Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Blockchain technology and IoT-edge framework for sharing healthcare services

  • Application of soft computing
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) can be used in the healthcare sector to exchange patients' information, but there are many concerns about the privacy and security of the patients' confidential information or transferring this information. Data integrity is difficult to ensure since generated data from IoT devices are split into parts and stored in numerous edge servers in various locations. Data loss and improper data storage in edge servers make it difficult to ensure data integrity. The various security challenges and data integrity of edge computing can be handled by integrating blockchain (BC) technologies. BC paradigm provides a new infrastructure and security rules to enable IoT devices to get trusted interoperability for information and business. So, many healthcare institutions based on BC technology have the ability for data storage and support trust. This work aims to presents an IoT-Edge framework for the exchange of data without changing utilizing data processing and BC techniques. IoT devices can monitor follow the patient's status remotely and subsequently overcome the possibility of difficult cases. The proposed system presents many healthcare institutions' features by providing the complete preservation of patients' data with its confidential transmission and submits the results of the patient examination safely. The proposed system is user-friendly and offers the required utilities for integrity and confidentiality of information. Some simulation and performance experiments are conducted; the findings indicate an acceptable performance as an IoT-Edge framework based on BC technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aazam EN et al. (2014) Fog computing and smart gateway based communication for cloud of things innovative cloud and security lab

  • Ai Y, Peng M, Zhang K (2018) Edge computing technologies for Internet of Things: a primer. Digital Commun Netw 4:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso RS (2013) Implementing a hardware-embedded reactive agents platform based on a service-oriented architecture over heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, ScienceDirect

  • Applebaum B (2017) Arithmetic Cryptography

  • Asim M (2017) A survey on application layer protocols for Internet of Things (IoT). Int J Adv Res Comput Sci 8(3):996–1000

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bahga A, Madisetti VK (2016) Blockchain platform for industrial. JSEA. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2016.910036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas K and Muthukkumarasamy V (2016) Securing Smart Cities Using Blockchain Technology," 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 14th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS), pp. 1392–1393, https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCC-SmartCity-DSS.2016.0198.

  • Bocek T, Rodrigues BB, Strasser T, and Stiller B (2017) Blockchains everywhere_A use-case of blockchains in the pharma supply-chain,'' in Proc. IFIP/IEEE Symp. Integr. Netw. Service Manage. (IM), Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 772_777. https://doi.org/10.23919/INM.2017.7987376

  • Bonomi F, Milito R, Zhu J, and Addepalli S (2012) Fog computing and its role in the internet of things. In Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on Mobile cloud computing (MCC '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2342509.2342513.

  • Brumley D (2005) Remote timing attacks are practical," ScienceDirect

  • Burhan M (2018) IoT Elements, Layered Architectures and Security Issues: A Comprehensive Survey," MDPI

  • Cai H, Xu B, Jiang L, Vasilakos AV (2017) IoT-based big data storage systems in cloud computing: perspectives and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J 4(1):75–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2016.2619369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlos Salazar KKP (2016) Internet of Things-IOT: definition, characteristics, architecture, enabling technologies, application & future challenges," IJESC

  • Casino F, Dasaklis TK, Patsakis C (2019) A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: current status, classification and open issues. Telematics Inform 36:55–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekhar K (2016) Internet of Things (IoT) Characteristics," Linkedin, 19 September. [Online]. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/internet-things-iot-characteristics-kavyashree-g-c

  • Chang J (2018) Blockchain design for supply chain management

  • Chen H, Heidari AA, Chen H, Wang M, Pan Z, Gandomi AH (2020) Multi-population differential evolution-assisted Harris hawks optimization: Framework and case studies. Futur Gener Comput Syst 111:175–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Xu L, Shah N, Gao Z, Lu Y, Shi W (2017) On security analysis of proof-of-elapsed-time (PoET). In: Spirakis P, Tsigas P (eds) Stabilization, safety, and security of distributed systems. SSS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H (2019) A survey on ethereum systems security: vulnerabilities, attacks and defenses

