Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of swimming demand on phenotypic plasticity and morphological integration: a comparison of two polymorphic charr species

  • Population Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In northern freshwater lakes, several fish species have populations composed of discrete morphs, usually involving a divergence between benthic and limnetic morphs. Although it has been suggested that swimming demand plays an important role in morphological differentiation, thus influencing habitat selection, it is unclear how it affects reaction norms, patterns in character correlation, and levels of morphological integration. We examined whether swimming demand could induce morphological plasticity in the directions expected under divergent habitat selection, and evaluated its influence on the morphological integration in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) and brook charr (S. fontinalis), two congeneric species exhibiting conspicuous and subtle resource polymorphism, respectively. We found that changes in morphology were induced by differential swimming demands in both species. The length of the pectoral fin was the character that responded most strongly according to the predicted morphological expectations under divergent habitat selection. High levels of morphological plasticity, relatively low levels of integration, and differences found in the morphological correlation structure among water velocity treatments suggest that constraints on morphological change are unlikely in either species, thus allowing great potential for phenotypic flexibility in both species. The magnitude of character integration, however, was larger for Arctic charr than for brook charr. This latter result is discussed in the light of the differences in the level of polymorphism between the two species in the wild. The results of the present study indicate that swimming demand alone may not be sufficient to generate the polymorphism encountered in nature. Given that both diet and swimming demands can induce morphological changes, it would be important to conduct experiments targeting the interaction between the morphological modules related to trophic and swimming demands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3a, b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams CE, Woltering C, Alexander G (2003) Epigenetic regulation of trophic morphology through feeding behaviour in Arctic char, Salvelinus alpinus. Biol J Linn Soc 78:43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitchinson J (1986) The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman and Hall, New York

  • Andersson J (2003) Effects of diet-induced resource polymorphism on performance in Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus). Evol Ecol Res 5:213–228

    Google Scholar 

  • APHA (American Public Health Association), American Water Work Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation (1989) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th edn. APHA Press, Washington

  • Armbruster WS, Di Stilio VS, Tuxill JD, Flores TC, Runk JLV (1999) Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine neotropical plants: A re-evaluation of Berg’s correlation-pleiades concept. Am J Bot 86:39–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Badyaev AV, Foresman KR (2000) Extreme environmental change and evolution: stress-induced morphological variation is strongly concordant with patterns of evolutionary divergence in shrew mandibles. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:371–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg RL (1960) The ecological significance of correlation pleiades. Evolution 14:171–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke P, Magnan P, Rodriguez MA (1997) Individual variations in habitat use and morphology in brook charr. J Fish Biol 51:783–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke P, Magnan P, Rodríguez, MA (1999) Phenotypic responses of lacustrine brook charr in relation to the intensity of interspecific competition. Evol Ecol 13:19-31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheverud JM (1995) Morphological integration in the saddle-back tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis) cranium. Am Nat 145:63–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheverud JM, Wagner GP, Dow MM (1989) Methods for the comparative-analysis of variation patterns. Syst Zool 38:201–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Day T, Pritchard J, Schluter D (1994) A comparison of two sticklebacks. Evolution 48:1723–1734

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1970) Genetics of the evolutionary process, 1st edn. Columbia University Press, New York

  • Drucker EG, Lauder G (2003) Function of pectoral fins in rainbow trout: behavioral repertoire and hydrodynamic forces. J Exp Biol 206:813–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dynes J, Magnan P, Bernatchez L, Rodriguez MA (1999) Genetic and morphological variation between two forms of lacustrine brook char. J Fish Biol 54:955–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East P, Magnan P (1987) The effect of locomotor activity on the growth of brook char, Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill. Can J Zool 65:843–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York

  • Fleming IA, Jonsson B, Gross MR (1994) Phenotypic divergence of sea-ranched, farmed, and wild salmon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 51: 2808–2824

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM, Cerda X, Garcia MB, Guitian J, Medrano M, Rey PJ, Sanchez-Lafuente AM (2002) Floral integration, phenotypic covariance structure and pollinator variation in bumblebee-pollinated Helleborus foetidus. J Evol Biol 15:108–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imre I, McLaughlin RL, Noakes DLG (2002) Phenotypic plasticity in brook char: changes in caudal fin induced by water flow. J Fish Biol 61:1171–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson B, Jonsson N (2001) Polymorphism and speciation in Arctic char. J Fish Biol 58:605–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawata M (2002) Invasion of vacant and subsequent sympatric speciation. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:55–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1978) Adaptation. Sci Am 239:213–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling EN, Cotter D (2003) Statistical power in comparative aquaculture studies. Aquaculture 224:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin RL (2001) Behavioural diversification in brook char: adaptive responses to local conditions. J Anim Ecol 70:325–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mërila J, Bjorklund M (1999) Population divergence and morphometric integration in the greenfinch (Carduelis chloris)—evolution against the trajectory of least resistance? J Evol Biol 12:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministère de l’agriculture, des pêcheries et de l’alimentation Québec (1990) Atelier de travail sur la génétique des salmonidés d’élevage au Québec, cahier de conférences. Gouvernement du Québec, Québec

