Abstract
Background
Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy can be expected in a variable percentage of surgeries. Patients who experience conversion to a laparotomy may have a worse outcome than those who have a successfully completed laparoscopic procedure. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of converted cases based on whether the case was a reactive conversion (RC, due to an intraoperative complication such as bleeding or bowel injury) or a preemptive conversion (PC, due to a lack of progression or unclear anatomy).
Methods
All laparoscopic colorectal procedures converted to a laparotomy were retrospectively reviewed from data prospectively entered into an institutional review board–approved database. Patients who underwent an RC were matched with patients who underwent a PC according to age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and diagnosis. Patients who underwent a laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR) were taken as the control group. The incidence and nature of postoperative complications, the time to liquid or regular diet, and the length of hospital stay were recorded.
Results
Of 962 laparoscopic procedures performed between 2000 and 2007, 222 (23.1%) converted to a laparotomy were identified. The 30 patients who had undergone an RC were matched with 60 patients who had undergone a PC and 60 patients who had undergone an LCR. The reasons for RC were bleeding in 14 cases, bowel injury in 6 cases, ureteric damage in 3 cases, splenic injury in 3 cases, and other complications in 4 cases. The patients who had undergone RC were more likely to have experienced a postoperative complication (50% vs 27%; p = 0.028), required longer time to toleration of a regular diet (6 vs 5 days; p = 0.03), and stayed longer in the hospital (8.1 vs 7.1 days; p = 0.080).
Conclusion
Preemptive conversion is associated with a better outcome than reactive conversion. Based on this finding, it appears preferable for the surgeon to have a low threshold for performing PC rather than awaiting the need for an RC.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hildebrandt U, Kessler K, Plusczyk T, Pistorius G, Vollmar B, Menger MD (2003) Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections. Surg Endosc 17:242–246
Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, Kitajima M (2003) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 17:636–640
Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P, Dellabona P, Di Carlo V (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236:759–767
Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP, Dissanaike S, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2002) Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences. Dis Colon Rectum 45:485–490
Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S, Chau WY, Tootla A, Tootla F, Silva YJ (2002) Laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1309–1315
Lacy A, García-Valdecasas J, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué J, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for the treatment of nonmetastatid colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229
Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch H-P, Köhler L, Bärlehner E, Köckerling F, the Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG) (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:207–216
Gervaz P, Pikarsky A, Utech M, Secic M, Efron J, Belin B, Jain A, Wexner S (2001) Converted laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 15:827–832
Schwandner O, Schiedeck T, Bruch HP (1999) The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do predictive factors exist? Surg Endosc 13:151–156
Pandya S, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Rusin LC (1999) Laparoscopic colectomy: indications for conversions for conversion to laparotomy. Arch Surg 134:471–475
Wexner SD (1997) Definitions of conversion—reactive vs preemptive. Presented at the 8th Annual International Colorectal Disease Symposium, hosted by the Cleveland Clinic Florida, Fort Lauderdale, FL in February
Agachan F, Joo JS, Sher M, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (1997) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do we get faster? Surg Endosc 11:331–335
Eijsbouts QAJ, Cuesta MA, de Brauw LM, Sietses C (1997) Elective laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid resection for diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 11:750–753
Falk PM, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD, Thorson AG, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Johansen OB, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr (1993) Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 36:28–34
Hoffman GC, Baker JW, Fitchett CW, Vansant JH (1994) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy: initial experience. Ann Surg 219:732–743
Andersson A, Bergdahl L (1976) Urologic complications following abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. Arch Surg 111:969–971
Holzman MD, Eubanks WS (1997) Laparoscopic colectomy: prospects and problems. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 7:525–539
Slim K, Pezet D, Riff Y, Clark E, Chipponi J (1995) High morbidity rate after converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 82:1406–1408
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, C., Wexner, S.D., Safar, B. et al. Conversion in laparoscopic surgery: does intraoperative complication influence outcome?. Surg Endosc 23, 2454–2458 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0414-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0414-6