  • Chendeb N, Khaled N, Agoulmine N (2020) Integrating Blockchain with IoT for a Secure Healthcare Digital System. 8th International Workshop on ADVANCEs in ICT Infrastructures and Services (ADVANCE 2020), Candy E. Sansores, Universidad del Caribe, Mexico, Nazim Agoulmine, IBISC Lab, University of Evry - Paris -Saclay University, Jan 2020, Cancún, Mexico. pp.1–8. ffhal-02495262f

  • Christidis K, Devetsikiotis M (2016) Blockchains and smart contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2566339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti M (2016) A survey of man in the middle attacks," IEEE

  • Čolaković A, Hadžialić M (2018) Internet of Things (IoT): a review of enabling technologies, challenges, and open research issues. Comput Netw 144:17–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIY Raspberry Pi Cryptocurrency Node. [Online]. http://raspnode.com/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).

  • Datla D et al (2012) Wireless distributed computing: a survey of research challenges. IEEE Commun Mag 50(1):144–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2012.6122545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debus J (2017) Consensus method in blockchain system

  • Delmolino K, Arnett M, Kosba A, Miller A, Shi E (2016) Step by step towards creating a safe smart contract: lessons and insights from a cryptocurrency lab. In: Clark J, Meiklejohn S, Ryan P, Wallach D, Brenner M, Rohloff K (eds) Financial cryptography and data security. FC 2016. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53357-4_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dorri A, Kanhere SS, Jurdak R and Gauravaram P (2017) Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home," 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), pp. 618-623, https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2017.7917634

  • El_Rahman SA, Almayouf RY, Alghamdi ST, Almutairi AS, Chehab SM, Alasmari BM and Altherw RH (2020) Edge Cloud-IoT Framework based on Blockchain”, 2020 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCIS), October 13 – 15, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia

  • Elazhary H (2019) Internet of Things (IoT), mobile cloud, cloudlet, mobile IoT IoT cloud, fog, mobile edge, and edge emerging computing paradigms: Disambiguation and research directions. J Netw Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2018.10.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethereum Computer Built On Embedded Devices. [Online]. http://ethembedded.com/

  • Feng Y, Deb S, Wang G, Alavi AH (2021) Monarch butterfly optimization: a comprehensive review. Expert Syst Appl 168:114418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Caramés TM, Fraga-Lamas P (2018) A review on the use of blockchain for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access 6:32979–33001. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2842685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filipova N (2018) Blockchain – an opportunity for developing new business models

  • Fotiou N and Polyzos GC (2018) Smart contracts for the Internet of Things: opportunities and challenges”, 2018 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC), Ljubljana, Slovenia, Slovenia, https://doi.org/10.1109/EuCNC.2018.8443212

  • Gaur N (2018) Hands-on blockchain with hyperledger

  • González-Briones A (2018) GreenVMAS: virtual organization based platform for heating greenhouses using waste energy from power plants. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger M (2019) Block what? The unrealized potential

  • Gui T, Ma C, Wang F and Wilkins DE (2016) Survey on swarm intelligence based routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: An extensive study," 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), pp. 1944-1949, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2016.7475064

  • Gupta S (2016) Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks and defense mechanisms: classification and state-of-the-art," CrossMark

  • Hameed K, Bajwa IS, Sarwar N, Anwar W, Mushtaq Z, Rashid T (2021) Integration of 5G and block-chain technologies in smart telemedicine using IoT. J Healthcare Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8814364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidari AA, Mirjalili S, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Chen H (2019) Harris hawks optimization: algorithm and applications [J]. Futur Gener Comput Syst 97:849–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hileman G (2017) Global Blockchain Benchmarking Study

  • Hyperledger (2018) Advancing business blockchain adoption through global open source collaboration 2018. [Online]. https://www.hyperledger.org/.

  • IBM (2018) Why new off-chain storage is required for Blockchains," IBM Storage

  • Ibrahim DS (2019) Enhancing Cloud Computing Security using Cryptography & Steganography

  • Ismailisufi A, Popović T, Gligorić N, Radonjic S, & Šandi S (2020) A private blockchain implementation using multichain open source platform. https://doi.org/10.1109/IT48810.2020.9070689.

