613–622

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joo BS, Kim MK, Na YJ, Moon HS, Lee KS, Kim HD (2001) The mechanism of action of co-culture on embryo development in the mouse model: direct embryo-to-cell contact and the removal of deleterious components. Fertil Steril 75:193–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi MS (1988) Isolation, cell culture and immunocytochemical characterization of oviduct epithelial cells of the cow. J Reprod Fertil 83:249–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi MS (1995) Isolation, cell culture, and characterization of oviduct epithelial cells of the cow. Microsc Res Tech 31:507–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YB, Ahn SH, Chang DY, Chung KN, Koh JW (2002) Vero cell co-culture counteracts the detrimental effects of hydrosalpinx fluid on the development of mouse embryos in vitro. J Korean Med Sci 17:217–219

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YL, Xu JS, Chan ST, Ho PC, Yeung WS (2001) Vero cells, but not oviductal cells, increase the hatching frequency and total cell count of mouse blastocysts partly by changing energy substrate concentrations in culture medium. J Assist Reprod Genet 18:566–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu LP, Chan ST, Ho PC, Yeung WS (1995) Human oviductal cells produce high molecular weight factor(s) that improves the development of mouse embryo. Hum Reprod 10:2781–2786

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu LP, Chan ST, Ho PC, Yeung WS (1998) Partial purification of embryotrophic factors from human oviductal cells. Hum Reprod 13:1613–1619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loutradis D, John D, Kiessling AA (1987) Hypoxanthine causes a 2-cell block in random-bred mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 37:311–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma S, Lan G, Miao Y, Wang Z, Chang Z, Luo M, Tan J (2003) Hypoxanthine (HX) inhibition of in vitro meiotic resumption in goat oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 66:306–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mermillod P, Vansteenbrugge A, Wils C, Mourmeaux JL, Massip A, Dessy F (1993) Characterization of the embryotrophic activity of exogenous protein-free oviduct-conditioned medium used in culture of cattle embryos. Biol Reprod 49:582–587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls D, Budd S (2000) Mitochondria and neuronal survival. Physiol Rev 80:315–360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noda Y, Narimoto K, Umaoka Y, Natsuyama S, Mori T (1993) Analysis of oviduct-derived embryonic growth stimulator activity. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 38:57–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nonogaki T, Noda Y, Narimoto K, Umaoka Y, Mori T (1992) Effects of superoxide dismutase on mouse in vitro fertilization and embryo culture system. J Assist Reprod Genet 9:274–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nureddin A, Epsaro E, Kiessling AA (1990) Purines inhibit the development of mouse embryos in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 90:455–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ouhibi N, Hamidi J, Guillaud J, Menezo Y (1990) Co-culture of 1-cell mouse embryos on different cell supports. Hum Reprod 5:737–743

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reischl J, Prelle K, Schol H, Neumuller C, Einspanier R, Sinowatz F, Wolf E (1999) Factors affecting proliferation and dedifferentiation of primary bovine oviduct epithelial cells in vitro. Cell Tissue Res 296:371–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rexroad CE Jr, Powell AM (1988) Co-culture of ovine ova with oviductal cells in medium 199. J Anim Sci 66:947–953

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger D, Loskutoff NM, Betteridge KJ (1992) Developmentally related changes in the metabolism of glucose and glutamine by cattle embryos produced and co-cultured in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 95:585–595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger D, Grisart B, Semple E, Van Langendonckt A, Betteridge KJ, Dessy F (1995) Comparison of the effects of oviductal cell co-culture and oviductal cell-conditioned medium on the development and metabolic activity of cattle embryos. J Reprod Fertil 105:91–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rizos D, Ward F, Boland MP, Lonergan P (2001) Effect of culture system on the yield and quality of bovine blastocysts as assessed by survival after vitrification. Theriogenology 56:1–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakkas D, Trounson AO (1991) Formulation of a complex serum-free medium (CSM) for use in the co-culture of mouse embryos with cells of the female reproductive tract. Reprod Fertil Dev 3:99–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakkas D, Trounson AO, Kola I (1989) In vivo cleavage rates and viability obtained for early cleavage mouse embryos in co-culture with oviduct cells. Reprod Fertil Dev 1:127–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seaver SS, Bosch J van der, Sato G (1984) The chick oviduct in tissue culture. I. Initial characterization of growing primary oviduct tissue cultures. Exp Cell Res 155:241–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi Y, Hishinuma M, Matsui M, Tanaka H, Kanagawa H (1996) Development of in vitro matured/fertilized bovine embryos in a chemically defined medium: influence of oxygen concentration in the gas atmosphere. J Vet Med Sci 58:897–902

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi K, Nagata Y, Sandow BA, Hodgen GD (1992) Primary culture of human fallopian tube epithelial cells and co-culture of early mouse pre-embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 32:236–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toescu EC, Verkhratsky A (2000) Assessment of mitochondrial polarization status in living cells based on analysis of the spatial heterogeneity of rhodamine 123 fluorescence staining. Pflugers Arch 440:941–947

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Langendonckt A, Vansteenbrugge A, Dessy-Doize C, Flechon JE, Charpigny G, Mermillod P, Massip A, Dessy F (1995) Characterization of bovine oviduct epithelial cell monolayers cultured under serum-free conditions in vitro. Cell Dev Biol Anim 31:664–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter I (1995) Culture of bovine oviduct epithelial cells (BOEC). Anat Rec 243:347–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson AJ, Watson PH, Warnes D, Walker SK, Armstrong DT, Seamark RF (1994) Preimplantation development of in vitro-matured and in vitro-fertilized ovine zygotes: comparison between coculture on oviduct epithelial cell monolayers and culture under low oxygen atmosphere. Biol Reprod 50:715–724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf E, Arnold GJ, Bauersachs S, Beier HM, Blum H, Einspanier R, Frohlich T, Herrler A, Hiendleder S, Kolle S, Prelle K, Reichenbach HD, Stojkovic M, Wenigerkind H, Sinowatz F (2003) Embryo-maternal communication in bovine—strategies for deciphering a complex cross-talk. Reprod Domest Anim 38:276–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu YS, Sun XS, Jiang HN, Han Y, Zhao CB, Tan JH (2003) Studies of the cell cycle of in vitro cultured skin fibroblasts in goats: work in progress. Theriogenology 59:1277–1289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Y, Pan SP, Zhang CX, Cao ZW (1996) Influences of primary and subcultured human oviductal epithelial cells on development of mouse one-cell embryos. Chinese J Jinan University Transaction 5:162–165

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Many thanks are due to Dr. Sarah Seidel at the International Embryo Transfer Society for critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing-He Tan.

Additional information

This study was supported by grants from the China National Natural Science Foundation (nos. 30430530 and 30571337) and the “973” Project of the Chinese Science and Technology Ministry (no. G200016108).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, XW., Ma, SF., Yu, JN. et al. Effects of species and cellular activity of oviductal epithelial cells on their dialogue with co-cultured mouse embryos. Cell Tissue Res 327, 55–66 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-006-0236-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-006-0236-y

Keywords

Navigation