  • Moran MD (2003) Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos100:403–405

  • Olden JD, Jackson DA, Peres-Neto PR (2002) Predictive models for fish species distributions: a note on proper validation and chance predictions. Trans Am Fish Soc 131:329–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakkasmaa S, Piironen J (2001) Water velocity shapes salmonids. Evol Ecol 14:721–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peres-Neto PR (1999) How many statistical tests are too many? The problem of conducting multiple inferences revisited. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 176:303–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres-Neto PR, Jackson DA, Somers KM (2003) Giving meaningful interpretation to ordination axes: assessing loading significance in principal component analysis. Ecology 84:2347–2363

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M, Cammell K, Schmitt J (1999) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: a comparative approach in the phylogenetic neighbourhood of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Evol Biol 12:779–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proulx R, Magnan P (2002) Physiological performance of two forms of lacustrine brook char, Salvelinus fontinalis, in the open-water habitat. Environ Biol Fish 64:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reist JD (1986) An empirical-evaluation of coefficients used in residual and allometric adjustment of size covariation. Can J Zool 64:1363–1368

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson BW, Parsons KJ (2002) Changing times, spaces, and faces: tests and implications of adaptive morphologicl plasticity in the fishes of northern postglacial lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1819–1833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting, CD (1989) Phenotypic integration and environmental change. BioScience 39:460–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Schluter D (1996) Ecological speciation in postglacial fishes. Phylos Trans R Soc Lond B 351:807–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Skúlason S, Smith TB (1995) Resource polymorphism in vertebrates. Trends Environ Ecol 10:366–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skúlason S, Noakes DLG, Snorrason SS (1989) Ontogeny of trophic morphology of four sympatric morphs of Arctic char Salvelinus alpinus in Thingvallavatn, Iceland. Biol J Linn Soc 38:281–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1989) The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity. BioScience 39:436–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor EB, McPhail JD (1985) Variation in body morphology among British Columbia populations of coho salmon, Onchorhynchus kisutch. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:2020–2028

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington CH (1953) Genetic assimilation of an acquired character. Evolution 7:118–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP (1984) On the eigenvalue distribution of genetic and phenotypic dispersion matrices—evidence for a nonrandom organization of quantitative character variation. J Math Biol 21:77–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Waitt DE, Levin DA (1993) Phenotypic integration and plastic correlations in phlox-drummondii (polemoniaceae). Am J Bot 80:1224–1233

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb PW (1982) Locomotor patterns in the evolution of the actinoptherygian fishes. Am Zool 22:329–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb PW (1984) Body form, locomotion and foraging in aquatic invertebrates. Am Zool 24:107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Westrich KM, Konkola NR, Matsuokab MP, Phillips RB (2002) Interspecific relationships among charrs based on phylogenetic analysis of nuclear growth hormone intron sequences. Environ Biol Fish 64:217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte F, Barel CDN, Hoogerhoud RJC (1990) Phenotypic plasticity of anatomical structures and its ecomorphological significance. Neth J Zool 40:278–298

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jens Andersson, Steven Kohler, and an anonymous reviewer for providing valuable comments on our manuscript. We thank Sophia Balcomb and Craig Osenberg for editorial comments. We thank Pierre East for his invaluable assistance in designing and running the laboratory experiments, and Steve Garçeau for morphological measurements. Raphaël Proulx gave helpful comments at different stages of the present study. The laboratory work was supported by a grant from le Fonds pour la formation des chercheurs et d’aide à la recherche (FCAR) and la Société de recherche et de développement en aquiculture continentale (SORDAC) (Action concertée FCAR-SORDAC program) to P. Magnan. The analytical work was supported by the Canada Research Chair program to P. Magnan. P.R. Peres-Neto was supported by a Postdoctoral fellowship from the Canada Research Chair in Freshwater Ecology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro R. Peres-Neto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peres-Neto, P.R., Magnan, P. The influence of swimming demand on phenotypic plasticity and morphological integration: a comparison of two polymorphic charr species. Oecologia 140, 36–45 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1562-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1562-y

Keywords

Navigation