Skip to main content
Log in

Peritoneal adhesions to prosthetic materials

Choice of mesh for incisional hernia repair

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In many cases, incisional hernia repair requires the use of prosthetic materials. The aim of this experimental study in a rat model was to assess the role of polyglactin 910 mesh and fluoropassivated polyester mesh in preventing the formation of adhesions.

Methods

In the first experiment, the formation of peritoneal adhesions was assessed after insertion of polypropylene, polypropylene combined with polyglactin 910, or no mesh. In the second experiment, adhesion formations were compared after insertion of fluoropassivated polyester, polypropylene, and no mesh.

Results

The first experiment showed no significant difference in adhesion formations between the polypropylene mesh and the combined mesh; however, when no mesh was used, there were significantly fewer adhesions in both experiments (p<0.01). The second experiment showed a significantly lower degree of adhesions and a lower Adhesion Index after insertion of fluoropassivated polyester mesh than when polypropylene mesh was used (p=0.04).

Conclusions

Adding polyglactin 910 mesh to polypropylene mesh to prevent the formation of adhesions is not an effective measure. Fluoropassivated polyester meshes appear to provide a better alternative to the use of polypropylene meshes for incisional hernia repair in humans in terms of the formation of adhesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. George CD, Ellis H (1986) The results of incisional hernia repair: a twelve-year review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 68: 185–187

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hesselink VJ, Luijendijk RW, de Wilt JH, Heide R, Jeekel J (1993) An evaluation of risk factors in incisional hernia recurrence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176: 228–234

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jenkins SD, Klamer TW, Parteka JJ, Condon RE (1983) A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects. Surgery 94: 392–398

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelso K, Blackett B (1977) Bacterial adherence to Prolene (Ethicon), Fluorosoft and Fluoromesh (Sulzer Vascutek). A product-comparison study on file at Sulzer Vascutek.

  5. Langer S, Christiansen J (1985) Long-term results after incisional hernia repair. Acta Chir Scand 151: 217–219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, Reed WP (1998) Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg 133: 378–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Manninen MJ, Lavonius M, Perhoniemi VJ (1991) Results of incisional hernia repair; a retrospective study of 172 unselected hernioplasties. Eur J Surg 157: 29–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Molloy RG, Moran KT, Waldron RP, Brady MP, Kirwan WO (1991) Massive incisional hernia: abdominal wall replacement with Marlex® mesh. Br J Surg 78: 242–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mudge M, Hughes LE (1985) Incisional hernia: a 10-year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 72: 70–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Soares BM, Guidoin RG, Marois Y, Martin L, King MW, Laroche G, Zhang Z, Charara J, Girard JF (1996) In vivo characterisation of a fluoropassivated gelatin-impregnated polyester mesh for incisional hernia repair. J Biomed Mat Res 32: 293–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson JN, Whawell SA (1965) Pathogenesis and prevention of adhesion formation. Br J Surg 52: 471–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Turkcapar AG, Yerdel MA, Aydinuraz K, Bayar S, Kuterdem E (1998) Repair of midline incisional hernias using polypropylene grafts. Surg Today 28: 59–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Van den Tol MP, Van Stijn I, Bonthuis F, Marquet RL, Jeekel J (1997) Reduction of intraperitoneal adhesion formation by use of nonabrasive gauze. Br J Surg 84: 1410–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zühlke HV, Lorenz EMP, Straub EM, Savvas V (1990) Pathophysiologie und Klassifikation von Adhäsionen. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir 345: 1009–1016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Online publication: 22 August 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vrijland, W.W., Bonthuis, F., Steyerberg, E.W. et al. Peritoneal adhesions to prosthetic materials. Surg Endosc 14, 960–963 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000180

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000180

Key words

Navigation