Skip to main content
Log in

Seedling growth variation in response to sand burial in four Artemisia species from different habitats in the semi-arid dune field

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Trees Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared seedling growth of four Artemisia species dominated at different habitats to determine whether interspecific seedling growth variation of a same genus in tolerance to burial can be used to explain plant distribution in the sand dune field. Interdune lowland species, Artemisia gmelinii, stabilized dune species, A. frigida, semi-stabilized dune species, A. halodendron, and active dune species, A. wudanica were selected. Seedlings grown for 3 weeks were treated at five burial depths for three burial times in pot experiments. Species from the habitats with little burial had smaller survival rate, dry weight and stem elongation speed than those from the habitats with intensive burial when buried. Furthermore, when buried, the former tended to adjust biomass allocation between shoot and root and produce adventitious buds, while the latter tended to maintain a constant root:shoot ratio and produce adventitious roots. We conclude that (1) seedlings of species with a long evolutionary history of exposure to sand burial (from the active sand dune), show quicker stem growth when buried than do seedlings of species from the habitats with little or no sand burial; (2) seedlings of species which do not change root:shoot ratio might be more tolerant of sand burial than those do; (3) seedlings of species from the habitats with intensive sand burial is prone to produce adventitious roots and seedlings of species from the habitats with little or no sand burial tend to produce adventitious buds when buried.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell Dl, Sultan SE (1999) Dynamic phenotypic plasticity for root growth in Polyonum: a comparative study. Am J Bot 86:807–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer JS, Bertness MD (1996) Distribution and intraspecific variation in the clonal morphology of salt marsh perennials. Oikos 77:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JF (1997) Effects of experimental burial on survival, growth and resource allocation of three species of dune plants. J Ecol 85:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dech JP, Maun MA (2006) Adventitious root production and plastic resource allocation to biomass determine burial tolerance in woody plants from central Canadian coastal dunes. Ann Bot 98:1095–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory P, Cheplick HD (1999) Impact of saltwater spray and sand deposition on the coastal annual Triplasis Purpurea (Poaceae). Am J Bot 86:703–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habrouk A, Retana J, Espelta M (1999) Role of heat tolerance and cone protection of seeds in the response of three pine species to wildfires. Plant Ecol 145:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Huiskes AHL (1979) Biological flora of the British Isles. Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link. (Psamma arenaria (L.) Roem. Et Schult.; Calamagrostis arenaria (L.) Roth). J Ecol 67:363–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa S, Kachi N (2000) Differential salt tolerance of two Artemisia species growing in contrasting coastal habitats. Ecol Res 15:241–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb KJ, Sperry JS (1999) Differences in drought adaptation between subspecies of sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). Ecology 80:2373–2384

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajnyk I, Maun MA (1981) Vegetative reproduction in the juvenile phase of Ammophila breviligulata. Can J Bot 59:883–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y (1985) Flora in Desertis Republicae Populorum Sinarum. Tomus I. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Thompson K, Spencer RE, Reader RJ (2000) A comparative study of morphological response of seedlings roots to drying soil in 20 species from different habitats. Acta Bot Sin 42:628–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA (1994) Adaptations enhancing survival and establishment of seedlings on coastal dune systems. Plant Ecol 111:59–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA (1996) The effects of burial by sand on survival and growth of Calamovilfa longifolia. Ecoscience 3:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA (1997) Adaptations of plants to burial in coastal sand dunes. Can J Bot 76:713–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA (2004) Burial of plants as a selective force in sand dunes. In: Martinez ML, Psuty NP (eds) Coastal dunes, ecology and conservation. Springer, Berlin, pp 119–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA, Baye P (1989) The ecology of Ammophila breviligulata Fern. on coastal sand dune systems. Crit Rev Aquat Sci 1:661–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA, Lapierre J (1984) The effects of burial by sand on Ammophila breviligulata. J Ecol 72:827–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobuhara H (1973) Sand dune formation by coastal plants and their mode of reproduction. J Narashino High School 1:39–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi L, Zhang ZJ, Zhang CY, Zhang JZ (2004) Effects of sand burial on survival, growth, gas exchange and biomass allocation of Ulmus pumila seedlings in the Hunshandak Sandland, China. Ann Bot 94:553–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steven JF, Chris JP (2003) Burial disturbance leads to facilitation among coastal dune plants. Plant Ecol 168:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanborough P, Westoby M (1996) Seedling relative growth rate and its components in relation to seed size: phylogenetically independent contrasts. Funct Ecol 10:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes MT, Wilson JB (1990) An experimental investigation into the response of New Zealand sand dune species to different depths of burial by sand. Acta Bot Neerl 39:171–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapias R, Climent J, Pardos JA, Gil L (2004) Life histories of Mediterranean pines. Plant Ecol 171:53–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villar R, Veneklaas EJ, Jordano P, Lambers H (1998) Relative growth rate and biomass allocation in 20 Aegilops (Poaceae) species. New Phytol 140:425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Q, Liu Z, Zhu J, Luo Y, Wang H, Jiang D (2005) Structure, pattern and mechanisms of formation of seed banks in sand dune systems in northeastern Inner Mongolia, China. Plant Soil 277:175–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Maun MA (1990) Effects of sand burial on seed germination, seedling emergence, survival, and growth of Agropyron psammophilum. Can J Bot 68:304–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Qiaoling Yan, Hongmei Wang, Zhengning Wang and Junling Ma for assistance in the investigation and experiments. This work was financially supported by the project “effects of scale and spatial pattern on vegetation restoration in semi-arid dune fields”, funded by Shenyang Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhimin Liu.

Additional information

Communicated by H.G. Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, B., Liu, Z. & Guan, D. Seedling growth variation in response to sand burial in four Artemisia species from different habitats in the semi-arid dune field. Trees 22, 41–47 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-007-0167-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-007-0167-6

Keywords

Navigation