Skip to main content
Log in

Finite cover method for progressive failure with cohesive zone fracture in heterogeneous solids and structures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The finite cover method (FCM), which is a cover-based generalized finite element method, is extended for analyses of progressive failure processes involving cohesive zone fracture, starting from an interface debonding and evolving toward one of the constituents of heterogeneous solids and structures. Assuming that the constituents fail according to the maximum principal stress, we are able to represent the evolution of the resulting failure surfaces of discontinuity independent of mesh alignment owing to the distinctive features of the FCM. Also, interface elements with Lagrange multipliers are introduced to impose compatibility conditions on the material interface so that debonding is judged by the multipliers. Representative numerical examples demonstrate the capability of the proposed method in tracing the smooth transition of crack paths from interfacial to internal failure, and vice versa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Broberg KB (1999) Cracks and fractures. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Borst R (2001) Some recent issues in computational failure mechanics. Int J Numer Meth Eng 52:63–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillerborg A, Modeer M, Petersson PE (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement Concrete Res 6:773–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi GH (1991) Manifold method of material analysis. Transactions of the nineth army conference on applied mathematics and computing, Report no. 92–1, US Army Research Office

  • Melenk JM, Babuška I (1996) The partition of unity finite element method: basic theory and applications. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 29:289–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Meth Eng 46:131–150

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Terada K, Asai M, Yamagishi M (2003) Finite cover method for linear and nonlinear analyses of heterogeneous solids. Int J Numer Meth Eng 58:1321–1346

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP, Planas J (1998) Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasi-brittle materials. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • de Borst R, Gutiérrez MA, Wells GN, Remmers JJC, Askes H (2004) Cohesive-zone models, higher-order continuum theories and reliability methods for computational failure analysis. Int J Numer Meth Eng 60:289–315

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wells GN, Sluys LJ (2001) A new method for modeling cohesive cracks using finite elements. Int J Numer Meth Eng 50:2667–2682

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moës N, Belytschko T (2002) Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth. Eng Frac Mech 69:813–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariani S, Perego U (2003) Extended finite element method for quasi-brittle fracture. Int J Numer Meth Eng 58:103–126

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Secchi S, Simoni L, Schrefler BA (2004) Cohesive fracture growth in a thermoelastic bimaterial medium. Cumput Struct 82:1875–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasser TC, Holzapfel GA (2005) Modeling 3D crack propagation in unreinforced concrete using PUFEM. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 194:2859–2896

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mergheim J, Kuhl E, Steinmann P (2005) A finite element method for the computational modelling of cohesive cracks. Int J Numer Meth Eng 63:276–289

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Białas M, Mróz Z (2005) Modelling of progressive interface failure under combined normal compression and shear stress. Int J Solids Struct 42:4436–4467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells GN, de Borst R, Sluys LJ (2002) A consistent geometrically non-linear approach for delamination. Int J Numer Meth Eng 54:1333–1355

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sukumar N, Huang ZY, Prévost JH, Suo Z (2004) Partition of unity enrichment for bimaterial interface cracks. Int J Numer Meth Eng 59:1075–1102

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kurumatani M, Terada K (2005) Finite cover method with mortar elements for elastoplasticity problems. Comput Mech 36:45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babuška I (1976) The finite element method with Lagrange multipliers. Numer Math 20:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terada K, Kurumatani M (2004) Performance assessment of generalized elements in the finite cover method. Finite Elem Anal Des 41:111–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simo JC, Laursen TA (1992) An augmented Lagrangian treatment of contact problems involving friction. Comput Struct 42:97–116

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buyukozturk O, Hearing B (1998) Crack propagation in concrete composites influenced by interface fracture parameters. Int J Solids Struct 35:4055–4066

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Terada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terada, K., Ishii, T., Kyoya, T. et al. Finite cover method for progressive failure with cohesive zone fracture in heterogeneous solids and structures. Comput Mech 39, 191–210 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-005-0017-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-005-0017-6

Keywords

Navigation