Skip to main content
Log in

A Grid-based integral approach for quasilinear problems

  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For non-homogeneous and nonlinear problems, a major difficulty in applying the Boundary Element Method is the treatment of the volume integrals that arise. A recent proposed method, the grid-based integration method (GIM), uses a 3-D uniform grid to reduce the complexity of volume discretization, i.e., the discretization of the whole domain is avoided. The same grid is also used to accelerate both surface and volume integration. The efficiency of the GIM has been demonstrated on 3-D Poisson problems. In this paper, we report our work on the extension of this technique to quasilinear problems. Numerical results of a 3-D Helmholtz problem and a quasilinear Laplace problem on a multiply-connected domain with Dirichlet boundary conditions are presented. These results are compared with analytic solutions. The performance of the GIM is measured by plotting the L2-norm error as a function of the overall CPU time and is compared with the auxiliary domain method in the Helmholtz problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed S, PK Banerjee (1986) Free vibration analysis of BEM using particular integrals. J Engi. Mech. 112:682–695

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ding J, Ye W, Gray L (2005) An accelerated surface discretization based BEM approach for non-homogeneous linear problems in 3-D Complex Domains. Int J Numer Meth Eng 63 (12): 1775–1795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gao XW (2002) The radial integration methods for evaluation of domain integrals with boundary-only discretization. Engi. Anal Bound Ele, 26:905–916

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gao XW (2003) Boundary element analysis in thermoelasticity with and without Internal Cells. Int J Numer Meth Eng 57(7):975–990

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gao XW, TG Davies (2002) Boundary element programming in mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  6. Gao XW (2005) Evaluation of regular and singular domain integrals with boundary-only discetization - theory and Fortran code, J Comput Appl Math 175(2):265–290

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg MA, Chen CS, Bowman H, Power H (1998) Some comments on the use of radial basis functions in the dual reciprocity method. Comput Mech 21(2):141–148

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Herry D, Banerjee PK (1988) A New boundary element formulation for two- and three-dimensional thermoelasticity using particular Integrals. Int J Numer Meth Eng 26:2061–2077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsiao SC, Mammoli AA, Ingber MS (2003) The evaluation of domain Integrals in complex multiply-connected three-dimensional geometries for boundary element methods. Comput Mech 32:226–233

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ingber MS (1987) An efficient boundary element method for a class of parabolic differential equations using discretization in time. Numer Meth Part D Eq 3(3):187–197

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ingber MS, Phan-Thien N (1992) A Boundary element approach for parabolic differential equations using a Class of Particular Solutions. Appl Math Model 16(3):124–132

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Ingber MS (1994) A Triple reciprocity boundary element method for transient heat conduction analysis, Int Conference on Boundary Ele Technol pp 41–49

  13. Ingber MS, Mammoli A, Brown M (2001) A Comparison of domain integral evaluation techniques for boundary element methods. Int J Numer Meth Eng 52(4):417–432

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Katsikadelis JT, Nerantzaki MS (1999) The boundary element methods for nonlinear problems. Eng Anal Boun Ele 23:365–373

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mammoli AA (2002) Solution of Non-Linear integral equations in complex geometries with auxiliary integral subtraction. Int J Numer Meth Eng 55:1115–1128

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Master N, Ye W (2004) Fast BEM solution for coupled 3D electrostatic and linear elastic problems,'' Eng Anal Bound Ele 28(9):1175–1186

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nardini D, Brebbia CA (1983) A New approach to free vibration analysis using boundary elements. Appl Mathe Model 7(3):157–162

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Nowak AJ, Brebbia CA (1989) The multiple-reciprocity method. A new approach for transforming BEM domain integrals to the boundary. Eng Anal Bound Ele 6(3):164–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Partridge PW, Brebbia CA, Wrobel LC (1992) The Dual Reciprocity Bound Ele Meth Elsevier, London

  20. Phillips JR, White J (1997) A Precorrected-FFT Method for Electrostatic Analysis of Complicated 3-D Structures. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and System, 16(10):1059–1072

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang JJ, Afagh FF and Tan CL (1996) Boundary integral transformation of body-force volume integral in BEM for 2d Anisotropic elasticity. Mach Rese Commu 23(2):227–232

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenjing Ye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ding, J., Ye, W. A Grid-based integral approach for quasilinear problems. Comput Mech 38, 113–118 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-005-0724-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-005-0724-z

Keywords

Navigation