  • Jayasinghe U (2019) TrustChain: a privacy preserving blockchain with edge computing

  • Kanakam P (2019) Intramural analysis of blockchain

  • Karafiloski E and Mishev A (2017) Blockchain solutions for big data challenges: a literature review," IEEE EUROCON 2017 -17th International Conference on Smart Technologies pp. 763–768, https://doi.org/10.1109/EUROCON.2017.8011213

  • Khan M, Salah K (2017) IoT security: review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges. Future Gener Comput Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.11.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattak HA (2019) Perception layer security in Internet of Things," ScienceDirect

  • Kombe C, Dida M, Sam A (2018). A review on healthcare information systems and consensus protocols in blockchain technology. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 5. 473–483. https://doi.org/10.19101/IJATEE.2018.547023.

  • Kuo TT (2019) Comparison of blockchain platforms: a systematic review and healthcare examples

  • Lea P (2018) Internet of Things for architects

  • Li S, Chen H, Wang M, Heidari AA, Mirjalili S (2020b) Slime mould algorithm: a new method for stochastic optimization. Futur Gener Comput Syst 111:300–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.03.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Lei H, Alavi AH, Wang G-G (2020a) Elephant herding optimization: variants, hybrids, and applications. Mathematics 8(9):1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8091415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Song T, Mei B, Li H, Cheng X, Sun L (2019) Blockchain for large-scale Internet of Things data storage and protection. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 12(5):762–771. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2018.2853167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Wang GG, Gandomi AH (2012) A survey of learning-based intelligent optimization algorithms. Arch Computat Methods Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09562-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wang K, Lin Y, Xu W (2019) $\mathsf{LightChain}$: a lightweight blockchain system for industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 15(6):3571–3581. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.2904049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomotey RK, Pry J, Sriramoju S, Kaku E, Deters R (2017) Wearable IoT data architecture. IEEE World Congr Serv (SERVICES) 2017:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/SERVICES.2017.17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lueth KL (2015) IoT basics: getting started with the Internet of Things," IoT Analytics, Online] https://iot-analytics.com/

  • Macdonald M (2017) The blockchain: a comparison of platforms and their uses beyond Bitcoin

  • Marjani M et al (2017) Big IoT data analytics: architecture, opportunities, and open research challenges. IEEE Access 5:5247–5261. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2689040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroufi (2019) "On the Convergence of Blockchain and Internet of Things (IoT) Technologies

  • Moin S, Karim A, Safdar Z, Safdar K, Ahmed E, Imran M (2019) Securing IoTs in distributed blockchain: analysis, requirements and open issues,". Future Gener Comput Syst 100:325–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto S (2008) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. [Online]. http://www.ildgroup.si/uploads/product/20/bitcoin.pdf

  • Novo O (2018) Blockchain meets IoT: an architecture for scalable access management in IoT. IEEE Internet Things J 5(2):1184–1195. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2812239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouaddah A (2017) FairAccess: a new Blockchain-based access control framework for the Internet of Things

  • Pahl C (2018) A decision framework for blockchain platforms for IoT and edge Computing

  • Panarello A (2018) Blockchain and IoT integration: a systematic survey

  • Perboli G, Musso S, Rosano M (2018) "Blockchain in logistics and supply chain: a lean approach for designing real-world use cases. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2875782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posey B (2017) Computer exploit," Search Security, September. [Online]. Available: https://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/exploit.

