Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Soft computing-based new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria group assessment method with last aggregation to industrial decision problems

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies have identified that multi-criteria group analysis methods should take the concepts of risk and uncertainty into account. In some real-life situations, determining the exact values for the potential alternatives’ performances and criteria weights is so difficult. To overcome with these situations, their values should be regarded as fuzzy and fuzzy intervals. In this respect, interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets (IVHFSs) as a suitable modern fuzzy sets theory can be considered because this theory allows decision makers (DMs) to assign some interval-values membership degrees for an alternative in terms of selected criteria under a set to margin of errors. Hence, this paper proposes a novel soft computing approach, namely IVHF-MCGA, based on new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy complex proportional assessment (IVHF-COPRAS) method that can be applied in solving the multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) problems under uncertainty. In this approach, preference values of potential alternatives versus the selected criteria and weights of each criterion are expressed by linguistic variables and then are transformed to interval-valued hesitant fuzzy elements (IVHFEs). In addition, an interval-valued hesitant fuzzy entropy (IVHF-entropy) method is extended to determine the criteria weights by considering the DMs’ opinions about the relative importance. Also, a new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy compromise solution (IVHF-CS) method is introduced to estimate the weight of each DM in the group decision-making process along with the last aggregation for the DMs’ judgments to avoid the data loss. Then, three practical applications about the robot selection, industrial site selection and rapid prototyping process selection problems are considered to explain steps of the proposed IVHF-MCGA approach and to indicate its validity and applicability. Finally, a comparative analysis between the proposed approach and fuzzy group TOPSIS method is presented based on four comparison parameters, including adequacy to changes of alternatives and criteria, agility in decision process, influence of DMs’ weights and impact of first and last aggregations, to show its suitability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Malek L, Resare LJ (2000) Algorithm based decision support system for the concerted selection of equipment in machining/assembly cells. Int J Prod Res 38:323–339

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal VP, Kohli V, Gupta S (1991) Computer aided robot selection: the ‘multiple attribute decision making’ approach. Int J Prod Res 29:1629–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:87–96

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (1989) More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 33:37–45

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (2000) Two theorems for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 110:267–269

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ayağ Z (2010) A combined fuzzy AHP-simulation approach to CAD software selection. Int J Gen Syst 39:731–756

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bhangale PP, Agrawal VP, Saha SK (2004) Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of a robot. Mech Mach Theory 39:1345–1366

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bustince H (1994) Conjuntos Intuicionistas e Intervalo valorados difusos: propiedades y construcci on. Thesis, Universidad P\_ublica de Navarra, Relaciones Intuicionistas Fuzzy

  • Byun HS, Lee KH (2005) A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:1338–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee P, Athawale VM, Chakraborty S (2010) Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 26:483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen N, Zeshui X, Xia M (2013) Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 37:528–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu T-C, Lin Y-C (2003) A fuzzy TOPSIS method for robot selection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devi K (2011) Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection. Expert Syst Appl 38:14163–14168

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhadinia B (2013) Information measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 240:129–144

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goh C-H (1997) Analytic hierarchy process for robot selection. J Manuf Syst 16:381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorzałczany MB (1987) A method of inference in approximate reasoning based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 21:1–17

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • İç YT, Yurdakul M, Dengiz B (2013) Development of a decision support system for robot selection. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 29:142–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junior FR, Lima LO, Carpinetti LCR (2014) A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Appl Soft Comput 21:194–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsak EE (2005) Choquet integral-based decision making approach for robot selection. In: Khosla R, Howlett RJ, Jain LC (eds) Choquet integral-based decision making approach for robot selection. Knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems. Springer, pp 635–641

  • Li L-G, Peng D-H (2014) Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy Hamacher synergetic weighted aggregation operators and their application to shale gas areas selection. Math Probl Eng 2014:1–25

  • Li G-D, Yamaguchi D, Nagai M (2007) A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem. Math Comput Model 46(3–4):573–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao H, Xu Z (2014) Subtraction and division operations over hesitant fuzzy sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27:65–72

  • Liu H-C, Ren M-L, Jing W, Lin Q-L (2014) An interval 2-tuple linguistic MCDM method for robot evaluation and selection. Int J Prod Res 52:2867–2880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi SM, Jolai F, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2013a) A fuzzy stochastic multi-attribute group decision-making approach for selection problems. Group Decis Negot 22(2): 207–233

  • Mousavi SM, Vahdani B, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Ebrahimnejad S, Amiri M (2013b) A multi-stage decision-making process for multiple attributes analysis under an interval-valued fuzzy environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64:1263–1273

  • Mousavi SM, Mirdamadi S, Siadat A, Dantan J, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2015) An intuitionistic fuzzy grey model for selection problems with an application to the inspection planning in manufacturing firms. Eng Appl Artif Intell 39:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ölçer Aİ, Odabaşi AY (2005) A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem. Eur J Oper Res 166:93–114

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao RV (2013) Multiple attribute decision making in the manufacturing environment. In: Pham DT (ed) Decision making in manufacturing environment using graph theory and fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. Springer

  • Rao RV, Patel BK, Parnichkun M (2011) Industrial robot selection using a novel decision making method considering objective and subjective preferences. Robot Auton Syst 59:367–375

  • Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:529–539

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Torra V, Narukawa Y (2009) On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. IEEE international conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp 1378–1382

  • Turksen IB (1986) Interval valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:191–210

  • Türkşen İB, Bilgiç T (1996) Interval valued strict preference with Zadeh triples. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78:183–195

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vahdani B, Hadipour H, Sadaghiani JS, Amiri M (2010) Extension of VIKOR method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47:1231–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahdani B, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Mousavi SM, Ghodratnama A (2013) Soft computing based on new interval-valued fuzzy modified multi-criteria decision-making method. Appl Soft Comput 13:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahdani B, Mousavi SM, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Ghodratnama A, Mohammadi M (2014) Robot selection by a multiple criteria complex proportional assessment method under an interval-valued fuzzy environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(5–8):687–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahdani B, Hadipour H (2011) Extension of the ELECTRE method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Soft Comput 15:569–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y-J (2014) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model by associating technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution with relative preference relation. Inf Sci 268:169–184

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y-J (2015) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model based on simple additive weighting method and relative preference relation. Appl Soft Comput 30:412–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Zhang X (2013) Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl Based Syst 52:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao J-S, Ming-Miin Y (2004) Decision making based on statistical data, signed distance and compositional rule of inference. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 12:161–190

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yue Z (2011) An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers. Knowl Based Syst 24:146–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Wang C, Tian D, Li K (2014) Induced generalized hesitant fuzzy operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 67:116–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Zeshui X (2014) Interval programming method for hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete preference over alternatives. Comput Ind Eng 75:217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Lin R, Wei G (2014) Hesitant triangular fuzzy information aggregation based on Einstein operations and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Expert Syst Appl 41:1086–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Young Researchers and Elite Club, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    H. Gitinavard

  2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

    S. M. Mousavi

  3. Faculty of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

    B. Vahdani

Authors
  1. H. Gitinavard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. M. Mousavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Vahdani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Gitinavard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gitinavard, H., Mousavi, S.M. & Vahdani, B. Soft computing-based new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria group assessment method with last aggregation to industrial decision problems. Soft Comput 21, 3247–3265 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-015-2006-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-015-2006-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation