Skip to main content
Log in

Designing a monitoring network for detecting groundwater pollution with stochastic simulation and a cost model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method is presented to design monitoring networks for detecting groundwater pollution at industrial sites. The goal is to detect the pollution at some distance from the site’s boundary so that it can be cleaned up or hydrologically contained before contaminating groundwater outside the site. It is assumed that pollution may occur anywhere on the site, that transport is by advection only and that no retardation and chemical reactions take place. However, the approach can be easily extended to include designated (and uncertain) source areas, dispersion and reactive transport. The method starts from the premise that it is impossible to detect 100% of all the contaminant plumes with reasonable costs and therefore seeks a balance between the risk of pollution and network density. The design approach takes account of uncertainty in the flow field by simulating realisations of conductivity, groundwater head and associated flow fields, using geostatistical simulation and a groundwater flow model. The realisations are conditioned to conductivity and head observations that may already be present on the site. The result is an ensemble of flow fields that is further analysed using a particle track program. From this the probability of missing a contaminant plume originating anywhere on the terrain can be estimated for a given network. From this probability follows the risk, i.e. the expected costs of an undetected pollution. The total costs of the monitoring strategy are calculated by adding the risk of pollution to the costs of installing and maintaining the monitoring wells and the routinely performed chemical analyses. By repeating this procedure for networks of varying well numbers, the best network is chosen as the one that minimises total cost. The method is illustrated with a simulated example showing the added worth of exploratory wells for characterising hydraulic conductivity of a site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson MP (1997) Characterization of geological heterogeneity. In: Dagan G, Neuman SP (eds) Subsurface flow and transport: a stochastic approach (international hydrology series no. 5). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 23–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ (1993) Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling. Adv Water Resources 16:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ, Binley AM (1992) The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Processes 6:279–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cieniawski SE, Ehaert JW, Ranjithan S (1995) Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiobjective groundwater monitoring problem. Water Resources Res 31:399–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis DR, Dvoranchik WM (1997) Evaluation of the worth of additional data. Water Resources Bull 7:700–707

    Google Scholar 

  • De Marsily G, Lavedan C, Boucher M, Fasanino G (1984) Interpretation of inference tests in a well field using geostatistical techniques to fit the permeability distribution in a reservoir model. In: Verly G, David M, Journel AG, Marechal A (eds) Geostatistics for natural resources characterization (NATO ASI series C no. 182), pp 831–849

  • Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library and User’s Guide, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeze RA, Massmann J, Smith L, Sperling T, James B (1990) Hydrogeological decision analysis: 1. a framework. Ground Water 28:738–766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeze RA, James B, Massmann J, Sperling T, Smith L (1992) Hydrogeological decision analysis: 4. The concept of data worth and its use in the development of site investigation strategies. Ground Water 30:574–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelhar LW (1993) Stochastic subsurface hydrology. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Goméz-Hernández JJ, Sahuquillo A, Capilla JE (1997) Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data—I. Theory. J Hydrol 203:162–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh AW, McDonald MG (1996) User’s documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the US Geological Survey modular finite-difference ground-water flow model. US Geological Survey open-file report, pp 96–485

  • Hendicks Franssen HJWM (2000) Inverse stochastic modelling of groundwater flow and mass transport. PhD Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

  • Hudak PF, Loaiciga HA (1992) A location modeling approach for groundwater monitoring network augmentation. Water Resources Res 28:643–649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loaiciga HA (1989) An optimization approach for groundwater quality monitoring network design. Water Resources Res 25:1771–1782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Massmann J, Freeze RA, Smith L, Sperling T, James B (1991) Hydrogeological decision analysis: 2. Applications to ground-water contamination. Ground Water 29:536–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin D, Reid LB, Li S-G, Hyman J (1993) A stochastic method for characterizing ground-water contamination. Ground Water 32:237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer PD, Brill ED (1988) A method for locating wells in a groundwater monitoring network under conditions of uncertainty. Water Resources Res 23:1277–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer PD, Ranjithan S, Ehaert JW, Valocchi AJ (1992) Groundwater monitoring network design at hazardous waste disposal facilities under conditions of uncertainty. In: Project report 91011, Hazard waste Resources and Information Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana

  • Pollock DW (1994) User’s guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, version 3: a particle track post-processing package for MODFLOW, the US Geological Survey finite-difference ground-water flow model. US Geological Survey open-file report, pp 94–646

  • Ramarao BS, Lavenueu AM, de Marsily G, Marietta MG (1995) Pilot point methodology for automated calibration of an ensemble of conditionally simulated transmissivity fields, 1. Theory and computational experiments. Water Resources Res 31:475–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tusveld MCL (1994) MODISCO: geautomatiseerde ontwerpmethode voor monitoringsystemen rond verontreinigde lokaties (MODISCO: automated design method for monitoring systems around polluted locations). H2O 27:670–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Groenigen JW, Stein A (1997) Constrained optimization of spatial sampling using continuous simulated annealing. J Environ Qual 27:1078–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. F. P. Bierkens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bierkens, M.F.P. Designing a monitoring network for detecting groundwater pollution with stochastic simulation and a cost model. Stoch Environ Res Ris Assess 20, 335–351 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-005-0025-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-005-0025-2

Keywords

Navigation