Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sequentially-coupled space–time FSI analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of an MAV

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a sequentially-coupled space–time (ST) computational fluid–structure interaction (FSI) analysis of flapping-wing aerodynamics of a micro aerial vehicle (MAV). The wing motion and deformation data, whether prescribed fully or partially, is from an actual locust, extracted from high-speed, multi-camera video recordings of the locust in a wind tunnel. The core computational FSI technology is based on the Deforming-Spatial-Domain/Stabilized ST (DSD/SST) formulation. This is supplemented with using NURBS basis functions in temporal representation of the wing and mesh motion, and in remeshing. Here we use the version of the DSD/SST formulation derived in conjunction with the variational multiscale (VMS) method, and this version is called “DSD/SST-VMST.” The structural mechanics computations are based on the Kirchhoff–Love shell model. The sequential-coupling technique is applicable to some classes of FSI problems, especially those with temporally-periodic behavior. We show that it performs well in FSI computations of the flapping-wing aerodynamics we consider here. In addition to the straight-flight case, we analyze cases where the MAV body has rolling, pitching, or rolling and pitching motion. We study how all these influence the lift and thrust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41
Fig. 42
Fig. 43
Fig. 44
Fig. 45
Fig. 46
Fig. 47

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Takizawa K, Henicke B, Puntel A, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space-time computational techniques for the aerodynamics of flapping wings. J Appl Mech 79:010903. doi:10.1115/1.4005073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tezduyar TE (1992) Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations. Adv Appl Mech 28:1–44. doi:10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70153-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94:339–351. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(92)90059-S

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: II. Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94:353–371. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(92)90060-W

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Tezduyar TE (2003) Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 43:555–575. doi:10.1002/fld.505

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2007) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: solution techniques. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:855–900. doi:10.1002/fld.1430

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2011) Multiscale space–time fluid–structure interaction techniques. Comput Mech 48:247–267. doi:10.1007/s00466-011-0571-z

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time fluid–structure interaction methods. Mathe Models Methods Appl Sci 22:1230001. doi:10.1142/S0218202512300013

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and applications. Wiley

  10. Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline upwind/Petrov–Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 32:199–259

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Tezduyar TE, Mittal S, Ray SE, Shih R (1992) Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity–pressure elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 95:221–242. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(92)90141-6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes TJR (1995) Multiscale phenomena: green’s functions, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann formulation, subgrid scale models, bubbles, and the origins of stabilized methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 127:387–401

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hughes TJR, Oberai AA, Mazzei L (2001) Large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows by the variational multiscale method. Phys Fluids 13:1784–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Reali A, Scovazzi G (2007) Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:173–201

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Bazilevs Y, Akkerman I (2010) Large eddy simulation of turbulent Taylor–Couette flow using isogeometric analysis and the residual-based variational multiscale method. J Comput Phys 229:3402–3414

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Hughes TJR, Liu WK, Zimmermann TK (1981) Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 29:329–349

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohayon R (2001) Reduced symmetric models for modal analysis of internal structural–acoustic and hydroelastic–sloshing systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:3009–3019

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. van Brummelen EH, de Borst R (2005) On the nonnormality of subiteration for a fluid–structure interaction problem. SIAM J Sci Comput 27:599–621

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Zhang Y, Hughes TJR (2006) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Comput Mech 38:310–322

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Khurram RA, Masud A (2006) A multiscale/stabilized formulation of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations for moving boundary flows and fluid-structure interaction. Comput Mech 38:403–416

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y (2008) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations. Comput Mech 43:3–37

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Dettmer WG, Peric D (2008) On the coupling between fluid flow and mesh motion in the modelling of fluid–structure interaction. Comput Mech 43:81–90

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Bazilevs Y, Gohean JR, Hughes TJR, Moser RD, Zhang Y (2000) Patient-specific isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(2009):3534–3550

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Benson D, Sankaran S, Marsden A (2009) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and application to a total cavopulmonary connection. Comput Mech 45:77–89