  • Preden JS, Tammemäe K, Jantsch A, Leier M, Riid A, Calis E (2015) The benefits of self-awareness and attention in fog and mist computing. Computer 48(7):37–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2015.207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puthal D (2016) Threats to Networking Cloud and Edge Datacenters in the Internet of Things, IEEE

  • Rajeev S, Geetha G (2012) Cryptographic hash functions: a review. Int J Comput Sci Issues 9:461–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejeb A (2019) Leveraging the Internet of Things and blockchain technology in supply chain management

  • Ren Y (2019) Secure data storage based on blockchain and coding in edge computing

  • Reyna A (2018) On blockchain and its integration with IoT. Challenges and opportunities

  • Ruckebusch P (2016) Gitar: generic extension for internet-of-things architectures enabling dynamic updates of network and application modules

  • Russell B and Van Duren D (2016) Practical Internet of Things Security

  • Salahuddin MA, Al-Fuqaha A, Guizani M, Shuaib K, Sallabi F (2017) Softwarization of Internet of Things infrastructure for secure and smart healthcare. Computer 50(7):74–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaniego M and Deters R (2016) Hosting virtual IoT resources on edge-hosts with blockchain, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT), pp. 116-119, https://doi.org/10.1109/CIT.2016.71.

  • Seok B, Park J, Park JH (2019) A lightweight hash-based blockchain architecture for industrial IoT. Appl Sci 9(18):3740. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shae Z and Tsai JJP (2017) On the design of a blockchain platform for clinical trial and precision medicine," 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), 2017, pp. 1972–1980, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.2017.61.

  • Sharam A (2018) Comparative analysis of cryptographic hash functions. Cryptographic hash functions

  • Shi S, He D, Li L, Kumar N, Khan MK, Choo KR (2020) Applications of blockchain in ensuring the security and privacy of electronic health record systems: a survey. Comput Secur 97:101966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.101966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sittón-Candanedo I (2019) A review of edge computing reference architectures and a new global edge proposal, ScienceDirect

  • Sittón-Candanedo I (2019) IoT Standards and Protocols," 11 January. [Online]. https://www.postscapes.com/internet-of-things-protocols/.

  • Suárez-Albela M, Fernández-Caramés TM, Fraga-Lamas P, Castedo L (2017) A practical evaluation of a high-security energy-efficient gateway for IoT fog computing applications. Sensors 17(9):1978. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17091978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taherkordi A (2013) Optimizing sensor network reprogramming via in situ reconfigurable components

  • Tang J (2018) Intelligent mobile projects with TensorFlow: intelligent mobile projects with TensorFlow: Build 10+ artificial intelligence apps using TensorFlow mobile and lite for iOS, android, and raspberry Pi”, Kindle Edition, Packt

  • Wang GG (2018) Moth search algorithm: a bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for global optimization problems. Memetic Comp 10:151–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12293-016-0212-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G-G, Deb S, Coelho L (2015) Earthworm optimization algorithm: a bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for global optimization problems. Int J Bio-Inspired Comput. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIC.2015.10004283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang GG, Gandomi AH, Alavi AH et al (2019) A comprehensive review of krill herd algorithm: variants, hybrids and applications. Artif Intell Rev 51:119–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-017-9559-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Zha X, Ni W, Liu RP, Guo YJ, Niu X, Zheng K (2019) Survey on blockchain for Internet of Things”. Comput Commun 136:10–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2019.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L (2019) Cryptographic primitives in blockchains p. 45

  • Wu Z, Meng Z, Gray J (2017) IoT-based techniques for online M2M-interactive itemized data registration and offline information traceability in a digital manufacturing system. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 13(5):2397–2405. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2704613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousefpour A (2019) All one needs to know about fog computing and related edge computing paradigms: a complete survey, ScienceDirect

  • Zhang S (2019) Analysis of the main consensus protocols of blockchain

  • Zhang H (2019) Object tracking for a smart city using iot and edge computing MDPI

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University through the Fast-track Research Funding Program. The authors thank all participants especially Almayouf RY, Alghamdi ST, Almutairi AS, Chehab, SM, Alasmari BM and Altherw RH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information Systems Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Ala Saleh Alluhaidan

  2. Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering-Shoubra, Benha University, Cairo, Egypt

    Sahar A. ElRahman

Authors
  1. Sahar A. ElRahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ala Saleh Alluhaidan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sahar A. ElRahman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

ElRahman, S.A., Alluhaidan, A.S. Blockchain technology and IoT-edge framework for sharing healthcare services. Soft Comput 25, 13753–13777 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06041-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06041-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation