Abstract
Importance
Robotic colorectal resection continues to gain in popularity. However, limited data are available regarding how surgeons gain competency and institutions develop programs.
Objective
To determine the number of cases required for establishing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program.
Design
Retrospective review.
Setting
Cancer center.
Patients
We reviewed 418 robotic-assisted resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2014, by surgeons at a single institution. The individual surgeon’s and institutional learning curve were examined. The earliest adopter, Surgeon 1, had the highest volume. Surgeons 2–4 were later adopters. Surgeon 5 joined the group with robotic experience.
Interventions
A cumulative summation technique (CUSUM) was used to construct learning curves and define the number of cases required for the initial learning phase. Perioperative variables were analyzed across learning phases.
Main outcome measure
Case numbers for each stage of the learning curve.
Results
The earliest adopter, Surgeon 1, performed 203 cases. CUSUM analysis of surgeons’ experience defined three learning phases, the first requiring 74 cases. Later adopters required 23–30 cases for their initial learning phase. For Surgeon 1, operative time decreased from 250 to 213.6 min from phase 1–3 (P = 0.008), with no significant changes in intraoperative complication or leak rate. For Surgeons 2–4, operative time decreased from 418 to 361.9 min across the two phases (P = 0.004). Their intraoperative complication rate decreased from 7.8 to 0 % (P = 0.03); the leak rate was not significantly different (9.1 vs. 1.5 %, P = 0.07), though it may be underpowered given the small number of events.
Conclusions
Our data suggest that establishing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program requires approximately 75 cases. Once a program is well established, the learning curve is shorter and surgeons require fewer cases (25–30) to reach proficiency. These data suggest that the institutional learning curve extends beyond a single surgeon’s learning experience.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewki A, Ballantyne GH (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45(12):1689–1694
Pigazzi A, Elllenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20(10):1521–1525
Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239(1):14–21
Pai A, Melich G, Marecik SJ, Park JJ, Prasad LM (2015) Current status of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a bird’s eye view. J Minim Access Surg 11(1):29–34
Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A et al (2009) The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 23(2):438–443
Barrie J, Jayne DG, Wright J, Murray CJ, Collinson FJ, Pavitt SH (2014) Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systemic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 21(3):829–840
Hellan M, Stein H, Pigazzi A (2009) Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc 23(2):447–451
Park YA, Kim JM, Kim SA et al (2010) Totally robotic surgery for rectal cancer: from splenic flexure to pelvic floor in one step. Surg Endosc 24(3):715–720
Kim SH, Kwak JM (2013) Robotic total mesorectal excision: operative technique and review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol 17(1):S47–S53
Peterson CY, Weiser MR (2014) Robotic colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 18(2):398–403
Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Raqupathi M, Haas EM (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25(3):855–860
Yap CH, Colson ME, Watters DA (2007) Cumulative sum techniques for surgeons: a brief review. ANZ J Surg 77(7):583–586
Bolsin S, Colson M (2000) The use of the Cusum technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care 12(5):433–438
Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A et al (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1614–1620
D’Annibale A, Peraazza G, Monsellato I et al (2013) Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27(6):1887–1895
Tam MS, Kaoutzanis C, Mullard AJ et al (2016) A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30(2):455–463
Yoo BE, Cho JS, Shin JW et al (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 22(4):1219–1225
Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16(6):1480–1487
Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2011) S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25(1):240–248
Jimenez-Rodriguez RM, Diaz-Pavon JM, de la Portilla de Juan F, Prendes-Sillero E, Dussort HC, Padillo J (2013) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 28(6):815–821
Sng KK, Hara M, Shin JW, Yoo BE, Yang KS, Kim SH (2013) The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27(9):3297–3307
Melich G, Hong YK, Kim J et al (2015) Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves. Surg Endosc 29(3):558–568
Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY (2014) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons from a single surgeon’s experience. Dis Colon Rectum 57(9):1066–1074
Park EJ, Kim CW, Cho MS et al (2014) Is the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection shorter then laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer?: a comparative analysis of clinicopathologic outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries. Medicine 93(25):e109
Lebeau T, Roupret M, Ferhi K et al (2012) The role of a well-trained team on the early learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures: the example of radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robot 8(1):67–72
Li JC, Lo AW, Hon SS, Ng SS, Lee JF, Leung KL (2012) Institution learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy—a multi-dimensional analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(4):527–533
Mak TW, Lee JF, Futaba K, Hon SS, Ngo DK, Ng SS (2014) Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a systemic review of current practice. World J Gastrointest Oncol 6(6):184–193
Funding
This study was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Support Grant P30 CA008748.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Hamza Guend, Maria Widmar, Sunil Patel, Garrett M. Nash, Philip B. Paty, MD, José G. Guillem, Larissa K. Temple, Julio Garcia-Aguilar and Martin R. Weiser have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guend, H., Widmar, M., Patel, S. et al. Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves. Surg Endosc 31, 2820–2828 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5292-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5292-0