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Zhang Y, Wang W, Liang X, Kvamsdal T, Brekken R, Isaksen J (2010) A fully-coupled fluid–structure interaction simulation of cerebral aneurysms. Comput Mech 46: 3–16

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Zhang Y, Wang W, Kvamsdal T, Hentschel S, Isaksen J (2010) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and application to cerebral aneurysms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9:481–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Wright S, Takizawa K, Henicke B, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part I: geometry modeling and aerodynamics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:207–235. doi:10.1002/fld.2400

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Kiendl J, Wüchner R, Bletzinger K-U (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: fluid–structure interaction modeling with composite blades. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:236–253

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y, Kees CE, Farthing MW (2011) Isogeometric analysis of free-surface flow. J Comput Phys 230:4137–4152

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Blood vessel tissue prestress modeling for vascular fluid–structure interaction simulations. Finite Elements Anal Design 47:593–599

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Nagaoka S, Nakabayashi Y, Yagawa G, Kim YJ (2011) Accurate fluid–structure interaction computations using elements without mid-side nodes. Comput Mech 48:269–276. doi:10.1007/s00466-011-0620-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) ALE-VMS and ST-VMS methods for computer modeling of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics and fluid–structure interaction. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 22:1230002. doi:10.1142/S0218202512300025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y, Benson DJ, Farthing MW, Kees CE (2012) Free-surface flow and fluid–object interaction modeling with emphasis on ship hydrodynamics. J Appl Mech 79:010905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2012) Wind turbine aerodynamics using ALE-VMS: validation and role of weakly enforced boundary conditions. Comput Mech 50:499–511

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2012) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of wind turbines: simulating the full machine. Comput Mech 50:821–833

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Akkerman I, Dunaway J, Kvandal J, Spinks J, Bazilevs Y (2012) Toward free-surface modeling of planing vessels: simulation of the Fridsma hull using ALE-VMS. Comput Mech 50:719–727

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Minami S, Kawai H, Yoshimura S (2012) Parallel BDD-based monolithic approach for acoustic fluid–structure interaction. Comput Mech 50:707–718

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Miras T, Schotte J-S, Ohayon R (2012) Energy approach for static and linearized dynamic studies of elastic structures containing incompressible liquids with capillarity: a theoretical formulation. Comput Mech 50:729–741

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. van Opstal TM, van Brummelen EH, de Borst R, Lewis MR (2012) A finite-element/boundary-element method for large-displacement fluid–structure interaction. Comp Mech 50:779–788

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Yao JY, Liu GR, Narmoneva DA, Hinton RB, Zhang Z-Q (2012) Immersed smoothed finite element method for fluid–structure interaction simulation of aortic valves. Comput Mech 50:789–804

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Larese A, Rossi R, Onate E, Idelsohn SR (2012) A coupled PFEM-Eulerian approach for the solution of porous FSI problems. Comput Mech 50:805–819

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Challenges and directions in computational fluid–structure interaction. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:215–221. doi:10.1142/S0218202513400010

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Korobenko A, Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Tippmann J, Bazilevs Y (2013) Structural mechanics modeling and FSI simulation of wind turbines. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:249–272

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Yao JY, Liu GR, Qian D, Chen CL, Xu GX (2013) A moving-mesh gradient smoothing method for compressible CFD problems. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:273–305

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Kamran K, Rossi R, Onate E, Idelsohn SR (2013) A compressible Lagrangian framework for modeling the fluid–structure interaction in the underwater implosion of an aluminum cylinder. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:339–367

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2013) Finite element simulation of wind turbine aerodynamics: validation study using NREL Phase VI experiment. Wind Energy. doi:10.1002/we.1599

  47. Tezduyar T, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Mittal S (1993) Parallel finite-element computation of 3D flows. Computer 26:27–36. doi:10.1109/2.237441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1994) Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119:73–94. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(94)00077-8

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Tezduyar TE (2001) Finite element methods for flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Arch Comput Methods Eng 8:83–130. doi:10.1007/BF02897870

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Tezduyar T, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Kalro V, Litke M (1996) Flow simulation and high performance computing. Comput Mech 18:397–412. doi:10.1007/BF00350249

