Skip to main content
Log in

Occurrence of dead core in catalytic particles containing immobilized enzymes: analysis for the Michaelis–Menten kinetics and assessment of numerical methods

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, the occurrence of dead core in catalytic particles containing immobilized enzymes is analyzed for the Michaelis–Menten kinetics. An assessment of numerical methods is performed to solve the boundary value problem generated by the mathematical modeling of diffusion and reaction processes under steady state and isothermal conditions. Two classes of numerical methods were employed: shooting and collocation. The shooting method used the ode function from Scilab software. The collocation methods included: that implemented by the bvode function of Scilab, the orthogonal collocation, and the orthogonal collocation on finite elements. The methods were validated for simplified forms of the Michaelis–Menten equation (zero-order and first-order kinetics), for which analytical solutions are available. Among the methods covered in this article, the orthogonal collocation on finite elements proved to be the most robust and efficient method to solve the boundary value problem concerning Michaelis–Menten kinetics. For this enzyme kinetics, it was found that the dead core can occur when verified certain conditions of diffusion–reaction within the catalytic particle. The application of the concepts and methods presented in this study will allow for a more generalized analysis and more accurate designs of heterogeneous enzymatic reactors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Šekuljica NŽ, Prlainović NŽ, Jovanović JR, Stefanović AB, Djokić VR, Dušan ŽM, Knežević-Jugović ZD (2016) Immobilization of horseradish peroxidase onto kaolin. Bioproc Biosyst Eng. doi:10.1007/s00449-015-1529-x

    Google Scholar 

  2. Edet E, Ntekpe M, Omereji S (2013) Current trend in enzyme immobilization: a review. Int J Mod Biochem 2:31–49

    Google Scholar 

  3. Illanes A (2008) Enzyme biocatalysis: principles and applications. Springer, Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey JE, Ollis DF (1986) Biochemical engineering fundamentals. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doran PM (2013) Bioprocess engineering principles. Academic Press, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fogler HS (2005) Elements of chemical reaction engineering. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oliveira SC (1999) Evaluation of effectiveness factor for immobilized enzymes using Runge–Kutta–Gill method: how to solve mathematical undetermination at particle center point? Bioproc Eng. doi:10.1007/s004490050579

    Google Scholar 

  8. Granato MA, Queiroz LC (2003) Dead core in porous catalysts: modeling and simulation of a case problem using Mathematica. In: Proceedings of the workshop modelling and simulation in chemical engineering, CIM–Centro Internacional de Matemática, Coimbra, 30 June–4 July 2003

  9. Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN (2002) Transport phenomena. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Froment GF, Bischoff KB, De Wilde J (2011) Chemical reactor analysis and design. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mahalakshmi M, Hariharan G (2016) An efficient Chebyshev wavelet based analytical algorithm to steady state reaction–diffusion models arising in mathematical chemistry. J Math Chem. doi:10.1007/s10910-015-0560-0

    Google Scholar 

  12. Devi MR, Sevukaperumal S, Rajendran L (2015) Non-linear reaction diffusion equation with Michaelis–Menten kinetics and Adomian decomposition method. Appl Math. doi:10.5923/j.am.20150501.04

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shanthi D, Ananthaswamy V, Rajendran L (2013) Analysis of non-linear reaction-diffusion processes with Michaelis–Menten kinetics by a new Homotopy perturbation method. Nat Sci. doi:10.4236/ns.2013.59128

    Google Scholar 

  14. Joy RA, Meena A, Loghambal S, Rajendran L (2011) A two-parameter mathematical model for immobilized enzymes and Homotopy analysis method. Nat Sci. doi:10.4236/ns.2011.37078

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hindmarsh AC (1983) In: Stepleman RS et al (eds) Scientific computing. IMACS Transactions on Scientific Computation, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brown PN, Hindmarsh AC (1989) Reduced storage matrix methods in stiff ODE systems. Appl Math Comput. doi:10.1016/0096-3003(89)90110-0

    Google Scholar 

  17. Description and use of LSODE, the Livermore solver for ordinary differential equations (1993) NASA, Livermore. https://computation.llnl.gov/casc/nsde/pubs/u113855.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2016

  18. Shampine LF (1996) Some practical Runge–Kutta formulas. Math Comput. doi:10.2307/2008219

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shampine LF, Watts HA (1980) DEPAC–design of a user oriented package of ODE solvers. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fehlberg E (1970) Klassische Runge–Kutta-Formeln vierter und niedrigerer Ordnung mit Schrittweiten-Kontrolle und ihre Anwendung auf Wärmeleitungs probleme. Computing. doi:10.1007/BF02241732

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ascher U, Christiansen J, Russell RD (1981) Collocation software for boundary-value ODEs. ACM T Math Softw. doi:10.1145/355945.355950

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bader G, Ascher U (1987) A new basis implementation for a mixed order boundary value ode solver. SIAM J Sci Stat Comp. doi:10.1137/0908047

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ascher U, Christiansen J, Russell RD (1979) A collocation solver for mixed order systems of boundary value problems. Math Comput. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1979-0521281-7

    Google Scholar 

  24. Deboor C, Weiss R (1980) SOLVEBLOK: a package for solving almost block diagonal linear systems. ACM T Math Softw. doi:10.1145/355873.355880

    Google Scholar 

  25. Villadsen J, Michelsen ML (1978) Solution of differential equation models by polynomial approximation. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wylie CR, Barret LC (1982) In: Wylie CR, Barret LC (eds) Advanced engineering mathematics. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Conceição Oliveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pereira, F.M., Oliveira, S.C. Occurrence of dead core in catalytic particles containing immobilized enzymes: analysis for the Michaelis–Menten kinetics and assessment of numerical methods. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 39, 1717–1727 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1647-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1647-0

Keywords

Navigation