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Takizawa K, Henicke B, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Stabilized space–time computation of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics. Comput Mech 48:333–344. doi:10.1007/s00466-011-0589-2

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Takizawa K, Henicke B, Montes D, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Numerical-performance studies for the stabilized space–time computation of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics. Comput Mech 48:647–657. doi:10.1007/s00466-011-0614-5

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, McIntyre S, Kostov N, Kolesar R, Habluetzel C (2014) Space–time VMS computation of wind-turbine rotor and tower aerodynamics. Comput Mech 53:1–15. doi:10.1007/s00466-013-0888-x

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1995) Parallel finite element simulation of 3D incompressible flows—Fluid–structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 21:933–953. doi:10.1002/fld.1650211011

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Kalro V, Tezduyar TE (2000) A parallel 3D computational method for fluid–structure interactions in parachute systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:321–332. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00204-8

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Tezduyar T, Osawa Y (2001) Fluid–structure interactions of a parachute crossing the far wake of an aircraft. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:717–726. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00311-5

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2006) Space–time finite element techniques for computation of fluid–structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:2002–2027. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2004.09.014

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Pausewang J, Schwaab M, Christopher J, Crabtree J (2008) Interface projection techniques for fluid–structure interaction modeling with moving-mesh methods. Comput Mech 43:39–49. doi:10.1007/s00466-008-0261-7

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Schwaab M, Pausewang J, Christopher J, Crabtree J (2008) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of ringsail parachutes. Comput Mech 43:133–142. doi:10.1007/s00466-008-0260-8

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Sathe S, Tezduyar TE (2008) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: contact problems. Comput Mech 43:51–60. doi:10.1007/s00466-008-0299-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2008) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of a patient-specific cerebral aneurysm: influence of structural modeling. Comput Mech 43:151–159. doi:10.1007/s00466-008-0325-8

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J (2010) Multiscale sequentially-coupled arterial FSI technique. Comput Mech 46:17–29. doi:10.1007/s00466-009-0423-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J, Tezduyar TE (2010) Wall shear stress calculations in space–time finite element computation of arterial fluid–structure interactions. Comput Mech 46:31–41. doi:10.1007/s00466-009-0425-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. Manguoglu M, Takizawa K, Sameh AH, Tezduyar TE (2010) Solution of linear systems in arterial fluid mechanics computations with boundary layer mesh refinement. Comput Mech 46:83–89. doi:10.1007/s00466-009-0426-z

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2010) Role of 0D peripheral vasculature model in fluid–structure interaction modeling of aneurysms. Comput Mech 46:43–52. doi:10.1007/s00466-009-0439-7

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J (2010) Space–time finite element computation of complex fluid–structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 64:1201–1218. doi:10.1002/fld.2221

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. Takizawa K, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2011) Space–time FSI modeling and dynamical analysis of spacecraft parachutes and parachute clusters. Comput Mech 48:345–364. doi:10.1007/s00466-011-0590-9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. Manguoglu M, Takizawa K, Sameh AH, Tezduyar TE (2011) A parallel sparse algorithm targeting arterial fluid mechanics computations. Comput Mech 48:377–384. doi:10.1007/s00466-011-0619-0

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) Computational methods for parachute fluid–structure interactions. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19:125–169. doi:10.1007/s11831-012-9070-4

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  70. Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space-time and ALE-VMS techniques for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid–structure interaction modeling. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19:171–225. doi:10.1007/s11831-012-9071-3

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  71. Takizawa K, Fritze M, Montes D, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2012) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of ringsail parachutes with disreefing and modified geometric porosity. Comput Mech 50:835–854. doi:10.1007/s00466-012-0761-3

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  72. Takizawa K, Montes D, Fritze M, McIntyre S, Boben J, Tezduyar TE (2013) Methods for FSI modeling of spacecraft parachute dynamics and cover separation. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:307–338. doi:10.1142/S0218202513400058

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Boben J, Kostov N, Boswell C, Buscher A (2013) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of clusters of spacecraft parachutes with modified geometric porosity. Comput Mech 52:1351–1364. doi:10.1007/s00466-013-0880-5

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry, and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:4135–4195

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJR (2008) NURBS-based isogeometric analysis for the computation of flows about rotating components. Comput Mech 43:143–150

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  76. Takizawa K, Henicke B, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time techniques for computational aerodynamics modeling of flapping wings of an actual locust. Comput Mech 50:743–760. doi:10.1007/s00466-012-0759-x

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. Takizawa K, Kostov N, Puntel A, Henicke B, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time computational analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of a micro aerial vehicle. Comput Mech 50:761–778. doi:10.1007/s00466-012-0758-y

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Takizawa K, Henicke B, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computer modeling techniques for flapping-wing aerodynamics of a locust. Comput Fluids 85:125–134. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.11.008

    Google Scholar 

  79. Tezduyar TE (2004) Finite element methods for fluid dynamics with moving boundaries and interfaces. In: Stein E, Borst RD, Hughes TJR (eds) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics, Vol 3: fluids, Chapter 17. Wiley

  80. Tezduyar TE (2007) Finite elements in fluids: special methods and enhanced solution techniques. Comput Fluids 36:207–223. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.02.010

    Google Scholar 

  81. Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2011) Fluid–structure interaction modeling and performance analysis of the Orion spacecraft parachutes. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:271–285. doi:10.1002/fld.2348

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  82. Takizawa K, Wright S, Moorman C, Tezduyar TE (2011) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of parachute clusters. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:286–307. doi:10.1002/fld.2359

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Schwaab M, Conklin BS (2008) Arterial fluid mechanics modeling with the stabilized space–time fluid–structure interaction technique. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 57:601–629. doi:10.1002/fld.1633

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. Tezduyar TE, Schwaab M, Sathe S (2009) Sequentially-coupled arterial fluid–structure interaction (SCAFSI) technique. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3524–3533. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2008.05.024

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  85. Kiendl J, Bletzinger KU, Linhard J, Wüchner R (2009) Isogeometric shell analysis with Kirchhoff–Love elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3902–3914

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. Kiendl J, Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Wüchner R, Bletzinger K-U (2010) The bending strip method for isogeometric analysis of Kirchhoff–Love shell structures comprised of multiple patches. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:2403–2416

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  87. Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Scott MA (2012) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with emphasis on non-matching discretizations, and with application to wind turbines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 249–252:28–41

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  88. Long CC, Marsden AL, Bazilevs Y (2013) Fluid–structure interaction simulation of pulsatile ventricular assist devices, Comput Mech. doi:10.1007/s00466-013-0858-3

  89. Long CC, Esmaily-Moghadam M, Marsden AL, Bazilevs Y (2013) Computation of residence time in the simulation of pulsatile ventricular assist devices. Comput Mech. doi:10.1007/s00466-013-0931-y

  90. Saad Y, Schultz M (1986) GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 7:856–869

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  91. Karypis G, Kumar V (1998) A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. SIAM J Sci Comp 20:359–392

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  92. Combes SA, Daniel TL (2003) Flexural stiffness in insect wings: I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation. J Exp Biol 206:2979–2987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Chung J, Hulbert GM (1993) A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics withimproved numerical dissipation: the generalized-\(\alpha \) method. J Appl Mech 60:371–375

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Rice–Waseda research agreement (first author) and ARO Grant W911NF-12-1-0162 (second and third authors).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Modern Mechanical Engineering and Waseda Institute for Advanced Study, Waseda University, 1-6-1 Nishi-Waseda, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169-8050, Japan

    Kenji Takizawa

  2. Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, MS 321, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX, 77005, USA

    Tayfun E. Tezduyar & Nikolay Kostov

Authors
  1. Kenji Takizawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tayfun E. Tezduyar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nikolay Kostov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tayfun E. Tezduyar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takizawa, K., Tezduyar, T.E. & Kostov, N. Sequentially-coupled space–time FSI analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of an MAV. Comput Mech 54, 213–233 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-0980-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-0980-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation